Sandusky Claims His Innoncence in an Exclusive Interview with Bob Costas

#151
#151
therealUT said:
Can you explain to me why it is wrong? Where is the intent to harm? and/or, where is the harm?
Click to expand...

Where is the harm in a strange grown man showering and "horse playing" with a pre-pubescent boy?

Please tell me you don't actually need this explained.
 
#154
#154
therealUT said:
Morally we don't. According to your norms, constructs, and conventions, you might have a problem.
Click to expand...

Please tell us what YOUR "norms, constructs and conventions" are? That may help us understand where you are coming from.
 
#159
#159
therealUT said:
Can you explain to me why it is wrong? Where is the intent to harm? and/or, where is the harm?
Click to expand...

A grown man taking a shower with a youn boy is wrong. Unless that man is your father and your young. Whst he did is wrong and sick, even that happend to my little brother that man better hide before i find him. So im guessing you think he is innocent.
 
#161
#161
hog88 said:
Please tell us what YOUR "norms, constructs and conventions" are? That may help us understand where you are coming from.
Click to expand...

Do not physically harm other individuals or their property. Do my best to give individuals the benefit of the doubt, since I do not and never can have knowledge of their intent.
 
#162
#162
T Vols 21 said:
A grown man taking a shower with a youn boy is wrong. Unless that man is your father and your young. Whst he did is wrong and sick, even that happend to my little brother that man better hide before i find him. So im guessing you think he is innocent.
Click to expand...

He is innocent until proven guilty of harming another individual.
 
#166
#166
therealUT said:
I do and I want it explained. Feel free to explain it.
Click to expand...

If Sandusky walked up to a young boy at an elementary school playground and whipped his hog out, he'd have broken the law, right?

Explain how being alone, naked, in the shower with a young boy is kosher.
 
#167
#167
therealUT said:
Do not physically harm other individuals or their property. Do my best to give individuals the benefit of the doubt, since I do not and never can have knowledge of their intent.
Click to expand...

In relation to the subject at hand.... Don't weasle.
 
#168
#168
therealUT said:
Morally we don't. According to your norms, constructs, and conventions, you might have a problem.
Click to expand...

truUT, do you have a problem with your fiance cooking me breakfast naked, or not?

Here it's a-ok, now it's a "trust" issue. Why would trust come in to play when there would be nothing wrong with what she's doing?
 
#169
#169
therealUT said:
Morally we don't. According to your norms, constructs, and conventions, you might have a problem.
Click to expand...

I wonder what all of these victims think of Sandusky's "norms, constructs, and conventions". You are taking your argument to the most silly and extreme barriers to try and prove your point. In the end, he may not be found guilty, but grown white haired creepy men showering with boys is ALWAYS wrong, no matter your "constructs". To think otherwise is absolute idiocy.
 
#172
#172
bamawriter said:
If Sandusky walked up to a young boy at an elementary school playground and whipped his hog out, he'd have broken the law, right?

Explain how being alone, naked, in the shower with a young boy is kosher.
Click to expand...

He would have broken the law; he would not necessarily have done anything immoral.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top