bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 74,146
- Likes
- 50,402
There's some real hate for Scotty in this thread. Scotty was one of the most frustrating kids to ever play here I know. He used to drive me nuts too. However, those of you acting like this kid couldn't play and was a complete bust are mistaken. He was absolutely unstoppable at times during his jr year. The Pitt game and Vandy at home come to mind. He played like a lottery pick for stretches. Y'all need to quit bashing the kid.
The ONLY thing that kept him out of the nba was his handle. Him supposedly having a bad interview had zero to do with him not getting drafted. There are certified loons in the nba with lower ceilings than Hopson.
Personally, I hope he improves his handle and makes a roster.
You are arguing with yourself.....no one has stated he was ready for the nba
You need to make up your mind what you're arguing. I'm not arguing whether Hopson underachieved or not. I'm arguing that he was/is a better player than Higgins (which I can't believe is even an argument). You keep harping on the fact that Hopson left too early, he underachieved, he plays in a lousy foreign league, there are umpteen number of recent Tennessee players better than him, etc. In the same breath, you claim to have no personal beef with Hopson, yet you don't miss a chance to run over the guy.
I'll say it again, and its the last time I'll say it. No NBA scout/exec/coach would agree with your belief that John Higgins is a better, more talented player than Scotty Hopson.
We'll just have to agree to disagree.[/QUOT
I'm not running over Hopson. I'm being realistic when I tell you Hopson isn't NBA material like some of you think he could be. It's more then just his handles. His mental approach is going to be questioned, and he's a below avg defender. Thats FACTS. It's not bashing the kid.
You need to make up your mind what you're arguing. I'm not arguing whether Hopson underachieved or not. I'm arguing that he was/is a better player than Higgins (which I can't believe is even an argument). You keep harping on the fact that Hopson left too early, he underachieved, he plays in a lousy foreign league, there are umpteen number of recent Tennessee players better than him, etc. In the same breath, you claim to have no personal beef with Hopson, yet you don't miss a chance to run over the guy.
I'll say it again, and its the last time I'll say it. No NBA scout/exec/coach would agree with your belief that John Higgins is a better, more talented player than Scotty Hopson.
We'll just have to agree to disagree.[/QUOT
I'm not running over Hopson. I'm being realistic when I tell you Hopson isn't NBA material like some of you think he could be. It's more then just his handles. His mental approach is going to be questioned, and he's a below avg defender. Thats FACTS. It's not bashing the kid.
I really wish you'd pick one argument and go with it.
You'll get a lot more respect without the wild generalizations about a group of people in this forum by saying we all have a man-crush on Hopson, or we think he's NBA all-pro material, or God's gift to basketball.
When confronted with information that conflicts your opinion, you just ignore it and move on to another semi-related tangent. You then throw out insult after insult (either intentionally or otherwise) to drive home your opinion.
You think Hopson is an overrated hack who doesn't belong in the best Euro-leagues, let alone the NBA. All he does is score. He was very inconsequential to his teams' success. He doesn't play defense. He can't dribble. Yada, yada, yada. We get it.
Well you guys sure are touchy when I say he's overhyped and will never play in the NBA. A lot of you sure make it seam that you think he'll make the NBA one day and most of you think was a great player here at UT. He was good nothing more and nothing less.
I really wish you'd pick one argument and go with it.
You'll get a lot more respect without the wild generalizations about a group of people in this forum by saying we all have a man-crush on Hopson, or we think he's NBA all-pro material, or God's gift to basketball.
When confronted with information that conflicts your opinion, you just ignore it and move on to another semi-related tangent. You then throw out insult after insult (either intentionally or otherwise) to drive home your opinion.
You think Hopson is an overrated hack who doesn't belong in the best Euro-leagues, let alone the NBA. All he does is score. He was very inconsequential to his teams' success. He doesn't play defense. He can't dribble. Yada, yada, yada. We get it.
Actually I've answered ever argument to mine which is why this BS went on for 3 pages now. I'm not looking for respect over a friggin message. We are going to disagree on this subject no matter no matter what.
Actually I've answered ever argument to mine which is why this BS went on for 3 pages now. I'm not looking for respect over a friggin message. We are going to disagree on this subject no matter no matter what.
You're right on your last sentence. We won't agree on this issue. I stated as much in my last two posts. You believe Jon Higgins was a better player than Scotty Hopson. That alone tells me I can't rationally discuss this topic with you.
As for respect, I'm talking in a general discussion format where respect is earned/given for treating each other like adults. It doesn't surprise me that you aren't looking for it, as you don't give it either. You try to railroad conversations by belittling people's opinions when they don't align with what you view as popular opinion (aka: your opinion), and making wide-ranging generalizations that stray to the far extremes, despite little to no proof to support them.
This will be my last post on the subject. Good day.
Scotty definitely has the talent to make an NBA roster, you don't score multiple 30+ games your junior year and somehow become a 'bust', if he stayed his senior year under Cuonzo he would have been on fire with the right mentality.
Jackson is coming back, he and Crawford are just being evaluated by the NBA draft committee.
Sounds incredibly untrue but I thought I would see if anyone had heard anything more than I, a guy in my English class got a text from a friend this morning saying this.
You're right on your last sentence. We won't agree on this issue. I stated as much in my last two posts. You believe Jon Higgins was a better player than Scotty Hopson. That alone tells me I can't rationally discuss this topic with you.
As for respect, I'm talking in a general discussion format where respect is earned/given for treating each other like adults. It doesn't surprise me that you aren't looking for it, as you don't give it either. You try to railroad conversations by belittling people's opinions when they don't align with what you view as popular opinion (aka: your opinion), and making wide-ranging generalizations that stray to the far extremes, despite little to no proof to support them.
This will be my last post on the subject. Good day.
I gave you stats of Higgins, "those far extremes", that proved his worth. You don't accept statically records apparently so it seams you'd be the one making generalizations based on zero fact. Good day.
Stokes is listed as "on the fence". Projected to go mid second round to undrafted.
2013 Early Entry List | NBADraft.net
You're right on your last sentence. We won't agree on this issue. I stated as much in my last two posts. You believe Jon Higgins was a better player than Scotty Hopson. That alone tells me I can't rationally discuss this topic with you.
As for respect, I'm talking in a general discussion format where respect is earned/given for treating each other like adults. It doesn't surprise me that you aren't looking for it, as you don't give it either. You try to railroad conversations by belittling people's opinions when they don't align with what you view as popular opinion (aka: your opinion), and making wide-ranging generalizations that stray to the far extremes, despite little to no proof to support them.
This will be my last post on the subject. Good day.
Also here's you some stats:
Hopson Sophomore year:
SEC Tourney:
Game 1: 2 pts
Game 2: 6 pts
Game 3: 11 pts
avg: 6.3ppg
NCAA Tourney:
Game 1: 2 pts
Game 2: 17 pts
Game 3: 3 pts
Game 4: 10 pts
avg: 8 ppg
Junior year:
SEC Tourney:
Game 1: 8 pts
Game 2: 13.5 pts
avg: 13.5 PPG
NCAA Tourney:
Game 1: 4 pts
avg: 4 pts
Big time games Hopson does not show up usually. SEC tourney and NCAA tourney are what matter most. Hopson was 3.5 Pts off his average in the SEC tourney and didn't show up in the NCAA tourney his Junior year. His Sophomore season he had two good games in the NCAA tourney, but the last game where he scored 10 pts he also missed a crucial FT and shot 50% from the line that game going 3-6. Biggest game in UT basketball history and Hopson scored 10 pts.
Also here's you some stats:
Hopson Sophomore year:
SEC Tourney:
Game 1: 2 pts
Game 2: 6 pts
Game 3: 11 pts
avg: 6.3ppg
NCAA Tourney:
Game 1: 2 pts
Game 2: 17 pts
Game 3: 3 pts
Game 4: 10 pts
avg: 8 ppg
Junior year:
SEC Tourney:
Game 1: 8 pts
Game 2: 13.5 pts
avg: 13.5 PPG
NCAA Tourney:
Game 1: 4 pts
avg: 4 pts
Big time games Hopson does not show up usually. SEC tourney and NCAA tourney are what matter most. Hopson was 3.5 Pts off his average in the SEC tourney and didn't show up in the NCAA tourney his Junior year. His Sophomore season he had two good games in the NCAA tourney, but the last game where he scored 10 pts he also missed a crucial FT and shot 50% from the line that game going 3-6. Biggest game in UT basketball history and Hopson scored 10 pts.
He scored double digits in the do or die games. And, how can a player score .5 points in a game? From what it looks like, he was more valuable to the team when he wasn't the leading scorer. Much like McRae this year.
Edit: Do or die, meaning the last one, which makes it the biggest game. I know every game in a single elimination tourney is do or die.