Now we are getting somewhere - you admit yours is an opinion. Next we'll work on how it's not lying if you express a different opinion than someone else. I suspect that one will take some time.
FYI, the Republicans didn't trot out the DoE and I'm quite sure their analysis is better than yours (just as one example).
You're an idiot. I'm not an old man and I critically read your tripe. It didn't hold up to any scrutiny. Implying that I don't learn is exactly the road I would expect from someone arguing as you have here. Don't dare look at the sewage for an argument you presented. Just assume everyone else can't read, can't understand or is closed minded. That's why youve quickly been labeled an idiot.
If you're not an old man, then why do you act like a old man who can't even begin to entertain an idea he doesn't like without getting all ugly about it? I mean you act really old...and fat.You act nothing but rude and stone cold stupid.
The quality of your assumptions is predictable, but absolutely awe inspiring. Keep working at it and you'll eventually get something right. Keep using names in evaluation and you probably won't, but you'll keep being entertainment.
I'm not sure if that embarrasses UT or what. I'm thinking the embarrassment angle more than the or what.