OrangeEmpire
The White Debonair
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2005
- Messages
- 74,988
- Likes
- 59
I'd prefer not to pay for it all. If someone wants to be educated or wants their children to be then they should take full responsibility for the education.
I suppose that can be true sometimes. All the home school kids I knew were just strange and completely socially inept. The ones I knew came to take art and a couple of other subjects with the public school kids.
well lets take the case of the impoverished student. their parents can't pay for their education fully. so are we to condemn them to not having a chance to be successful? to me that sounds more like an aristocratic system to where no one but the wealthy have the right an education
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Never knew any home schoolers when I was in school. The ones I have met since can manage to use "sir, mam, please, thank you" and make eye contact. So they easily move up on my list compared to many of the public schoolers I met. Public school can be fine but too many parents use it as a crutch.
well lets take the case of the impoverished student. their parents can't pay for their education fully. so are we to condemn them to not having a chance to be successful? to me that sounds more like an aristocratic system to where no one but the wealthy have the right an education
Posted via VolNation Mobile
The impoversished student and his family need to get involved in a church or some other local community organization that will further their education, if that is what they desire. Instead we just drop these kids off at a brick building everyday, pretend some educating is happening, and continue to render the family and the network surrounding the family to be more meaningless.
once again where does the money come for EVERY impoverished student?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
once again where does the money come for EVERY impoverished student?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
you don't do it for every one since all are different. Do you force calculus on every student no matter what? Not all benefit from it like they would alternative ed. which is better than leaving not very smart kids in the hands of most of our public school teachers (many of them no smarter than the kids they teach)
While it may be nice to think that EVERY person should be afforded EQUAL situations, it's just not feasible.
Government would have to restrict freedoms via excessive taxation to accomplish this. In the end, all would lose their choice and society as a whole would be worse off.
While I'm not advocating a complete lack of a safety net the notion of a complete safety net is flawed.
well what do you mean by alternative education? and at what level are you refering. all students should go through elementary education however I think when they get to a certain level they should go either towards a college prep type school or vocational school. also, are you saying that all ps teachers are bad? if so that is stupid stereotype
Posted via VolNation Mobile
they've talked about opening voc schools back up in chattanooga, because of the lack of skilled laborers.
This is ridiculous. If any white preacher were to say "get off welfare velcro hair" it'd be an international incident. This is what is going to drive the wedge deeper in race relations.
yup. after all that talk about progress this one jackass makes a stupid comment and it sturs things up. it just shows that people have a hidden agenda. how could anyone think that wouldn't cause an issue. did anyone read his speech prior?
Posted via VolNation Mobile