Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ???

#378
#378
BowlBrother85 said:
How does YouTube removing a video from their platform in any way constitute "election interference?" Are you saying that a private company such as YouTube, can't enforce their terms of service, just because the subject involved is running for President?

... and are you seriously trying to draw attention to a political bias on the part of YouTube, by linking an interview conducted by James O'Keefe (Project Veritas), which had been posted on The Gateway Pundit?
Click to expand...

So you’re for candidates not being able to get their message out on social media platforms to American voters? Being owned by Google an information search engine somehow makes them private?
 
#379
#379
Majors said:
So you’re for candidates not being able to get their message out on social media platforms to American voters? Being owned by Google an information search engine somehow makes them private?
Click to expand...
If those candidates wish to use the platform, then they should follow the rules of the platform just like everyone else. That is not an infringement on First Amendment rights. Google/YouTube is not the government. The "election interference" argument is just a crutch, for those people who don't want to abide by the rules of the platform, which the forum administrator has every right to establish and enforce.
 
#380
#380
BowlBrother85 said:
If those candidates wish to use the platform, then they should follow the rules of the platform just like everyone else. That is not an infringement on First Amendment rights. Google/YouTube is not the government. The "election interference" argument is just a crutch, for those people who don't want to abide by the rules of the platform, which the forum administrator has every right to establish and enforce.
Click to expand...
He questions big pharma and it’s deemed misinformation? Aren’t the democrats all for free speech or does this fall under believe what you’re told to believe? Always thought the left was pro questioning big banks, big pharma and big corporations….that theory seems to be disinformation to their voters. Google/YouTube is not the government but they play a role in American voters being able to have access to all information. Having selective information is what China and North Korea do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne and davethevol
#382
#382
Majors said:
He questions big pharma and it’s deemed misinformation? Aren’t the democrats all for free speech or does this fall under believe what you’re told to believe? Always thought the left was pro questioning big banks, big pharma and big corporations….that theory seems to be disinformation to their voters. Google/YouTube is not the government but they play a role in American voters being able to have access to all information. Having selective information is what China and North Korea do.
Click to expand...
The forum administrator has the right to establish rules for their forum and enforce them. YouTube is not the only forum where a candidate can "get their message out." If a candidate thinks YouTube's rules are unfair? Then they should try another platform. Truth Social will allow anything ... so use that instead. This is not a violation of anyone's First Amendment rights. PERIOD.
 
#384
#384
BowlBrother85 said:
The forum administrator has the right to establish rules for their forum and enforce them. YouTube is not the only forum where a candidate can "get their message out." If a candidate thinks YouTube's rules are unfair? Then they should try another platform. Truth Social will allow anything ... so use that instead. This is not a violation of anyone's First Amendment rights. PERIOD.
Click to expand...
So it’s pick and choose which information is deemed correct and the pulled. And once you jumped the shark to a free message board it showed you don’t agree with it at least comes across as you tapping out. Last time I checked, Google is a publicly traded company so they can’t hide behind the “privately traded company” excuse.

Seems as though an old school democrat is being suppressed. Why not let him talk and have the people decide what’s credible and not. Perfect example of why we have distrust among Washington and those connected professionally through technology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#385
#385
Majors said:
So it’s pick and choose which information is deemed correct and the pulled.
Click to expand...
Yes, it's their forum. If you don't like their rules? Use another platform.

Majors said:
Last time I checked, Google is a publicly traded company so they can’t hide behind the “privately traded company” excuse.
Click to expand...
It's not an excuse. The First Amendment only applies to government censorship. Google is not the government.
 
#386
#386
Caculator said:
It's more than a violation of first amendment rights when the POTUS demands censorship by that entity

We know that happened with Covid 19 "misinformation" and it is continuing
Click to expand...
If you think that? Then you don't understand the First Amendment.
 
#387
#387
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes, it's their forum. If you don't like their rules? Use another platform.
Click to expand...
so by “it’s their forum” they can transform an election based on their views of which information is credible. Because “it’s their forum”. No different than North Korea news, because it’s “their forum”on news getting to their people.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85, AM64 and VolinWayne
#388
#388
Majors said:
so by “it’s their forum” they can transform election a based on their views of which information is credible. Because “it’s their forum”. No different than North Korea news, because it’s “their forum”on news getting to their people.
Click to expand...
Except that YouTube isn’t the only source of information available in the US.
 
#389
#389
MG1968 said:
Except that YouTube isn’t the only source of information available in the US.
Click to expand...
And? Close to 3B users, it’s a valuable tool for information for everyone including the younger generation of voters. Seems it’s audience it being told what to think.
 
#390
#390
Majors said:
so by “it’s their forum” they can transform election a based on their views of which information is credible.
Click to expand...
How do they "transform an election" exactly? LOL.
Majors said:
No different than North Korea news, because it’s “their forum”on news getting to their people.
Click to expand...
It's entirely different than North Korea. YouTube is not state-run. An adult should not need for that to be explained.
 
#391
#391
BowlBrother85 said:
How do they "transform an election" exactly? LOL.

It's entirely different than North Korea. YouTube is not state-run. An adult should not need for that to be explained.
Click to expand...
That’s right, I’ve stated Google (publicly traded) owns YouTube but is adopting the model of we tell you what is true.

You transform an election by quieting opposition. If you have nothing to fear, let them speak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#393
#393
Majors said:
That’s right, I’ve stated Google (publicly traded) owns YouTube but is adopting the model of we tell you what is true.

You transform an election by quieting opposition. If you have nothing to fear, let them speak.
Click to expand...
It doesn't matter if they are publicly traded. They are not run by the government.

That is ridiculous.

RFK Jr. and those like him are free to post all of their beliefs concerning vaccines on Twitter if they want ... If he wants to contend that there is mercury in children's vaccines that is causing autism and causing them to be trans-gender? He can do that on Twitter. Elon would probably blow him kisses. There are many conspiracy-friendly platforms to choose from. YouTube doesn't want that element on their platform and that is their choice to make.
 
#394
#394
Majors said:
And? Close to 3B users, it’s a valuable tool for information for everyone including the younger generation of voters. Seems it’s audience it being told what to think.
Click to expand...
So are the audiences of Fox News, Prison Planet, and Pajamas Media. It’s still not censorship.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top