Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ???

God bless .... You are so slow ... the equivalencies you were making were false (meaning not applicable with the comparison being made).
Except you said YouTube pulls those things…because it’s their platform. Seems you’re dancing and backtracking.Fauci cannot be questioned but RFK Jr can be under your logic.
 
Except you said YouTube pulls those things…because it’s their platform. Seems you’re dancing and backtracking.Fauci cannot be questioned but RFK Jr can be under your logic.
False Equivalence: The Problem with Unreasonable Comparisons – Effectiviology

RFK Jr. and Dr. Anthony Fauci are not equivalent to each other. Dr. Fauci can certainly be questioned, but he is not on the same plane as RFK Jr. in terms of health care credentials, especially as it pertains to immunology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and AM64
Sure they are…both according to the YouTube guidelines told disinformation and that’s the topic. One is still up and one was taken down.
I feel like it is beneath me to respond to you ....

They are not comparable with each other, and the medical opinions they have given are not comparable with each other. I'm not wasting any more time with you. You are think and slow ... and everything revolves around tribal politics.
 
I feel like it is beneath me to respond to you ....

They are not comparable with each other, and the medical opinions they have given are not comparable with each other. I'm not wasting any more time with you. You are think and slow ... and everything revolves around tribal politics.

“You are think and slow” . Well that’s a new one. Especially when the pontifical side of you gets exposed. It’s not tribal politics as RFK Jr. is a Dem and well let me say, I am not. You made a stance, it got exposed as you didn’t know what the hell you’re talking about in regards to YouTube and then danced.
 
“You are think and slow” . Well that’s a new one. Especially when the pontifical side of you gets exposed. It’s not tribal politics as RFK Jr. is a Dem and well let me say, I am not. You made a stance, it got exposed as you didn’t know what the hell you’re talking about in regards to YouTube and then danced.
RFK Jr. is not an MD. He is not a health care professional. He has never been employed in the health care industry in any capacity. He is not a scientist. He has never worked in a laboratory or conducted scientific research. He is no way qualified to discuss the safety of vaccinations, and yet, he speaks as though he is an expert in the field.

The reason the right-wing likes him so much has nothing to do with his medical credentials. He doesn't have any!
 
RFK Jr. is not an MD. He is not a health care professional. He has never been employed in the health care industry in any capacity. He is not a scientist. He has never worked in a laboratory or conducted scientific research. He is no way qualified to discuss the safety of vaccinations, and yet, he speaks as though he is an expert in the field.

The reason the right-wing likes him so much has nothing to do with his medical credentials. He doesn't have any!
Never said he was a MD. My stance has been he questioned science and was pulled. Fauci was wrong in his science and still up. Not sure why MD matters if you’re wrong. If anything, should be more accountability towards the MD.
 
Never said he was a MD. My stance has been he questioned science and was pulled. Fauci was wrong in his science and still up. Not sure why MD matters if you’re wrong. If anything, should be more accountability towards the MD.
I'm not getting into a debate over Dr. Fauci. He had a long and distinguished career. Not everything he said was completely accurate ... but the right-wing has overblown a great deal. If you don't think credentials matter when giving opinions concerning health care? Well, that makes you an idiot. I'm done with this.

RFK Jr. is not qualified to give the medical opinions which the right-wing is licking his balls over.
 
I'm not getting into a debate over Dr. Fauci. He had a long and distinguished career. Not everything he said was completely accurate ... but the right-wing has overblown a great deal. If you don't think credentials matter when giving opinions concerning health care? Well, that makes you an idiot. I'm done with this.

RFK Jr. is not qualified to give the medical opinions which the right-wing is licking his balls over.
Inaccurate career in the end. His legacy in history is the covid debacle and his attachment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeBoro
Inaccurate career in the end. His legacy in history is the covid debacle and his attachment.
Because you say so? LOL. What the hell do you know? Seriously ... you want to prop up RFK Jr. as some type of authority on immunology.

... and I don't think you are capable of assessing the matter from any perspective other than that of a right-wing political agenda.
 
Because you say so? LOL. What the hell do you know? Seriously ... you want to prop up RFK Jr. as some type of authority on immunology.

... and I don't think you are capable of assessing the matter from any perspective other than that of a right-wing political agenda.
I’m propping up free speech and questioning big tech on information that is allowed and not allowed. Just happens RFK Jr is of the opposing party…not sure that is deemed right-wing political agenda on my end.
 
Because you say so? LOL. What the hell do you know? Seriously ... you want to prop up RFK Jr. as some type of authority on immunology.

... and I don't think you are capable of assessing the matter from any perspective other than that of a right-wing political agenda.


Haha And we all know that you are are incapable of assessing the matter from any perspective other than that of a left-wing political agenda.
 
Because you say so? LOL. What the hell do you know? Seriously ... you want to prop up RFK Jr. as some type of authority on immunology.

... and I don't think you are capable of assessing the matter from any perspective other than that of a right-wing political agenda.

Because it’s true. Fauci said a lot of things that he knew not to be “the science”. He ran down anyone with a contrary opinion (in opposition to how “the science” really works). He lied to Congress as well about funding to the lab where COVID originated.

Someone in his role is going to miss from time to time. But he missed on some really big things that did enormous damage to the economy that we still haven’t fully recovered from.

What is not excusable was his arrogance, his outright lies, and his hostility to anyone who wouldn’t go along with his proclamations. If you doubt this, never forget he claimed to be “the science”. He will be remembered for his arrogant **** ups and that he preferred politics over science.

And I don’t see @Majors propping up RFK Jr. just rightly pointing out how bizarre it is that his opinions (no matter how wacky) get censored while proven mistruths from Fauci remain. It is logical to question the motivations.
 
RFK Jr. and Dr. Anthony Fauci are not equivalent to each other. Dr. Fauci can certainly be questioned, but he is not on the same plane as RFK Jr. in terms of health care credentials, especially as it pertains to immunology.

Correct. I hold Fauci at a higher level than RFK Jr. to speak the truth no matter the forum. That was part of his job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Majors
Because it’s true. Fauci said a lot of things that he knew not to be “the science”. He ran down anyone with a contrary opinion (in opposition to how “the science” really works). He lied to Congress as well about funding to the lab where COVID originated.

Someone in his role is going to miss from time to time. But he missed on some really big things that did enormous damage to the economy that we still haven’t fully recovered from.

What is not excusable was his arrogance, his outright lies, and his hostility to anyone who wouldn’t go along with his proclamations. If you doubt this, never forget he claimed to be “the science”. He will be remembered for his arrogant **** ups and that he preferred politics over science.

And I don’t see @Majors propping up RFK Jr. just rightly pointing out how bizarre it is that his opinions (no matter how wacky) get censored while proven mistruths from Fauci remain. It is logical to question the motivations.

even worse,,intentionally lying and censoring truth
big pile of steaming ****
 
Because it’s true. Fauci said a lot of things that he knew not to be “the science”. He ran down anyone with a contrary opinion (in opposition to how “the science” really works). He lied to Congress as well about funding to the lab where COVID originated.
You are doing some mind-reading here ... and making it political, which suggests an agenda of your own.
Someone in his role is going to miss from time to time. But he missed on some really big things that did enormous damage to the economy that we still haven’t fully recovered from.
That's really nothing but an opinion ... on which people will disagree. Again, your perspective is from politics.
What is not excusable was his arrogance, his outright lies, and his hostility to anyone who wouldn’t go along with his proclamations. If you doubt this, never forget he claimed to be “the science”. He will be remembered for his arrogant **** ups and that he preferred politics over science.
Tribal political perspective ... and over-emotional. This won't sway anyone.
And I don’t see @Majors propping up RFK Jr. just rightly pointing out how bizarre it is that his opinions (no matter how wacky) get censored while proven mistruths from Fauci remain. It is logical to question the motivations.
Of course, the opinions of an unqualified person are more likely too be censored when they are espousing misinformation. You refer to "mistruths" from Fauci which are just your own political bias and conjecture.
 
Haha And we all know that you are are incapable of assessing the matter from any perspective other than that of a left-wing political agenda.
"No puppet. No puppet. You're the puppet." LOL.

Tell us more about how the 2020 election was rigged .... or better still, save it for November of 2024.
 
Because it’s true. Fauci said a lot of things that he knew not to be “the science”. He ran down anyone with a contrary opinion (in opposition to how “the science” really works). He lied to Congress as well about funding to the lab where COVID originated.

Someone in his role is going to miss from time to time. But he missed on some really big things that did enormous damage to the economy that we still haven’t fully recovered from.

What is not excusable was his arrogance, his outright lies, and his hostility to anyone who wouldn’t go along with his proclamations. If you doubt this, never forget he claimed to be “the science”. He will be remembered for his arrogant **** ups and that he preferred politics over science.

And I don’t see @Majors propping up RFK Jr. just rightly pointing out how bizarre it is that his opinions (no matter how wacky) get censored while proven mistruths from Fauci remain. It is logical to question the motivations.
You’re a gentlemen and a scholar with this post! Well said.
 
RFK Jr. is not an MD. He is not a health care professional. He has never been employed in the health care industry in any capacity. He is not a scientist. He has never worked in a laboratory or conducted scientific research. He is no way qualified to discuss the safety of vaccinations, and yet, he speaks as though he is an expert in the field.

The reason the right-wing likes him so much has nothing to do with his medical credentials. He doesn't have any!

In the same light it's doubtful that MDs study fluid dynamics in the sense that they wouldn't have a background in how fluids (including gasses) move and how particulate matter moves with the fluids. I actually started thinking about the comparison of ejected droplets as similar to the way in nuclear analysis one would calculate the distribution of ejected neutrons following a fission event (fairly complex spatial and time dependent calculus equations); then I realized that the virus is ejected in vapor droplets of varying size and those droplets evaporate (losing energy and momentum but gaining buoyancy). That introduces more complexity into the distribution. I can't see either Kennedy or most MDs being experts on viral distribution; MDs certainly may have some statistical rule of thumb regarding airborne viral uptake dependent on distance or contact, but it's definitely a complex matter.

MDs would certainly have courses on how blood moves in arteries and vessels - not diminishing that, but fluid flow can be far more complex than what happens through a conduit. Blood clots form in areas of stagnation so all MDs would have more understanding of fluid dynamics than the population in general. It's just that there is fluid dynamics and then there IS fluid dynamics - that and heat transfer are two of the more intense and difficult engineering fields of study.
 
Last edited:
In the same light it's doubtful that MDs study fluid dynamics in the sense that they wouldn't have a background in how fluids (including gasses) move and how particulate matter moves with the fluids. I actually started thinking about the comparison of ejected droplets as similar to the way in nuclear analysis one would calculate the distribution of ejected neutrons following a fission event (fairly complex spatial and time dependent calculus equations); then I realized that the virus is ejected in vapor droplets of varying size and those droplets evaporate (losing energy and momentum but gaining buoyancy). That introduces more complexity into the distribution. I can't see either Kennedy or most MDs being experts on viral distribution; MDs certainly may have some statistical rule of thumb regarding airborne viral uptake dependent on distance or contact, but it's definitely a complex matter.

MDs would certainly have courses on how blood moves in arteries and vessels - not diminishing that, but fluid flow can be far more complex than what happens through a conduit. Blood clots form in areas of stagnation so all MDs would have more understanding of fluid dynamics than the population in general. It's just that there is fluid dynamics and then there IS fluid dynamics - that and heat transfer are two of the more intense and difficult engineering fields of study.
Gee ... That was so interesting.

... there is nothing in RFK Jr.'s background which would give him any useful insight into immunology and/or vaccines. He speaks only from the standpoint of a blind distrust of science and of institutions. He has no credentials on the subject matter ... and yet, the right wing takes him seriously - because he says things that you enjoy hearing. It would be comical, if it wasn't likely that children were being left unvaccinated as a result of this idiot's ignorant ramblings.
 
Fauci lied about funding (admitted by NIH), committed perjury, lied about natural immunity, origin, the effectiveness of the vaccine..etc.
I am trying to remember if anything he said was truthful.
 
Gee ... That was so interesting.

... there is nothing in RFK Jr.'s background which would give him any useful insight into immunology and/or vaccines. He speaks only from the standpoint of a blind distrust of science and of institutions. He has no credentials on the subject matter ... and yet, the right wing takes him seriously - because he says things that you enjoy hearing. It would be comical, if it wasn't likely that children were being left unvaccinated as a result of this idiot's ignorant ramblings.

I can't imagine anyone taking a Kennedy seriously - especially anyone right of center, but then I mostly ignore politicians anyway. When you get right down to it, we only choose from an assortment of arrogant egotists who have the money and backing to show up as candidates. Most of them get sorted out before they ever make it to this part of the country. Sometimes I'm not convinced if we vote on the dregs or if the dregs were the ones weeded out. Generally it seems like most candidates somehow commit political suicide by flapping their jaws too many times and save us some of the weeding out.

I'm old enough to have been in HS when Kennedy was elected, so I'm a bit jaded when it comes to the Kennedys in the first place. I prefer politicians in single for a short period of time and certainly not in family bunches - that's way too much like aristocracy and monarchy for my taste.
 
In the same light it's doubtful that MDs study fluid dynamics in the sense that they wouldn't have a background in how fluids (including gasses) move and how particulate matter moves with the fluids. I actually started thinking about the comparison of ejected droplets as similar to the way in nuclear analysis one would calculate the distribution of ejected neutrons following a fission event (fairly complex spatial and time dependent calculus equations); then I realized that the virus is ejected in vapor droplets of varying size and those droplets evaporate (losing energy and momentum but gaining buoyancy). That introduces more complexity into the distribution. I can't see either Kennedy or most MDs being experts on viral distribution; MDs certainly may have some statistical rule of thumb regarding airborne viral uptake dependent on distance or contact, but it's definitely a complex matter.

MDs would certainly have courses on how blood moves in arteries and vessels - not diminishing that, but fluid flow can be far more complex than what happens through a conduit. Blood clots form in areas of stagnation so all MDs would have more understanding of fluid dynamics than the population in general. It's just that there is fluid dynamics and then there IS fluid dynamics - that and heat transfer are two of the more intense and difficult engineering fields of study.

Five bucks says that went right over his head.
 

VN Store



Back
Top