cncchris33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2009
- Messages
- 34,130
- Likes
- 51,220
The trouble with that statement is this; one can argue that at 13-7, with our remaining schedule, we have a good shot to dance.
You are ready to tar and feather him over the difference in one win/loss before Feb. 1st when the end result could still be the same. That just doesn't seem logical to me, and I say that as someone who has publicly stated my lack of support for his future as our coach.
I guess here is where we differ.
At 13-7 our at large chances are lost IMO. I know you disagree but I just don't see enough quality wins the rest of the way to get there.
Beat 2 of the 4(kentucky, florida, Virginia, Lsu) and win all the rest and that puts us back into the at large talk IMO
The fact that this isn't the first time its one game that potenially spoils the year. He's out of one game passes IMO
WHAT?! So at 13-7, with 10 games remaining our at large chances are gone, wave the white flag? So go 9-1, finish 22-8 and we are headed to the NIT again? Ok, now I know you're simply just trolling.
So you're saying be 14-6, and win the rest and we MAY have a chance to GET BACK INTO THE TALK? We would be 24-6, we almost certainly would be ranked, where are you pulling this crap from Bruin?
I can see that as an emotional argument, but not as a logical one. The committee doesn't select the field based on emotion, which is where I think your entire argument is based, which isn't necessarily wrong because you are a fan.
So going 22-8, making the dance is no progress?
Gotcha.
BTOs approach to CCM reminds me of a kid imagining themselves playing in a big game.
Down 1 10 seconds left
He shoots
he misses!!!
Oh.......
But he was fouled!!
He shoots the free throw and misses
But there was a lane violation.....
He shoots again........
The problem is all these fantasy land ideas sooner or later come crashing down.
Of course you realize the point of this thread was assuming all of these things you keep repeating won't happen DID happen. Not to keep telling everyone they weren't going to happen and why.
Of course you realize the point of this thread was assuming all of these things you keep repeating won't happen DID happen. Not to keep telling everyone they weren't going to happen and why.
This thread like nearly other others has wondered from its original topic.
I certainly think CCM stays if he gets us to the sweet 16
BTOs approach to CCM reminds me of a kid imagining themselves playing in a big game.
Dooley was maybe the worst UT football coach in history.
Martin isn't even the worst basketball coach in the past 25 years; he's not even the second worse, and it's debatable he's even 3rd if we're going on record and results.
This thread like nearly other others has wondered from its original topic.
There's at least 3. Floridia, and Missouri twice. How many good wins does a team have to have for the NCAA committee to consider you?
He was comparing CCM to Dooley not football hires to basketball hires.
One of those "worse" coaches took a sub 500 club to the conference tournament final. Jury is still out on CCM's ranking in the worst BB coach in 25 years.
I did like what I saw last night, so I will have a wait and see approach from now on.
Huh? He's comparing him to the worst football coach they've ever had. That's insulting to Martin, because as I said, he's not even the worst coach of the past 25 years.
If you seriously think CCM is worse than Houston, then I can only assume you never actually watched a Houston team play. The ONLY reason they were .500 ever was because of his son. You recall his record after his son left?
CCM is also already done better than Peterson.
None of this is anything to really celebrate, but it's still a pretty silly comparison. This place is going way overboard in acting like these are the darkest times of basketball.