Z06VolinWV
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2009
- Messages
- 5,634
- Likes
- 13,683
Standard answer.....The post was more about pointing out how any negative observation is attacked when some of those observations are identical to coach Pruitt's.
Standard answer.....
ANY negative observation is NOT attacked. I’ve made negative posts today and haven’t been or felt attacked.
CONSISTENTLY negative posters, especially those that admit to trolling,get attacked (kinda like consistently positive posters do).
Pruitt expects more from this team than any of us do. I love that.
Chef gets attacked. You get disagreed with. Saying you got “attacked” is a bit extra. If someone disagrees with me I don’t default to feeling attacked.I've been attacked for some of the very same stuff Pruitt said in his post game, on the field interview. It's happened today when someone said it was utep, diminishing the result.
Sometime it probably does, but no more than negative posters mock “sunshine pumpers” for posting something positive.Nah. It many times goes beyond disagreement. But that's JMO.
I think we did too. I think UTEP is substantially better the ETSU too. This definitely one of those situations where the score is not representative of the game.