BigOrangePhoenix
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2023
- Messages
- 177
- Likes
- 299
This is just my prediction and opinion (so not saying anyone else's opinion is incorrect or wrong) - I could see Stoops going back to KY for one year and then taking over at Iowa. I think Kirk Ferentz gets one more year and gets to 200+ wins with Iowa (not career wins). Iowa may not be a premier job but its his alma mater could be a good fit.100%, but Schiano isnt Stoops. I think Stoops would have killed it at A&M. Hes really limited to the basketball resources at Kentucky.
Unless Pruitt turned a blind eye to pedophelia, we definitely avoided the worser individual.
This is just my prediction and opinion (so not saying anyone else's opinion is incorrect or wrong) - I could see Stoops going back to KY for one year and then taking over at Iowa. I think Kirk Ferentz gets one more year and gets to 200+ wins with Iowa (not career wins). Iowa may not be a premier job but its his alma mater could be a good fit.
Oddly enough, they were all silent when OSU didn’t hire him as HC a few years ago. I never figured out why not, if he was the man and coach they said he was when UT didn’t hire him.I’m sure Herbie and all the other OSU fanboy media types that chastised and lectured us for Schiano Sunday, and talked about how good of a coach he was will push really hard for OSU to hire him as the next coach if Day gets fired sometime the next year or two because he can’t beat Michigan. (Blue font)
Probably well enough to last more than 3 years but would he have had a #1 CFP team in year 5? He would have done well enough to last 6 or 7 years before getting canned for underachieving.Honestly he would have likely done better than Pruitt
I bet they at least double what he was making at Duke, which was 3.5. Wouldn't be surprised if it isn't 8. Way too much for way too little proven on the field at the HC position. People act like he brought Duke up from nothing. Cutcliffe did, even though it tailed off at the end production wise (but not talent wise IMO).Doubt Elko is getting a mega-contract. Prolly start him at $5 mil per with a make-good boilerplate. Less than what it would’ve taken to compensate Stoops AND foot his buyout.
Who at least recruited most of the talent that made 2022 possible. Schiano wouldn’t have even given us that IMO
2020 | Rutgers | 3–6 | 3–6 | 5th (East) |
2021 | Rutgers | 5–8 | 2–7 | 6th (East) |
2022 | Rutgers | 4–8 | 1–8 | 7th (East) |
2023 | Rutgers | 6–6 | 3–6 | 5th (East) |
Took a 3 win team and won 9…that’s RESULTS not overhype.I bet they at least double what he was making at Duke, which was 3.5. Wouldn't be surprised if it isn't 8. Way too much for way too little proven on the field at the HC position. People act like he brought Duke up from nothing. Cutcliffe did, even though it tailed off at the end production wise (but not talent wise IMO).
Schiano would’ve done a better job than Pruitt and we wouldn’t have had the McDonald bags fiasco.