Yes, statistical bias is everywhere and that's why an opinion based on those bias stats cannot be presented as irrefutable fact. Etienne wasn't that much better than Garner when you adjust for length of career, but he was better statistically speaking, so your last sentence is fair. But that doesn't mean that if you dropped Etienne in that UT offense he would have out-performed Garner. That is my whole point. Because we;ll never know neither you, nor I, nor anyone else can say one player was absolutely better than anyone else a university ever had.
Btw, I called him your hero because you chose to irrationally marry your arugment him. I don't believe he's your hero, but making light of you in that fashion was more polite than just calling you out for being dense and obtuse. I wouldn't have wasted my time typing if your original posts had just stated Etienne was statistically better.
