Space Exploration

Are NASA's future missions and budget justified?

  • It's worth the time and expenditures

    Votes: 222 65.9%
  • Complete waste of money

    Votes: 41 12.2%
  • We need to explore, but not at the current cost

    Votes: 74 22.0%

  • Total voters
    337
For one of the few times in my life I think I will not have the least bit of trouble getting out of bed early on a Sunday
 
For one of the few times in my life I think I will not have the least bit of trouble getting out of bed early on a Sunday
What do you mean??

I heard today that after the election that NASA will make public that they found life through James Webb Telescope. On that water planet that’s like 147 LYs away.
 
I've been seeing they planned to catch this with these arms.
I've missed the reasoning of it compared to landing it with feet on a pad. Anybody that can fill me in?
You’ll often hear Musk talk about the need for it to be “fully and rapidly reusable,” “rapidly” being the key word. They envision using a booster multiple times in a single day. Hence, the desire to not just land, but land on the launch pad so it can be refueled and launched again a few hours later.
 
I've been seeing they planned to catch this with these arms.
I've missed the reasoning of it compared to landing it with feet on a pad. Anybody that can fill me in?

Weight savings is a huge reason. Landing gear is heavy and the weight they save on the first stage pays off like five fold or more in the upper stage.

Catching with the arms keeps the weight down and makes reusability easier.
 

VN Store



Back
Top