McDad
I can't brain today; I has the dumb.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Messages
- 56,611
- Likes
- 118,833
I am saying he is using social pressure to shame the idiot politician and he got it served back to him. He would have been better served, and more consistent with libertarianism, to:Are you saying that because Binion doesn't like when people act like guns are cute toys, he's not about maximizing freedom? That would be an illogical, non-sequitur conclusion.
1. His adoption of the narrative they are "machines used to kill people".
2. The incongruency of ideology (libertarians want maximum freedom).
3. The silly notion that something legal, and of no harm to another, should be hidden away.
1. Wait, what? That's what they are. Let's not kid ourselves. You can frame it another way and say they are machines used to protect people, but they protect because they kill. I mean, you're firmly on the side of right-wing political correctness here.
2. It's not incongruent ideologically. It's incongruent to your idea of what 2A supporters are.
3. Straw man. He didn't say guns should be hidden away, he decried the idea that they are cute toys.
...and why is it never their fault? Because they never support a candidate with a snowball's chance in hell of winning.
The pro gun lobbyists knowingly and proactively sought/seek to deceive and mislead the public about their product, often with the blessing/help of government.What about the pro gun lobbyists do you find repulsive? The others I mentioned knowingly and proactively sought/seek to deceive and mislead the public about their product, often with the blessing/help of government.
If you think on it objectively, you can come to no other conclusion other than guns are used in several ways which have absolutely nothing to do with killing people. His premise is wrong. Therefore, his stance is faulty.
I would think consistency is important in forming logical arguments.
How so? Everybody knows what a gun is and what it is capable of. Your example and mine aren't in the same hemisphere.The pro gun lobbyists knowingly and proactively sought/seek to deceive and mislead the public about their product, often with the blessing/help of government.
I just eliminated a few words from your post.
From your link -
Only 5% of suicide attempts are successful.
- Over 65,000 Australians make a suicide attempt each year.
- In 2019, 3,318 Australians took their own life.
It seems that not using a gun as your preferred method may be a good thing.
If a loved one of mine was going to attempt suicide, I would hope they would choose a method other than a gun.
You all keep saying bad timing. When would be a good time?It is perfectly within their rights to post this Christmas cards. IMO, it's bad timing and bad optics. I think people voting against Massie strictly based upon this photo is a valid response.
People right now revel in the being an a$$hole for the sake of being an a$$hole. Of course you have the right to be an a$$hole, but it doesn't make you a champion of individual liberties when you exercise that right. It just makes you an a$$hole worthy of scorn.