South Carolina will beat us at home,

#277
#277
BisonVol said:
I think SC is a slightly better team than us right now. They certainly have the better QB. With that being said, I think we beat them. Our guys are going to be extra motivated, we’re playing under the lights, dark mode will be making an appearance… the Neyland Effect along with our guys playing extra motivated will be enough to get the job done in a close one.
Click to expand...
We were much better than SC last year and we all saw how that worked out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chambers1517
#279
#279
Manning4ever said:
I agree with everything you just said. I believe we beat the gamecocks. My point was if we don't. I like coach Heupel. Say we lose. Maybe come in 4th in the sec east. Should we discuss changing coaching
Click to expand...
Hell no. Why? What coach worth a damn would come here after firing a guy that finished in the top ten the year before ? Our last real contender was 2001 until Josh arrived. With the new playoff format on the horizon, why change? Heupel is a good coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen, lutra and GordonC
#284
#284
Manning4ever said:
You believe I am manic depressive for asking a qualified question
Click to expand...
No bc you acted offended when I pointed out that CJH won 11 games and ended a year ago ranked in the top ten. Then a few minutes later you said I didn't answer your question. You make no sense. So just to be clear, there is no record that ends with CJH on the hot seat. You would be a moron to think so. No follow up by you needed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13, McDad, lutra and 1 other person
#286
#286
Rattler versus our secondary (or lack of a secondary I should say) will equal big chuck plays for USC.

Banks will attempt to make them put together long drives with his “bend but don’t break” defense. Not sue if it will work or not.

If UT wins the turnover battle plus 2 and playing at home . . . UT should win.

But that’s the only way they win.

Rattler will carve up our secondary.
 
#287
#287
BisonVol said:
True. Home field advantage under the lights can make all the difference in the world. Granted, we had some locker room drama that also came into play, but the point stands.
Click to expand...
I was under the impression from many posters here that we have terrible fans who are the cause of each and every loss. How do we have a home field advantage if that’s remotely true?
 
#288
#288
P
volfanhill said:
No bc you acted offended when I pointed out that CJH won 11 games and ended a year ago ranked in the top ten. Then a few minutes later you said I didn't answer your question. You make no sense. So just to be clear, there is no record that ends with CJH on the hot seat. You would be a moron to think so. No follow up by
Click to expand...
 
#289
#289
Go47 said:
Rattler versus our secondary (or lack of a secondary I should say) will equal big chuck plays for USC.

Banks will attempt to make them put together long drives with his “bend but don’t break” defense. Not sue if it will work or not.

If UT wins the turnover battle plus 2 and playing at home . . . UT should win.

But that’s the only way they win.

Rattler will carve up our secondary.
Click to expand...
Wouldn’t we be better served putting tons of pressure on Rattler given the state of their line vs ours?
 
#291
#291
Not so fast ......
Neyland will play a huge role.
Sampson will run wild.
Beasley will shut down their qb and running game.
 
#293
#293
PEPPERJAX said:
Hell no. Why? What coach worth a damn would come here after firing a guy that finished in the top ten the year before ? Our last real contender was 2001 until Josh arrived. With the new playoff format on the horizon, why change? Heupel is a good coach.
Click to expand...
He is a good coach. Hope he stays, and wins
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top