Roe vs Wade Overturned

[RikidyBones]

No, he just said people should be second class citizens when the state is done with them.

No he didn't. Making things up isn't going to sway or endear anyone to your position.

 

[0nelilreb]

You're talking to a dude that has shown no capability to actually read anything or address nuance.

It’s almost like they ( politicians and media ) use the same plays from the same worn out book every single election cycle . Can’t wait to see how they are going to spin the “ you’re a racist if you don’t vote for this bill “ that I’m sure is coming up soon .

 

[zeppelin128]

No he didn't. Making things up isn't going to sway or endear anyone to your position.

That is exactly what he did.

 

[zeppelin128]

You're talking to a dude that has shown no capability to actually read anything or address nuance.

This an accidental self-own?

 

[RikidyBones]

That is exactly what he did.

It isn't. Quit being a boob.

 

[0nelilreb]

That is exactly what he did.

By that logic did he not just make them an elite class in states like NY, and Cal., when those states get done with them ?

 

[Vol8188]

SCOTUS Clarence Thomas made his intentions very clear.

I think you're misunderstanding. Are you under the illusion that Thomas wants to ban or even has the power to ban anything?

Plus Thomas is 1 of 9.

 

[Vol8188]

No, he just said people should be second class citizens when the state is done with them.

No he didn't. Now you're just making things up.

 

[zeppelin128]

By that logic did he not just make them an elite class in states like NY, and Cal., when those states get done with them ?

No. Receiving the same treatment and benefits is not asking for special privileges .

 

[Vol8188]

No. Receiving the same treatment and benefits is not asking for special privileges .

What are they not receiving?

 

[ButchPlz]

I think you're misunderstanding. Are you under the illusion that Thomas wants to ban or even has the power to ban anything?

Plus Thomas is 1 of 9.

And again a real life civics failure. Fascinating that he goes after the one black justice that ruled on it. It's apparent that we've identified another actual full-blooded racist.

 

[0nelilreb]

No. Receiving the same treatment and benefits is not asking for special privileges .

If these states change their laws to give even more access than they had to a specific set , it will be . I don’t think he asked the states to create either more or less access , I think he just said that it’s up to the citizens of the state to decide that instead of the Feds .

 

[zeppelin128]

If these states change their laws to give even more access than they had to a specific set , it will be . I don’t think he asked the states to create either more or less access , I think he just said that it’s up to the citizens of the state to decide that instead of the Feds .

"State's Rights" falls apart when you think about it. Should some American citizens be less than others?

 

[0nelilreb]

"State's Rights" falls apart when you think about it. Should some American citizens be less than others?

Absolutely not ( with constitutional rights ) and if you can prove a state is doing that, then you will be in front of the same SCOTUS judges smiling as they rule in your favor .

 

[zeppelin128]

Absolutely not ( with constitutional rights ) and if you can prove a state is doing that, then you will be in front of the same SCOTUS judges smiling as they rule in your favor .

Yet y'all support this exact thing...

 

[Weezer]

Yet y'all support this exact thing...

What exact thing? The right of states to self-govern rather than be subject to an overreaching federal government?

 

[0nelilreb]

Yet y'all support this exact thing...

I support any citizen that is having their constitutional rights taken from them by government .

 

[Weezer]

Why do some believe government should be involved in every aspect of everyday life?

 

[zeppelin128]

What exact thing? The right of states to self-govern rather than be subject to an overreaching federal government?

So to be clear, you are okay with different rights for folks. I didn't take you as that kind of guy that supports treating people differently because they don't fit the mold. That's a shame. Hope I'm reading you wrong.

 

[hog88]

The cruelty is the point.

The stupidity of the legislation and vote is the point. It’s a state issue so the entire vote was pointless and nothing but theater, besides there’s not 1 state that will ban birth control.

 

[hog88]

SCOTUS Clarence Thomas made his intentions very clear.

Good thing Thomas doesn’t write state laws.

 

[hog88]

No, he just said people should be second class citizens when the state is done with them.

You’re better than this hysteria Zepp. Leave that to LG.

 

[hog88]

"State's Rights" falls apart when you think about it. Should some American citizens be less than others?

Doesn’t the federal government make that clear already?

 

[zeppelin128]

Good thing Thomas doesn’t write state laws.

Nope, he just gives free reign to step on everybody else.

 

[utvolpj]

So to be clear, you are okay with different rights for folks. I didn't take you as that kind of guy that supports treating people differently because they don't fit the mold. That's a shame. Hope I'm reading you wrong.

Should states/municipalities be allowed to set their own income tax and other tax structures?