The whole Stoops vs. the SEC discussion is not about the SEC's top tier teams and their National Championships they've accrued. It's about the lower tier SEC teams and the competition they pose for the upper tier; in other words, 2-3 tough contests then a waltz through a cupcake schedule of lower teams. With so much talk of playing a conference championship versus playing everyone in a given conference the Big XII is being picked on unjustly. The Big XII 's lower tier this year will include W. Virginia and Okie State and you saw how they played Bama and FSU. Texas is OU's rival so it's always tough, but this year with the change in coaches, they appear to be a lower tier team. What I find interesting is Stoops is calling out Kentucky, where his brother now coaches. Talk about sibling rivalry! I remember the great Tennessee teams and know that you're a bit down now that it appears you're a lower tier team for a few seasons. Stoops will take it back if any of the SEC's lower tier beats him but will feel he's proven the point if the Sooners win and more importantly win by the current spread (20.5) on Saturday's game. Again, if everyone stops talking about OU not deserving to play in the final 4because they don't play a conference championship game but instead look at the quality of the competition within the conference, this discussion would be over. Incidentally, when OU scheduled Tennessee some 10-15 years ago, you were looking very competitive. The last few years we've had FSU home and away (won both), Notre Dame (split), Oregon (split but had to deal with PAC XII refs) and even further back Bama (won both), as well as other high caliber teams. Stoops welcomes the challenge.
I understand where Stoops is coming from to a point.
However, personnally, I think he's full of it.
I agree the SEC has its Vandy's and Kentucky's. There's no question of that.
However, I hear a lot of people pointing to the success of A&M and Mizzou since joining the league, but no one has bothered to acknowledge that Arkansas went from a nationally relevant program into the crapper. They've appeared in 3 SEC title games and 1 BCS bowl since entering the SEC. They won 13 SWC titles in their history. They are below .500 in SEC conference games. In the 33 years prior to joining the SEC, they had 2 losing seasons. In the 22 years of being in the SEC, they've had 9 losing seasons.
And it's not what's at the top in the SEC, it's that so many of the teams in the league can trade places at the top and be national title good. No one in the Big XII is ever going to be national title good outside of Oklahoma and Texas. For all of Alabama's dominance during the Saban era, he has two SEC titles at Alabama, which is the same number of SEC titles that division rivals Auburn and LSU have since he's been head coach at Alabama.
Not many leagues would have schedules where the relief from stiff competition might be a trip to the Swamp to play Florida or having to step into a 100,000+ Neyland. After all, Florida and Tennessee aren't ranked. And that's "the break" you get before having to play Alabama, LSU, or whoever.
The National Football League would also like to chime in on the NFL talent produced at a Kansas State (who is ranked and has done well since Snyder came back) compared to the NFL talent coming out of Tennessee who hasn't been to a bowl game since 2010. Kansas State has put out 7 draftees in the last 5 drafts. Tennessee has put more than double that out and people in these parts point to the NFL draft as a measure for why Tennessee has struggled recently.
I respect the Big XII more than some other leagues, but I think Stoops is crazy if he doesn't see a difference.
JMO