Senators set to vote on bill to codify Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage protections

[LouderVol]

Is that a mischaracterization of somebody else’s argument that seeks to marginalize or demonize those who disagree with the speaker?

If so, yes. If not, no. I’ll let you decide.

Not marganializing at all. Just pointing out how your broad brush applies to the other side.

I'd you dont like it, dont apply the technique.

 

[RockyTop85]

Not marganializing at all. Just pointing out how your broad brush applies to the other side.

I'd you dont like it, dont apply the technique.

Not marginalizing? Okay, sounds like they are not the same type of fallacy, then.

I was discussing specific instances of people using a certain type of fallacy, that’s the not even remotely close to a “broad brush.”

What part of “I’m not particularly in favor of a constitutional right to abortion,” made you think a post complaining about it being presented as woman’s rights issue would even apply to me?

You just managed three strikes on one pitch that nobody even threw. This may be one of the most spectacular fail posts in VolNation history. It should have been aborted.