Right but the point he was making was that it's so top heavy that the bottom 7 of the conference arent anything to write home about. There is this idea that just being associated with sec means you are something. But there are plenty of bottom feeder teams who will not play for hardawre in the sec anytime soon. At the time he made those comments the top half of the sec had went like 36-0 against the bottom half. nobody denies how great the upper echelon has been though.
Quite frankly, this is what OU fans don't quite understand about the "we are SEC" mentality. All teams within the SEC want to "hitch their wagon" to the conference mantra....or so it seems.
Tennessee is a historically great program with National Championships, All-Americans, and National Award winners. With merit, Tennessee can certainly stand on their own. IMHO, your program doesn't need to fall back on "we are in the SEC". That is something that Ole Miss, South Carolina, A*M (those types of programs) need to do in order to validate themselves.
OU doesn't give a rats a$$ about our conference....and never has! You would be hard pressed to find an OU fan that wants OSU, Texas, etc. to win on a weekly basis....unless it directly benefits us towards the end of the season in a championship scenario.
Stoops' comments have been taken out of context when what he was pointing out is that basically "most conferences have a great team or two/three, some good to mediocre teams, and some bottom feeders". And he has never backed away from giving credit to the SEC top tier programs. But if asked about it, he will usually give you his opinion (non-coach speak, which is refreshing) whether you agree with it or not.