Rumors floating around Oxford

#51
#51
tyler played 5 more minutes a game almost than terrico so in 5 minutes, add 2 ppg 1 rpg 1 apg. those are pretty modest additions to but jus to be safe. now add tose to his game averages and tell me wat you get.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

5 more minutes? Where the heck did you pull that number out of wow? He played 1.8 minutes more on average - once again in a way better conference.

And those are modest additions? Lol - talk about hypothetical. You're so full of it. He wasn't on the same level as Tyler his freshman year - get over it.
 
#53
#53
Actually - I was wrong. Tyler Smith shot a better percentage from 2-point land.

Tyler: 2-point FG % was .437% White: 2-point FG % was .428%

So the only stat he was better at was his 3-point %

Tyler: 3-point % was .258% White: 3-point % was .354%

So you're trying to say he was as good as Tyler as a freshman because he shot the three almost as good as Scotty Hopson? Someone like Scotty would have made his stats look pretty modest as well if he got the minutes he did. Green and Bost were both better freshman - and Fortson/Walker are up there too.
 
Last edited:
#54
#54
you showed how much terrico shot and where itranked on the team and said thats why his numbers were so good, how much did tyler shoot as a frosh and whered his rank on the team, ad dont lie because i know te answer.ok you wana be technical terrico played 30mpg tyler 33 thats 3 more mpg. in 30 mpg terrico put up almost 15ppg so 1 point every 2 mins. so add 1.5 ppg to his total. he avg almost 4rpg thats 1 rebound about every 7 mins so add .5 rpg to his total. he avg about 3apg thats 1 every 10 min so add .3 apg to his total. now make the changes and put the numbers together, very close. also, your not factoring in tyler has an extra year of experience so in a sense he isnt a true freshman like terrico, so yes tylers game should be a little better eve though the numbers dont say he is. iowa was probably better, but not enough to prove your whole arguement and say if terrico played foriowa he wuld be garbage.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#55
#55
so your saying a freshman that plays alot of mins should put up tyler or terricos numbers. so wha about ramar and duke crews, there frosh numbers werent nearly those and they had alot of opportunities???
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#56
#56
you showed how much terrico shot and where itranked on the team and said thats why his numbers were so good, how much did tyler shoot as a frosh and whered his rank on the team, ad dont lie because i know te answer.ok you wana be technical terrico played 30mpg tyler 33 thats 3 more mpg. in 30 mpg terrico put up almost 15ppg so 1 point every 2 mins. so add 1.5 ppg to his total. he avg almost 4rpg thats 1 rebound about every 7 mins so add .5 rpg to his total. he avg about 3apg thats 1 every 10 min so add .3 apg to his total. now make the changes and put the numbers together, very close. also, your not factoring in tyler has an extra year of experience so in a sense he isnt a true freshman like terrico, so yes tylers game should be a little better eve though the numbers dont say he is. iowa was probably better, but not enough to prove your whole arguement and say if terrico played foriowa he wuld be garbage.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Oh my goodness. You have to be kidding me if you want to get into all this hypothetical crap. He would have scored this many more if he had an extra minute and a half per game. Haha, really?

And both Tyler and White attempted the 2nd most shots on their team - you were correct on that. And since when does 13.7 ppg equal almost 15 ppg - lol. And 3.4 rebounds per game rounds down, not up to 4. Again, 2.3 assist per game equals almost 3 assists?

I suppose we should round his .3 blocks per game to 1 block per game as well.

You said he was as good as Tyler in his FRESHMAN year. You never said - his first year removed from high school. Lol - back tracking now.

And I like how you like to play all of this hypothetical crap when you continue to ignore the fact that Tyler was the far better defensive player and the had the far better conference - not to mention all of his stats were STILL better in playing in the tougher conference. Also - the fact that he was just a better overall player. Talk about an obsessed stats geek here - but the irony is that the stats are against you on this one - and so is the obvious/common sense area of actually watching the two play and being able to tell one is better than the other.
 
Last edited:
#57
#57
so your saying a freshman that plays alot of mins should put up tyler or terricos numbers. so wha about ramar and duke crews, there frosh numbers werent nearly those and they had alot of opportunities???
Posted via VolNation Mobile

What the heck? Are you insane? Where did I say that?

I said good players who didn't get the minutes that White did could also put up the same numbers. Where did I say any crappy/average freshman that plays 30 minutes per game could put up the same numbers?

I used Scotty as an example. He was a very good freshman who put up good numbers and didn't get to play quite as much as White. How in the world do you bring up Ramar/Duke when I brought up guys like Walker/Green/Fortson/Bost who were all very successful this year and imo just as good or better than White. I know Green was.

Just give it up man. You're wrong.
 
Last edited:
#58
#58
im the stats geek ye your pulling numbers too, i dnt get it...and your right freshman is freshman i was just saying tyler should be better. ad add on the numbers ifhe would have played more and there numbers are almost identical. obviouslu tyler will have more blocks and rebounds as terrico wll obviously hae a better 3% and as to to ratio thats common sense. the difference ist that big between them, your biased because of what tyler has done the last 2 years here like i said i doubt, ad i dont care what you say, that you really watched that much of iowa. first off there games are hrdly ever televised around the south so idk where youd see them unless you live in iowa. my orginal post said that he was as good maybe better, i dont think he was better thats why i said maybe, but as good meaning comparable he is definetely that and if you want t deny that because of the cnference he played in then i guess stephon curry should just be considered a towel boy, or tyreke evanss be a water boy. last time i checked you dont have to play in a power cnference t be considered a good player, and the sec is comparable to what the big ten was then. as i said im not saying terrico was better but you trying to say clearly tyler was is a crock of crap. and all tis about him taking over and leading iowa and bla bla bla obviously he wasnt to goodat it since that iowa team amounted t nothing that year.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#59
#59
oh so green bost and fortson, they mus have played in a different cnferece than the sec right? because if they did they played fr crap teams and thats why they were so good they jus got alot of opportunities...good arguement.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#60
#60
im the stats geek ye your pulling numbers too, i dnt get it...and your right freshman is freshman i was just saying tyler should be better. ad add on the numbers ifhe would have played more and there numbers are almost identical. obviouslu tyler will have more blocks and rebounds as terrico wll obviously hae a better 3% and as to to ratio thats common sense. the difference ist that big between them, your biased because of what tyler has done the last 2 years here like i said i doubt, ad i dont care what you say, that you really watched that much of iowa. first off there games are hrdly ever televised around the south so idk where youd see them unless you live in iowa. my orginal post said that he was as good maybe better, i dont think he was better thats why i said maybe, but as good meaning comparable he is definetely that and if you want t deny that because of the cnference he played in then i guess stephon curry should just be considered a towel boy, or tyreke evanss be a water boy. last time i checked you dont have to play in a power cnference t be considered a good player, and the sec is comparable to what the big ten was then. as i said im not saying terrico was better but you trying to say clearly tyler was is a crock of crap. and all tis about him taking over and leading iowa and bla bla bla obviously he wasnt to goodat it since that iowa team amounted t nothing that year.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

oh so green bost and fortson, they mus have played in a different cnferece than the sec right? because if they did they played fr crap teams and thats why they were so good they jus got alot of opportunities...good arguement.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

You have to be kidding? Something is wrong with you if you can honestly say you got some of this stuff from my posts.

The only reason I bothered with stats is because you're the one that brought them up to begin with and kept whining like a 3-year-old and saying "I'm still waiting for blah-blah-blah" so I provided the stuff and proved you wrong.

And I am sorry you only get basic cable and weren't able to see quite a few of his games at Iowa (although I know several was on the normal ESPN channels as well maybe 3-4).

Once again - you're talking hypothetical crap on how much better his stats would have been with an extra few minutes. That is freakin' hilarious.

There is so much wrong in your post I can't even cover it all. Not to mention you're also posting on your cell phone and you have the grammar and spelling of a 6-year-old when using it.

First off the part that I found the most hilarious - the Big 10 was TWICE as good Tyler's freshman year than the SEC was this past year. Don't freakin' kid yourself - who's the homer?

How do you bring Stephon Curry and Evans into this? That's further proof you're just being a babbling lunatic at this point - you try to take something I say and warp it into something totally off base and untrue. Curry and Evans put up better numbers than either player and are consensus better players - I'm not sure how in the world that is relevant at all? BOTH Curry and Evans played a tougher schedule this year than White did and I guarantee that - or should I pull out their OOC schedules for you, buddy? Either way - it's totally irrelevant to the point.

And the other SEC freshmen you mention all had good freshman years as did White - another bull crap point by you that has nothing to do with this. None of them had better freshman years than Tyler. Green is a better play than White though - why is that hard to understand or grasp? Neither of these guys played in a strong conference but it doesn't change the fact that they aren't good or that Green >>>>> White.

White is not comparable to Tyler after his freshman year. Only a babbling nerd who didn't watch either and only paid attention to stats would make that claim. I never once said White wasn't a good player or that you couldn't be a good player if you played in a bad conference, lol.

With that - I'm done here - I don't feel like arguing with someone who could manage to argue with a wall for days and has too much pride to admit he's wrong. Have fun quoting this post and posting more non-sense - luckily my eyes won't have to bleed anymore thanks to a certain feature here at VN. Have a nice day.
 
Last edited:
#61
#61
You have to be kidding? Something is wrong with you if you can honestly say you got some of this stuff from my posts.

The only reason I bothered with stats is because you're the one that brought them up to begin with and kept whining like a 3-year-old and saying "I'm still waiting for blah-blah-blah" so I provided the stuff and proved you wrong.

And I am sorry you only get basic cable and weren't able to see quite a few of his games at Iowa (although I know several was on the normal ESPN channels as well maybe 3-4).

Once again - you're talking hypothetical crap on how much better his stats would have been with an extra few minutes. That is freakin' hilarious.

There is so much wrong in your post I can't even cover it all. Not to mention you're also posting on your cell phone and you have the grammar and spelling of a 6-year-old when using it.

First off the part that I found the most hilarious - the Big 10 was TWICE as good Tyler's freshman year than the SEC was this past year. Don't freakin' kid yourself - who's the homer?

How do you bring Stephon Curry and Evans into this? That's further proof you're just being a babbling lunatic at this point - you try to take something I say and warp it into something totally off base and untrue. Curry and Evans put up better numbers than either player and are consensus better players - I'm not sure how in the world that is relevant at all? BOTH Curry and Evans played a tougher schedule this year than White did and I guarantee that - or should I pull out their OOC schedules for you, buddy? Either way - it's totally irrelevant to the point.

And the other SEC freshmen you mention all had good freshman years as did White - another bull crap point by you that has nothing to do with this. None of them had better freshman years than Tyler. Green is a better play than White though - why is that hard to understand or grasp? Neither of these guys played in a strong conference but it doesn't change the fact that they aren't good or that Green >>>>> White.

White is not comparable to Tyler after his freshman year. Only a babbling nerd who didn't watch either and only paid attention to stats would make that claim. I never once said White wasn't a good player or that you couldn't be a good player if you played in a bad conference, lol.

With that - I'm done here - I don't feel like arguing with someone who could manage to argue with a wall for days and has too much pride to admit he's wrong. Have fun quoting this post and posting more non-sense - luckily my eyes won't have to bleed anymore thanks to a certain feature here at VN. Have a nice day.

This guy's pretty thick, bassman, and has a history of making stupid statements and then just getting ruffled when you call him out on them. Just tune him out until he works out those kinks.
 
#66
#66
whoever compared White to Tyler is foolish. both are good players but completely different. I followed Ole Miss quite a bit and Terrico really played out of position this season. He's a 2guard and I'm not he had ever played the point before. But he did a great job at the 1 this season for the Rebs
 
#67
#67
Am I the only one disturbed by the fact Terrico is a Freshman in college dating a HS Junior.

Thats sick and illegal.
 
#68
#68
That's two years man. He was probably dating her before he even got to Ole Miss. It may "technically" be illegal but really? Not seeing how that's sick.
 
#69
#69
That's two years man. He was probably dating her before he even got to Ole Miss. It may "technically" be illegal but really? Not seeing how that's sick.
She's 16 and he's 19.

Yeah there is something wrong with that.:crazy:
 
#70
#70
Seriously. 3 years? Nothing wrong with that. There's 3 years between my wife and me. Depending on the time of year, there are 4 years, and we're fine.
 
Last edited:
#71
#71
I'm not seeing it - only problem I see is he's over 18. But when did they start dating?

It's not as uncommon as you may think. I've know a lot of people that are 3 years apart and were in that high school/college transition.
 

VN Store



Back
Top