AirVol
Let’s go Brandon
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 23,672
- Likes
- 35,254
None of the things you mentioned are related to Seth Rich. Russia did not hack dnc servers. Seth Rich according to multiple sources, gave that information to Wikileaks.g
This is far more believeable than "everyone is a Russian agent based on absolutely 0 evidence"
None of the things you mentioned are related to Seth Rich. Russia did not hack dnc servers. Seth Rich according to multiple sources, gave that information to Wikileaks.
This is far more believeable than "everyone is a Russian agent based on absolutely 0 evidence"
That's what I thought. This is just like Pizzagate where there are no sources. This is entirely based on conjecture, amateur sleuthing and a connecting of the dots. A focus on alleged coincidences where a lack of evidence is considered evidence by itself. When one aspect of the story is discredited; the focus shifts to something else. This is a classic example of a conspiracy theory of the far right. Just take note that only the far right cares about this. Does anyone here honestly believe this gains any traction where it matters? If so, you are delusional.
Multiple Fox News employees told CNN that Hannity, who declined to comment, and others were hurting the credibility of the outlet by continuing to advance the theory, for which there is no real evidence.
"It is disappointing because it drags the rest of us down," said a senior Fox News employee, who asked how Fox News leadership could continue to allow Hannity to spread an unproven theory on the network.
Another Fox News employee said he feels that Hannity isn't letting go of the Rich story because he wants to "distract from any and all Trump scandals."
"It hurts those of us who are legitimately focused on journalism," added the first employee. "We have a chance to turn the corner at Fox, and perpetuating this conspiracy theory damages our integrity."
Another Fox News contributor, National Review columnist Jonah Goldberg, also appeared upset with Hannity Monday. He tweeted a link to a critical Washington Post piece about the Fox News host, later adding, "Shaming Hannity is my intention."
The Daily Beast additionally reported on Monday that Fox News staffers were "embarrassed" by Hannity's promotion of the conspiracy theory.
Brad Bauman, spokesman for the Rich family, told CNN last week that "anyone who continues to push this fake news story after it was so thoroughly debunked is proving to the world they have a transparent political agenda or are a sociopath."
Fox staffers are getting upset that Hannity and others are touting this nonsense.
http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/22/med...dex.html?iid=ob_homepage_deskrecommended_pool
"Multiple Fox News employees told CNN that Hannity, who declined to comment, and others were hurting the credibility of the outlet by continuing to advance the theory, for which there is no real evidence. "
That statement right there makes me question the validity
"Multiple Fox News employees told CNN that Hannity, who declined to comment, and others were hurting the credibility of the outlet by continuing to advance the theory, for which there is no real evidence. "
That statement right there makes me question the validity
"Multiple Fox News employees told CNN that Hannity, who declined to comment, and others were hurting the credibility of the outlet by continuing to advance the theory, for which there is no real evidence. "
That statement right there makes me question the validity