While Tennessee is not a baseball juggernaut, we have fielded some great teams and players. With our resources and fan base, there is no reason why we cannot field a competitive team each and every year. We should be able to win some SEC championship and obtain NCAA tournament births.
However, after reading this article I feel like there is a lot that can be improved on for Tennessee baseball. The gist of the article is discussing the revenue and profits of SEC baseball teams. We paid our head coach $679,000 (With bonuses and benefits). It shows our baseball program at a $4+ million deficit. Plus when you look at the facilities throughout the SEC, I think we can improve Lindsey Nelson.
Here's the article: http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/sports/lsu/article_5edd22c0-465c-11e7-8b99-c709d5eb08c1.html
Its a sh!t stadium, in a sh!t location with sh!tty parking.
Here's a couple of sun belt stadiums... ECU and CCU to be exact
View attachment 132075
View attachment 132076
As I understand it some schools have easier standards for academic scholarships. It's hard to get one at Tennessee.
You honestly think UVA and Vandy have "easier" qualifications for academic aid than UT does? I asked this question last week in another thread and it got overlooked, what prevents us from doing it? It sounds more and more like we CHOOSE not to implement this option rather than Vandy has found some loophole. Every school has to abide by and answer to the NCAA rule book so it's not some built in advantage that only a select few schools are privy to; perhaps only a select few schools freely CHOOSE to spend their dollars in this arena to promote a certain sport. Vandy and UVA know it's gonna be a lot harder trying to find 85 baby geniuses who also happen to be great football players and sell them on coming there, than it is to find 15-20 baseball players who meet both criteria so they pour their resources into baseball instead.
As I understand it some schools have easier standards for academic scholarships. It's hard to get one at Tennessee.
That's just BS. UT has academic scholarship money available to students who qualify for them. That's just fact. There are standards at all schools. Non-revenue sports (sports other than football and basketball where athletic schollys are full rides and not partials) athletes have the same qualification standards as does every other student.
The whining about lack of scholarship money is just an excuse. Period.
And on page 5 .....
Tennessee Tech 3
Florida State 1
Some really good baseball is being played in Tennessee - just not by the team coached by the dude making 675,000
that an insane amount to pay -- 6 consecutive years of awful baseball and awful recruiting ...Ugggg
That's just BS. UT has academic scholarship money available to students who qualify for them. That's just fact. There are standards at all schools. Non-revenue sports (sports other than football and basketball where athletic schollys are full rides and not partials) athletes have the same qualification standards as does every other student.
The whining about lack of scholarship money is just an excuse. Period.
Your wrong bud. Serrano has said it, Jon Wilkerson has said it, many have said it. There is not an equal playing ground out there.
Dude settle down. You aren't reading the fine print my friend. Yes all schools have standards BUT all schools don't have the same standards to get academic scholarships. Some SEC schools can get in state tuition for out of state students with certain grades. If one school gives scholarships for a 3.0 while it takes a 3.5 at another that's a big difference. Call it making excuses all you want but it's true.
How are the other SEC schools doing it then? Arkansas's entire starting lineup is practically comprised of out of state kids, LSU has a ton of kids from out of state, once Cohen came back to Miss State they set up shop in metro-Birmingham (he's from Tuscaloosa) and picked the best kids out of central and north AL. Outside of UF and aTm, a lot of schools are winning big without homegrown talent. I can't imagine they're all wealthy or taking out massive student loans because they're on a 0.85 scholarship.
Not to get into the middle of your argument, but I read the other day, and I will have to double check...either or both Arkansas and/or MSU are allowed to waive out of state tuition...to be honest I'm just now starting to try to wrap my head around why a school like that can do it, but we can't...I'm not saying it's a fact that I know, but it is something I'm interested in understanding better.
Once again it's a school option then? And FTR, I'm not trying to argue. I don't doubt fellow SEC schools have advantages over us, it just appears it's self inflicted on our part rather than a private vs public or large endowment vs small endowment issue. It just seems to go back to the bureaucrats on the Hill not understanding the financial windfalls that come for the university as a whole, from successful athletic programs. Whether they like it or not, athletics play an integral role in the collegiate experience for regular students.
My college choice came down to 2 schools; UT, the school I grew up rooting for 850 miles away or my dad's alma mater, a small private school 2.5 hrs from home (with no football) and a major that no other school in the country offered. Sad as it may be, the decision came down to the fact that I couldn't imagine not having a football game to go to every Saturday for the next 4 years. So I ultimately chose UT and passed up being a 3rd generation alumni.
Bowlinggreenvol,
I have said a few times on here I have a cousin that is in NCAA compliance at a school not named Tennessee and he explained all this a few years back to me. If anyone has followed my post over the years I used to post that Vandy was cheating. I since found out there aren't. I didn't believe all students got the same need based money as baseball players but I now believe that. So here is what he said to me to make me best understand it.
Schools set their acedemic scholarships and or out of state tuition waivers to help boost enrollment of certain kinds of students from certain places. If a school wants to grow that makes it easier for students to attend but in Tennessees case growth isn't wanted so making it tougher to get into school and pay for it is something I think has been a plan and it has worked as the university as a hole is very healthy.
On the need based aid front which is different than another poster wants to admit some schools with massive endowments believe their money will come back to them in donations if they invest in their "needy" students. So if the family income says a Vandy student can only pay 5k of the 60k yearly cost that is all they pay and in turn they believe their graduates will that them with donations.
Could Tennesse do all this? Sure but with a healthy university we really shouldn't.
Well it's working for Vandy since their endowment is 3x UT's despite having an enrollment (and thus alumni base) that's 1/4 of UT's. I attended WKU for graduate school and they implemented the out of state waiver for certain areas of the country to grow the student body from a regional basis to more national. Kids from these qualifying areas pay in state tuition + 25%, which is still significantly less than OOS. It started with the metro Nashville area close to Bowling Green and has since expanded to include major metro areas across the South and lower Midwest. They use this to their advantage specifically in baseball. In addition to pulling kids from middle TN, they pull a respectable number out of metro STL, Tampa and Chicago. It's an option that applies to all students, as my wife received this tuition rate coming from Nashville. I can see a school like Miss State offering that because the state population is so small to begin with and it's a small town in a part of the country that just doesn't attract many kids outside of MS.
We could but in the best interest of the school we don't need to.
Does that make sense?
lol, I apologized in advance, just a reminder...if we start with what is best for Football, Basketball and Baseball, and the women's equivalence of those sports...can't we come to a middle ground, or is that not possible...
Let me try it a different way, as it pertains to partials...what makes us less competitive, just on scholly's than UK, UGA, MSU, Arky, Ole Miss?
Georgias hope gets full Tuition so they shouldn't ever leave the state. Arkansas gets in state in Texas I think so that is huge. Tennessee should win at the same kind of clip as Kentucky IMO. You can't set scholarships with any sports in mind only with the vision of the student body imo.