Sandusky Claims His Innoncence in an Exclusive Interview with Bob Costas

#179
#179
therealUT said:
I was. I am not now; therefore, I do not order persons.
Click to expand...

Since you like posing hypothetical questions, I've got one for you.

Let's say, as a police officer, you witness a 10 year old boy and a 60 year old man getting naked. They then proceed to head to the shower. Do you, as a police officer, let them go on their merry way without stopping them and asking questions? If the questions are answered, do you continue to let them go on their way?

I just have a really hard time accepting that an officer of the law would think that being naked and alone in a shower with a 10 year old boy is all a matter of your "constructs and norms".
 
#180
#180
hog88 said:
Must have had great OERs....
Click to expand...

Is this more conjecture? I made a statement in the present tense and you are applying that to the past?

I put in my REFRAG packet when I came to the realization that I could not reconcile my outlook on the world with my duties in the Army.
 
#183
#183
SamRebel35 said:
Since you like posing hypothetical questions, I've got one for you.

Let's say, as a police officer, you witness a 10 year old boy and a 60 year old man getting naked. They then proceed to head to the shower. Do you, as a police officer, let them go on their merry way without stopping them and asking questions? If the questions are answered, do you continue to let them go on their way?

I just have a really hard time accepting that an officer of the law would think that being naked and alone in a shower with a 10 year old boy is all a matter of your "constructs and norms".
Click to expand...

I would ask questions. That does not mean I would keep them from showering. I might even sit around in the locker room to be sure that nothing happened. The act itself though, so far as I know is not criminal, and I certainly do not see it as immoral.
 
#184
#184
therealUT said:
Is this more conjecture? I made a statement in the present tense and you are applying that to the past?

I put in my REFRAG packet when I came to the realization that I could not reconcile my outlook on the world with my duties in the Army.
Click to expand...

You are so enlightened. Teach me.
 
#185
#185
therealUT said:
I would ask questions. That does not mean I would keep them from showering. I might even sit around in the locker room to be sure that nothing happened. The act itself though, so far as I know is not criminal, and I certainly do not see it as immoral.
Click to expand...

Wow. I am speechless.
 
#186
#186
therealUT said:
I would ask questions. That does not mean I would keep them from showering. I might even sit around in the locker room to be sure that nothing happened. The act itself though, so far as I know is not criminal, and I certainly do not see it as immoral.
Click to expand...

Why?

I thought you wouldn't be curious. Thought truly good people didn't speculate.
 
#187
#187
therealUT said:
It cannot. Sorry.
Click to expand...

Sure it can. You can rape someone without doing any physical harm. If sexual activity doesn't fall within your sense of "morality", then rape that does no physical harm is no more immoral than a 40 year old man playing around with a 10 year old boy in a shower.
 
#188
#188
therealUT said:
I would ask questions. That does not mean I would keep them from showering. I might even sit around in the locker room to be sure that nothing happened. The act itself though, so far as I know is not criminal, and I certainly do not see it as immoral.
Click to expand...

You contradicted your entire argument about speculation, good people, innocent, et al bs in one statement. If nothing is wrong with it, why do you need to be there to watch to make sure nothing happened?
 
#192
#192
From the indictment it sounds like there were boys that Sandusky showered with and groped without having anal penetration, such as the 1998 victim. Sandusky can get one of these other victims to truthfully state that they showered with Sandusky and were not raped. How does Sandusky remember the identity of this boy on this particular night? Either something traumatic happened that night (getting caught raping a child), or Sandusky kept records of who he showered with and on which dates, otherwise how does he remember who he was with after 9 years.
 
Last edited:
#194
#194
wildnkrazykat said:
Predators remember
Click to expand...
Precisely. If he is not a predator, how does he remember who he was with on which date?

I bet that Sandusky will bring forth a boy other than the one he was with that night. The boy won't be able to remember the exact date. The boy will have aged 9 years, so McQ won't be able to identify him with certainty. Sandusky will be asking the jury to believe that he is identifying the correct victim. Why should the jury believe him?
 
Last edited:
#196
#196
pl3 said:
You contradicted your entire argument about speculation, good people, innocent, et al bs in one statement. If nothing is wrong with it, why do you need to be there to watch to make sure nothing happened?
Click to expand...

I have stated that I am not a good person; do I think it is right to make assertions based/act on speculation? No. Does that mean I always do the right thing? No.
 
Last edited:
#200
#200
therealUT said:
I have stated that I am not a good person; do I think it is right to speculate? No. Does that mean I always do the right thing? No.
Click to expand...

Speculation or no, you have stated repeatedly that a young boy showering with a middle-aged man is not wrong. What would there be to speculate about that would lead you to want to monitor the situation?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top