State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America

#301
#301
allvol123 said:
Are you ok with anyone going in and out of your house, even if you have not ackowledged them?
Click to expand...
No. However, if someone can sneak in and out of my house, without me seeing them, and without taking any of my possessions, then the more power to them.
 
#303
#303
Since I answered you absolutely ridiculous question (which I guess by asking completely ridiculous questions is the only way you can make your point,) are you going to answer my very basic and pragmatic question of what you feel endangered by that is crossing the border?
 
#304
#304
therealUT said:
Since I answered you absolutely ridiculous question (which I guess by asking completely ridiculous questions is the only way you can make your point,) are you going to answer my very basic and pragmatic question of what you feel endangered by that is crossing the border?
Click to expand...

you answered it with a no. which is the answer to my thinking we should have an open border. You call it ridiculous because it made you give a ridiculous answer, after the NO of course. your usual method, question is ridiculous if you don't like the answer you supplied.
 
#305
#305
therealUT said:
Since I answered you absolutely ridiculous question (which I guess by asking completely ridiculous questions is the only way you can make your point,) are you going to answer my very basic and pragmatic question of what you feel endangered by that is crossing the border?
Click to expand...

I feel endangered by somone entering my house that I have not given permission to enter my house.
 
#306
#306
So how far are you willing to go with screening those unknowns? Are you going to wall up your town and screen all of those newcomers? After all we aren't sure who those are....child molesters, drug addicts, drug dealers, murderers, thieves, bums, etc.
 
#308
#308
allvol123 said:
you answered it with a no. which is the answer to my thinking we should have an open border. You call it ridiculous because it made you give a ridiculous answer, after the NO of course. your usual method, question is ridiculous if you don't like the answer you supplied.
Click to expand...
I call it ridiculous because it is a ridiculous question that has absolutely no bearing on the situation. Illegal immigrants are not just "coming into your house." They are coming into America, which is a sovereign republic, based upon the democratic ideals of individual freedom and capitalism. There is an accepted charter that states the ideas and which, as a citizen of America, you should probably buy into. That charter is the Constitution. I can choose to let people in my own house or not, because I do not claim my house to be a bastion of democracy. I run my house as a dictatorship. I am the head of my household. With that being said, if someone was able to enter my house undetected at all times, refrain from stealing my property or harassing myself or my family, then I would have no problem with it.

I have a huge problem with you and others like you, which there are plenty of. You buy into a party line and you spout it out as far as you can. At the moment you run out of borrowed ideas to regurgitate, you either began spewing nothing but oral diarrhea and state absolutely ridiculous hypotheticals or you flee the argument. Neither of which is very honorable.

This is the part where you accuse me of not being able to handle an argument without getting angry. Except, this time, I am going to tell you that I have every right to be angry. Once you leave the realm of logical thought with your irrational hypotheticals, you permit me to enter the realm of rage where I tell you exactly where you can stick your bovine scatology.

Thanks for playing.
 
#309
#309
Just don't turn your dictatorship of a house into a cult compound....Attorneys General frown upon such things.
 
#310
#310
therealUT said:
I call it ridiculous because it is a ridiculous question that has absolutely no bearing on the situation. Illegal immigrants are not just "coming into your house." They are coming into America, which is a sovereign republic, based upon the democratic ideals of individual freedom and capitalism. There is an accepted charter that states the ideas and which, as a citizen of America, you should probably buy into. That charter is the Constitution. I can choose to let people in my own house or not, because I do not claim my house to be a bastion of democracy. I run my house as a dictatorship. I am the head of my household. With that being said, if someone was able to enter my house undetected at all times, refrain from stealing my property or harassing myself or my family, then I would have no problem with it.

I have a huge problem with you and others like you, which there are plenty of. You buy into a party line and you spout it out as far as you can. At the moment you run out of borrowed ideas to regurgitate, you either began spewing nothing but oral diarrhea and state absolutely ridiculous hypotheticals or you flee the argument. Neither of which is very honorable.

This is the part where you accuse me of not being able to handle an argument without getting angry. Except, this time, I am going to tell you that I have every right to be angry. Once you leave the realm of logical thought with your irrational hypotheticals, you permit me to enter the realm of rage where I tell you exactly where you can stick your bovine scatology.

Thanks for playing.
Click to expand...

Your earlier answer of NO was sufficient.
 
#311
#311
CSpindizzy said:
So how far are you willing to go with screening those unknowns? Are you going to wall up your town and screen all of those newcomers? After all we aren't sure who those are....child molesters, drug addicts, drug dealers, murderers, thieves, bums, etc.
Click to expand...

I no that no plan at all is not far enough.
 
#316
#316
allvol123 said:
He was the one asking for a direct answer.
Click to expand...
It was direct. It was NO. Your question included something in there about me not acknowledging this said person. Therefore, I clarified you question. The only way I would not acknowledge them is if I did not encounter them.
 
#317
#317
therealUT said:
It was direct. It was NO. Your question included something in there about me not acknowledging this said person. Therefore, I clarified you question. The only way I would not acknowledge them is if I did not encounter them.
Click to expand...

If they don't steal, harass, blah blah, lot of if's for a direct answer.
 
#319
#319
allvol123 said:
If they don't steal, harass, blah blah, lot of if's for a direct answer.
Click to expand...

That applies to everyone not just illegals. Frankly, I don't go around checking papers like your usual police states. So if that person over there leaves me be I don't care. if he's productive so be it. If he's minding his own business, so be it. If he's illegal, I can't check and it's not my place to.
 
#323
#323
CSpindizzy said:
That applies to everyone not just illegals. Frankly, I don't go around checking papers like your usual police states. So if that person over there leaves me be I don't care. if he's productive so be it. If he's minding his own business, so be it. If he's illegal, I can't check and it's not my place to.
Click to expand...

Agreed, leave me be and stop entering the country illegally.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top