'18 Recruiting Forum: Official UTEP Pre-Game/Game Thread

The post was more about pointing out how any negative observation is attacked when some of those observations are identical to coach Pruitt's.
Standard answer.....

ANY negative observation is NOT attacked. I’ve made negative posts today and haven’t been or felt attacked.

CONSISTENTLY negative posters, especially those that admit to trolling,get attacked (kinda like consistently positive posters do).

Pruitt expects more from this team than any of us do. I love that.
 
Surprised at the negativity right now, but this is VolNation. If you just look at the score sure. But we had a TD taken off the board on the Banks “fumble” and another TD wiped away on a penalty that had zero effect on the play (still can’t happen). Had 345 yards rushing and out gained them 512 to 134, simply put we dominated them. Few thoughts on individual player.
JG > KC, JG shouldn’t come out of the game unless injury or equipment issues.
Ty Chandler is our best back and it’s pretty obvious, has that burst the others don’t.
Dline as a whole looked good, Paul Bain was making plays!!!
 
My concern remains how slow we are. Very little speed on this team

This is true... It made me laugh when the announcer said “you can’t do that with that much speed on defense” talking about the QB running backwards and passing into the flat
 
Standard answer.....

ANY negative observation is NOT attacked. I’ve made negative posts today and haven’t been or felt attacked.

CONSISTENTLY negative posters, especially those that admit to trolling,get attacked (kinda like consistently positive posters do).

Pruitt expects more from this team than any of us do. I love that.

I've been attacked for some of the very same stuff Pruitt said in his post game, on the field interview. It's happened today when someone said it was utep, diminishing the result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chief Vol 13
I've been attacked for some of the very same stuff Pruitt said in his post game, on the field interview. It's happened today when someone said it was utep, diminishing the result.
Chef gets attacked. You get disagreed with. Saying you got “attacked” is a bit extra. If someone disagrees with me I don’t default to feeling attacked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JacketVol
I didn’t get to see much of the game but noticed Richmond playing poorly in the first half and still in the game at the end. Any ideas on the coaches’ rationale for keeping him in? Trying to get him going? Have no other options?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JacketVol
Nah. It many times goes beyond disagreement. But that's JMO.
Sometime it probably does, but no more than negative posters mock “sunshine pumpers” for posting something positive.

Again, I’ve posted negative things today and didn’t get attacked, because I’m not a consistently negative poster.

btw, quote me a post that you feel is an attack on you.
 
When did I say we played SEC winning football today? Thank goodness our coaches don’t look at 10 plays (we actually had 8 penalties) and decide how we played
YOU said we played better today. I’m not attacking you but we didn’t.
 
I think we did too. I think UTEP is substantially better the ETSU too. This definitely one of those situations where the score is not representative of the game.

Indeed. Our third down offense has been really bad all season and hasn’t improved at all, imo outside of poor oline play it’s probably the biggest weakness. It’s how close games turn in to blowouts and winnable games turn into losses. Third down defense went from playing WVU to ETSU and utep so kinda hard to know if it actually improved at all😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaagerVol

VN Store



Back
Top