luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 46,731
- Likes
- 19,759
Let me help you out. Go back and reread....focus on the bolded below.
"I'm more concerned with the would be criminals who are discouraged by the illegality."
Get some rest.
That's absurd.Would be criminals that are discouraged by illegality are law abiding citizens. There’s no law that keeps people on the fence that would otherwise be a criminal. That’s completely absurd.
That's absurd.
Laws impact my behavior daily.
I live right off of a newly widened 4-6 lane road. The speed limit is 45 and constantly monitored by LEOs. I never drive over 54 on the road even though I know I could easily and safely drive 60 to 65.
........and I'm thankful for the speed limit every time my son is leaving or coming home.
We’ve played your silly ass game for too long. Now play ours. Which parts of NFA1934 are you open to repealing? I see no need for title II registration for silencers, short barreled rifles, or sawed off shot guns. So which of those are you in favor of removing title II status on?Does that stop you from coming up with your own definition?
No need to doubt why gun n*** are considered unreasonable and irrational.
Silencers need to be removed from the list.We’ve played your silly ass game for too long. Now play ours. Which parts of NFA1934 are you open to repealing? I see no need for title II registration for silencers, short barreled rifles, or sawed off shot guns. So which of those are you in favor of removing title II status on?
An antique is already defined as anything produced prior to 1898. The problem with guns "50 years or older" is that there are scary ones with detachable magazines and bayonet lugs and they hold more than three rounds. Surely we can't be allowing these maniac collectors to amass more than one of these weapons of war a month?I'm open for compromise. I'll start....50 years or older.