Cathartic or an opportunity to view a lot of pure BS?
I'm sure soldiers would appreciate your exploitation of their efforts.
How scummy. Color me surprised.
I'll reserve my praise for those who actually deserve it. That would include soldiers.
I am a veteran of military service, what are you, pond scum?
They're fighting Moslems of course they say merry Christmas
The first commanding general in Afghanistan was relieved of duty for making a disparaging remark about islam, the day of political correctness has arrived.
Duh.
GSVol: Have you addressed the Christian Zealot in Norway? For you to only put such emphasis on one religion is irresponsible and bigoted. You do realize you are pushing your religion on others do you not? Muslims have the same right as you do to practice and preach the religion they live by. You give a bad name to those Christians (like myself) that are tolerable just as the fundamentalist give the the rest of Islam a black eye.
The man in Norway was not involved with any Christian organization.
I'm not pushing my own religion at all, I am pointing out the agenda of another religion which is very political in essence.
I have no problem with anyone else to practice their religion as they see fit as long as it does not oppress others or infringe upon my own rights.
Since you claim to be a Christian, do you have any comment at all on what has and is being done to Christians by the ummah across the rest of the world?
Using this argument, those abortion clinic bombers, Irish combatants, KKK and Hutaree members sure are a great cross-section of the Christian population of the world. They don't represent me or anyone within my Christian faith that I know, but because we can mound all Islamic folks together it should be ok.
Lumping people together is dumb.
Nevertheless, it behooves us to compare notes.
THE ASTUTE BLOGGERS: ISLAM: THE RELIGION OF GENOCIDE
You almost got this one right. I remember sitting in a meeting where President Karzai discussed this case. On the one hand he had village elders who wanted him stoned and on the other hand he knew that doing so would reinforce the image they were a backwards country and intolerant to Christians. His solution was to have him declared insane by the court. The man was good with this as he liked to say he was crazy for Jesus, the village elders accepted it stating you would have to be crazy to leave Islam knowing it would result in death and we were able to accept it as a political solution to a sticky problem.
Well if everyone who wanted to leave islam were afforded the same deal, then I wouldn't be so adverse to that solution but that isn't the case now is it?
Now let's take that one step further, what if the man wanted to build a church in Afghanistan, would that be all right or would it be burned down by a bunch of bassackward intolerant moslems?
The Afghan Constitution is actually pretty moderate by Islamic standards. They included the rights of women, recognized 27 different cultures as integral to the Afghan nation and ensured religious tolerance. Other religions such as Christianity, Bahia and Zoroastrianism are allowed--bottom line is though the Pashtuns are the largest group, the Tajiks, Uzbeks and so forth practice their own religion and cultural practices and they made sure it was allowed in the constitution.
Moderate by islamic standards??
Color me very impressed by their tolerance.
I know our people have built close to a hundred Mosques in Afghanistan, just how many churches have we built since you are in the know?
Maybe you can explain why we burned hundreds if not thousands of Bibles printed in Pasto and Urdu to appease the moslems?
While the constitution says that they can make no law that goes against Islam, and it declared Afghanistan to be an Islamic State, it did not make Sharia the law of the land. Instead it recognizes that local law often is the most important for the people.
Wow, again I'm impressed.
I probably understand tribal law, which predates the islamic invasion by centuries better than you since one of my ancestors carried the predominiate name in the region, Khyber.
BTW, the tribal law could be traced back to the original Jewish law and it is possible that one of the ten banished tribes of Israel settled in the region, wouldn't it be interesting to do some DNA testing?
Interestingly when I talked to Afghans about democracy they would say ours was pretty young considering they had a form of representational democracy for over 5000 years. They would point to their jirga system where the village would elect a rep to go to the regional jirga where they would decide who would attend the national jirgas. Seemed familiar to me.
I would say they have had one of the best forms of governments that has ever existed, with the possible exception of that of Bhutan but that isn't the thrust of the current push for world government and one of the main components of that push is to wipe out or destroy all 'tribalism' and the jirga is tribal until it can be turned into a democratic parliament.
Color me stupid if you don't think I understand what is actually going on, Truman said if American's really knew what was going on, there would be open rebellion.
Anyway, like many have said, you can't put all Muslims in the same box. 400 million Indonesians don't think much like any Arab. Iranians can't stand Iraqis, of course the whole Suni, Shia thing comes into play, but the point is there is as wide variety in Islam as there is in Christianity, Judaism or Buddhism.
True, however there are some things that are the same everywhere with moslems and that is to eradicate non moslems, don't ever forget that factoid.
So who should we be worried about? The Salafist movement is the one you should look up and worry about.
They just won 21% of the first round voting in Egypt (the MB won 47% and aren't all that different), I do know that the Saudis are footing the bill for nearly a thousand imams in America to preach their vile, violent doctrine.
Back in 1965 I manned a desk next to probably the smartest man I ever knew, at least in the top five and I've had the priviledge of meeting and getting to know many very intelligent men.
He was fluent in Chinese and Russian and was about to go to Arabic language school, not that I havn't known others who spoke far more languages.
He tried to convince me that our main problem in the future would come from the Aribic speaking world and I was skeptical but what he said has come to pass, has it not?
When I first read 'Tragedy and Hope' in the '60s, I was skeptical of the assertion by Quigley that the three powers that would emerge would be America and it's allies, the socialists, mainly Russia and China and a coalition between the Arabic speaking world and the Spanish speaking world.
I thought that rather hard to believe, a thousand years, beginning with the moslem invasion of Iberia and then 300+ years of the inquisition to rid themselves of islam represented to me and unbreachable chasm, I was wrong, Quigley was right, do not current events prove him right.
I would suggest that anyone wanted to discuss politics first read 'tragedy and hope' then reread it again.
Do that and then call me names.