- Joined
- Oct 24, 2003
- Messages
- 115,448
- Likes
- 68,188
Who's waiting to pounce?(GAVol @ May 2 said:Obviously winning would be better than losing. :crazy: All I'm saying is that I don't think a loss would be the cataclysmic event that some people are making it out to be. Face it, a lot of people are waiting to pounce regardless of when the first loss occurs.
yeah, well that's to be expected...though i don't know that it would be too bad if we are 4-1 heading in to the UGA game.......the UF game is going to be weird this year...there will be a lot of people that think we should win....i'm one that for now, thinks that UF should beat us...it's a loss i've already budgeted. Cal is the toss up game in my mind for the 1st 5 weeks.(GAVol @ May 2 said:No one in particular, I'm just saying that if we lose any of the first 3 games people, the natives are going to get restless coming off the debacle last year.
nah.....losign to Cal would suck...but laughing stock? i mean, we do have to play the rest of our schedule...including at Ark....so if all that happens and we go in to fayetnam and beat the piggies......what then?(VolunteerHillbilly @ May 2 said:If we loose to Cal but Arkansas beats USC we will remain the laughingstock of CFB in general and the SEC in particular. It is a must win game for this program.
Not true. Cal is an absolute fraud. A loss to them will prove no improvement has been made. Cal=The '06 version of Iowa and Michigan from '05.(GAVol @ May 2 said:The fact is though, we could have a vastly improved team and still lose to Cal. That's why I'm not quite ready to go on a suicide watch if we lose the opener.
i do agree with that....you can tell if a team is any good or not by watching them play...even in a loss...kind of like ND against USC last year or OSU against TX.....no body walked away from those games saying OSU or ND sucked.(GAVol @ May 2 said:The fact is though, we could have a vastly improved team and still lose to Cal. That's why I'm not quite ready to go on a suicide watch if we lose the opener.
that may very well be true, but right now, know one knows.....(hatvol96 @ May 2 said:Not true. Cal is an absolute fraud. A loss to them will prove no improvement has been made. Cal=The '06 version of Iowa and Michigan from '05.
(hatvol96 @ May 2 said:Not true. Cal is an absolute fraud.
(jakez4ut @ May 2 said:i'm probably putting a lot on this game unjustly too....i don't think if we lose the game that we'll just come apart at the seams or anything, but i do think it will have an affect on the confidence and faith of the players in what the coaches are trying to do....
From that standpoint, if we come out and win with the so called "new" offense, i think it really gets the guys pumped up and believing again...
but from an overall picture, if we were to lose a game in the 1st half of the season, and i had a choice as to what it'd be...i'd choose the Cal game....it's early, non conference and we would still control our own destiny in the SEC E. From that stand point, the game doesn't matter.
But this year, for this staff and this team, they need to get a good win under their belt before the SEC schedule gets going....