I was just told that the reason why the "Great Commission" was given was to spread the word. Why do that if they already have been given the word and supposedly rejected it?
What exactly are you looking for here? If your mom told you sticking your hand in the fire would burn you, and you believed her, would you let your little sister stick her hand in? Or would you tell her what you know, because you don't want her to be harmed?
:good!: You understand me, I'm sure. It's a game of semantics now. That's why I asked what you were looking for.Simply doesn't make sense. Why is my mom telling me not to touch the hot stove, but saying nothing to my little sister? Why let her get burned, even if she was told last week it was hot?
Why does that take the choice out of it?
Where does it say that God is not warning everyone?
He is omniscient. The whole "knowing you before you were made" thing and all. He already knows who won't believe. By definition, that means there isn't so much a choice as a result.
I've been following this thread when I can, and don't have all the details but there is another interpretation that the word "knowing" also means "loving"... as in "Abraham knew Sarah" which is interpretated as Abraham loved Sarah. I think this makes more sense as God "loved you before you were made"... which is true for everyone.
So you are saying the Native Americans, the Japanese, the Aborigines of Australia, the tribes of the Congo, etc. were all told about Christ and God? Because it is pretty clear they weren't. And if they were told a long time ago and then chose to reject the information, as I have been told before, then how would that be fair to their descendants that were never given that chance?
I don't think I said that at all... but I'm not a calvanist type of Christian. I certainly believe God is omniscient, but I also believe there is a difference between foreknowledge and predestination.
If it were foreknowledge, then the event could still be changed. The problem with that is that would mean God could be wrong. That's why it ends up being predestination by default.
So if you and I, died in a car wreck tomorrow. And you went to Hell, and I went to heaven. It would be because God knew it was gonna happen, so he had to have chosen our fates?
Remember, you said earlier, that you were raised in church, and decided it wasn't for you.
You cannot make that judgement, based on what they chose to believe, or not believe.
If it were foreknowledge, then the event could still be changed. This is true. The problem with that is that would mean God could be wrong. That's why it ends up being predestination by default. This is false.
He made me the way I am. He had complete control over how my life went up unto that point. The cards were lain out in such a way as to ensure I wouldn't "choose" to believe in him.
Let's look at it this way, as well: who is to say I wouldn't have found God a week after the crash? Why would God limit one person's chances, and not another? How is that fair?