Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ???

#403
#403
BowlBrother85 said:
It doesn't matter if they are publicly traded. They are not run by the government.

That is ridiculous.

RFK Jr. and those like him are free to post all of their beliefs concerning vaccines on Twitter if they want ... If he wants to contend that there is mercury in children's vaccines that is causing autism and causing them to be trans-gender? He can do that on Twitter. Elon would probably blow him kisses. There are many conspiracy-friendly platforms to choose from. YouTube doesn't want that element on their platform and that is their choice to make.
Click to expand...
No no different in “state run” and “publicly traded” when it comes to allowed information as long it conforms. Seems the left is now using “conspiracy” as the new trendy term when it goes against their thinking or what to think way of thinking. It used to be “fascist” or “white supremacist”. Again, isn’t it the left that is anti-pharmaceutical control? Censoring someone who questions pharmaceutical guidelines, testing or results isn’t necessarily a conspiracy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#404
#404
BowlBrother85 said:
Does this model bother you when Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson follow it?
Click to expand...
How so? Has Hannity’s episodes been removed? I can choose to watch those episodes because they are available for me to view or listen to. Which is the point. I make the choice, not told what the choice is.
 
#405
#405
Orangeburst said:
i am not going to sit here and post back and forth
a federal judge just prohibited Biden from doing this…not going on a network and discussing something
****ing stupid comparison
Click to expand...
Oh. Wow. I've angered you enough that you have to use asterisks. I must have hit close to home.
 
#406
#406
Majors said:
No no different in “state run” and “publicly traded” when it comes to allowed information as long it conforms. Seems the left is now using “conspiracy” as the new trendy term when it goes against their thinking or what to think way of thinking. It used to be “fascist” or “white supremacist”. Again, isn’t it the left that is anti-pharmaceutical control? Censoring someone who questions pharmaceutical guidelines, testing or results isn’t necessarily a conspiracy.
Click to expand...
If you don't understand the difference between state-run media and YouTube? Then that makes you a fool.

YouTube has the discretion to control content.

RFK Jr. is spreading lies when says that mercury is used in children's vaccines. PERIOD
 
#407
#407
Majors said:
How so? Has Hannity’s episodes been removed? I can choose to watch those episodes because they are available for me to view or listen to. Which is the point. I make the choice, not told what the choice is.
Click to expand...
Hannity tells his audience what to think. He personally attacks those who disagree with him.
 
#410
#410
BowlBrother85 said:
If you don't understand the difference between state-run media and YouTube? Then that makes you a fool.

YouTube has the discretion to control content.

RFK Jr. is spreading lies when says that mercury is used in children's vaccines. PERIOD
Click to expand...
A fool would be being told what to think, can we agree on that. And by taking videos down by opposing parties or candidates is pretty communist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, VolinWayne and Caculator
#412
#412
I have some thoughts and questions on this. Did the govt force these platforms to take these things down? Did they suggest it? Did they merely say, "we believe this is false information?" and the company then decided to take it down. If Fox doesn't air a negative story about Trump, based on Trump's conversations with Hannity, is it different.

Edit: just to clarify... I don't think the WH or FBI should be telling any media outlet to take anything down. I don't have a problem with a govt entity stating their position on something to one of these companies and that company making a decision based on that input. How much govt input is acceptable?

Example without the political overtones... WSJ gets wind that the FBI is investigating somebody for planning a bad thing, FBI says reporting this could result in acceleration of bad thing before we can get bad guy and people will get hurt, WSJ sits on story.
 
Last edited:
#413
#413
Majors said:
A fool would be being told what to think, can we agree on that. And by taking videos down by opposing parties or candidates is pretty communist.
Click to expand...
YouTube's policy has nothing to do with politics, or with politicians. They don't allow provable misinformation concerning health care on their platform.
 
#414
#414
I'm really interested in getting some of the back story on how being a publicly traded company is or not relevant here. Not finding much online. Anybody want to educate me? What are the rules that are different for privately owned companies?
 
#415
#415
BowlBrother85 said:
YouTube's policy has nothing to do with politics, or with politicians. They don't allow provable misinformation concerning health care on their platform.
Click to expand...
But allow videos on six feel social distancing, two weeks quarantine and Fauci on the lab leak theory. Weird that this is still up although proven wrong…if they don’t allow provable misinformation in regards to healthcare.

 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#416
#416
Majors said:
But allow videos on six feel social distancing, two weeks quarantine and Fauci on the lab leak theory. Weird that this is still up although proven wrong…if they don’t allow provable misinformation in regards to healthcare.

Click to expand...

You are drawing false equivalencies now. It's a frequent tactic of the right.
 
#417
#417
clarksvol00 said:
I'm really interested in getting some of the back story on how being a publicly traded company is or not relevant here. Not finding much online. Anybody want to educate me? What are the rules that are different for privately owned companies?
Click to expand...
There aren't. The First Amendment only applies to government censorship.
 
#418
#418
BowlBrother85 said:
You are drawing false equivalencies now. It's a frequent tactic of the right.
Click to expand...
How is that, I was able to pull it from YouTube? It should have been pulled under your replies today. Pretty easy google search and there it was….lies or “provable misinformation” as you stated.
 
#419
#419
BowlBrother85 said:
YouTube's policy has nothing to do with politics, or with politicians. They don't allow provable misinformation concerning health care on their platform.
Click to expand...
There is your sign.

"public misinformation"

Who decides if not the public

you can run but you can't hide the truth no matter how you lable it
 
#420
#420
Caculator said:
There is your sign.

"public misinformation"

Who decides if not the public

you can run but you can't hide the truth no matter how you lable it
Click to expand...
Did bb change his post? I don't see the word "public" in the post you replied to. I see "provable misinformation" though.
 
#421
#421
clarksvol00 said:
Did bb change his post? I don't see the word "public" in the post you replied to. I see "provable misinformation" though.
Click to expand...

Provable

You unconfused now?

"Joe Biden's White House successfully pressured Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook and Instagram platforms into censoring and/or removing content related to COVID-19 vaccines, including "humorous or satirical jokes" and even "true information about side effects".
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#422
#422
Caculator said:
Provable

You unconfused now?

"Joe Biden's White House successfully pressured Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook and Instagram platforms into censoring and/or removing content related to COVID-19 vaccines, including "humorous or satirical jokes" and even "true information about side effects".
Click to expand...
More confused. Public opinion determines what a company considers provable or not?
 
Last edited:
#423
#423
Majors said:
How is that, I was able to pull it from YouTube? It should have been pulled under your replies today. Pretty easy google search and there it was….lies or “provable misinformation” as you stated.
Click to expand...
You were drawing false equivalencies ... You often do.
 
#424
#424
BowlBrother85 said:
You were drawing false equivalencies ... You often do.
Click to expand...

It’s not false…you said in regards to YouTube “ They don't allow provable misinformation concerning health care on their platform.” I just confirmed, you don’t know what you’re talking about.
 
#425
#425
Majors said:
It’s not false…you said in regards to YouTube “ They don't allow provable misinformation concerning health care on their platform.” I just confirmed, you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Click to expand...
God bless .... You are so slow ... the equivalencies you were making were false (meaning not applicable with the comparison being made).
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top