Stop being manly

[ClearwaterVol]

Democrats. What did you start doing to lose your man card? Was it sitting down to pee? Buying a VW Bug? Wearing capris?

I find this funny since the conservatives have really commenced shrieking lately. Michelle wolf was so mean. She's vulgar and rude must be silenced.

IMNSHO, her biggest offense was not being funny. The censorship boys of the GOP feel that being mean to Sarah Huckabee and Trump is tantamount to treason. This administration is low hanging comedy fruit that she failed to reach.

 

[Orangeslice13]

I find this funny since the conservatives have really commenced shrieking lately. Michelle wolf was so mean. She's vulgar and rude just be silenced.

IMNSHO, her biggest offense was not being funny. The censorship boys of the GOP feel that being mean to Sarah Huckabee and Trump is tantamount to treason. This administration is low hanging comedy fruit that she failed to reach.

I’m no Republican but last time I checked defending the honor of a woman was a pretty “manly” thing to do. If you want to question their manhood you should start with the people who treat Michelle Obama with such contempt.
You know.....point out hypocrisy as opposed to calling them out for something they got right.

 

[luthervol]

Democrats. What did you start doing to lose your man card? Was it sitting down to pee? Buying a VW Bug? Wearing capris?

It seems to have coincided with the right's growing belief that manly = dumb. When you view intellectualism as a feminine trait, then you will conclude democrats aren't manly.

Despite what you believe, dragging your knuckles, breathing through your mouth, and playing with guns do not make up the man card test.

 

[Grand Vol]

It seems to have coincided with the right's growing belief that manly = dumb. When you view intellectualism as a feminine trait, then you will conclude democrats aren't manly.

Despite what you believe, dragging your knuckles, breathing through your mouth, and playing with guns do not make up the man card test.

No, if you wear capris and can write your name in the snow when you pee, you definitely have to turn in your man card.

(sorry GCB)

 

[ClearwaterVol]

I’m no Republican but last time I checked defending the honor of a woman was a pretty “manly” thing to do. If you want to question their manhood you should start with the people who treat Michelle Obama with such contempt.
You know.....point out hypocrisy as opposed to calling them out for something they got right.

I was not pointing out hypocrisy. I was pointing out that they were shrieking about a comedy act.

As for defending a woman's honor... Nobody was defending a woman's honor. That roast barely moved the needle of offensiveness, but the GOP has turned into the snowflake party. Constantly feeling the need to defend Trump from personal attacks. Ironically, they are defending a man that has made a cottage industry of name calling.

 

[Grand Vol]

I was not pointing out hypocrisy. I was pointing out that they were shrieking about a comedy act.

As for defending a woman's honor... Nobody was defending a woman's honor. That roast barely moved the needle of offensiveness, but the GOP has turned into the snowflake party. Constantly feeling the need to defend Trump from personal attacks. Ironically, they are defending a man that has made a cottage industry of name calling.

More than a few liberals said the "roast" was inappropriate.

However, some of you just gleefully giggle because you think it hits at Trump. You're perfectly happy to see people go after Huckabee-Sanders or anyone who is close to Trump and cheer them on. Hell, the left is perfectly happy when someone goes after Melania Trump even though she's not done one damn thing except get married to the person thy despise the most.

Name me one thing she's done that's been worthy of the ridicule and classless attacks against her. As First Ladies go, she's probably had the lowest profile of any of them in my lifetime, but that hasn't stopped the left from viciously attacking her whenever they get the chance. Or stopped them from going after Ivanka Trump any chance they get just because of who her father is.

Now, go ahead and do the typical "but MICHELLE OBAMA!" screech as if the two wrong make a right.

 

[Orangeslice13]

I was not pointing out hypocrisy.

You should have been
That’s the point.

 

[luthervol]

More than a few liberals said the "roast" was inappropriate.

However, some of you just gleefully giggle because you think it hits at Trump. You're perfectly happy to see people go after Huckabee-Sanders or anyone who is close to Trump and cheer them on. Hell, the left is perfectly happy when someone goes after Melania Trump even though she's not done one damn thing except get married to the person thy despise the most.

Name me one thing she's done that's been worthy of the ridicule and classless attacks against her. As First Ladies go, she's probably had the lowest profile of any of them in my lifetime, but that hasn't stopped the left from viciously attacking her whenever they get the chance. Or stopped them from going after Ivanka Trump any chance they get just because of who her father is.

Now, go ahead and do the typical "but MICHELLE OBAMA!" screech as if the two wrong make a right.

Viciously attacking Malania? I must have missed it. She's pretty much been given a pass, and I'm fine with that.

Now Ivanka is a different situation entirely. She chose to put herself it the middle of it all. She has power and influence due to no qualifications other than being Trump's daughter. As long as she wants to be a political player, she's fair game.

 

[Grand Vol]

Viciously attacking Malania? I must have missed it. She's pretty much been given a pass, and I'm fine with that.

Umm, don't read the news, do you?

Now Ivanka is a different situation entirely. She chose to put herself it the middle of it all. She has power and influence due to no qualifications other than being Trump's daughter. As long as she wants to be a political player, she's fair game.

You are correct. By being an adviser to her father, even informally, she has put herself in the line of fire.

Now, what draws the most ire out of you liberals? Her pro-woman stance? Her desire to assist working mothers? Her support of the Paris Treaty? Her donating to the National Urban League? Her opposition to human trafficking?

Which one hurts your feels the most?

 

[luthervol]

Umm, don't read the news, do you?



You are correct. By being an adviser to her father, even informally, she has put herself in the line of fire.

Now, what draws the most ire out of you liberals? Her pro-woman stance? Her desire to assist working mothers? Her support of the Paris Treaty? Her donating to the National Urban League? Her opposition to human trafficking?

Which one hurts your feels the most?

She is complicit.

She claims to support the causes that are important to the people from whom she wants support and approval, but does nothing to effectively support those causes.

 

[Orange_Crush]

She is complicit.

She claims to support the causes that are important to the people from whom she wants support and approval, but does nothing to effectively support those causes.

Dang! Democrats, meet the black voters.

 

[hog88]

She is complicit.

She claims to support the causes that are important to the people from whom she wants support and approval, but does nothing to effectively support those causes.

Donating time and money is doing nothing?

 

[ClearwaterVol]

More than a few liberals said the "roast" was inappropriate.

However, some of you just gleefully giggle because you think it hits at Trump. You're perfectly happy to see people go after Huckabee-Sanders or anyone who is close to Trump and cheer them on. Hell, the left is perfectly happy when someone goes after Melania Trump even though she's not done one damn thing except get married to the person thy despise the most.

Name me one thing she's done that's been worthy of the ridicule and classless attacks against her. As First Ladies go, she's probably had the lowest profile of any of them in my lifetime, but that hasn't stopped the left from viciously attacking her whenever they get the chance. Or stopped them from going after Ivanka Trump any chance they get just because of who her father is.

Now, go ahead and do the typical "but MICHELLE OBAMA!" screech as if the two wrong make a right.

When did I invoke Michelle's name? I have defended Michelle as I have defended all first ladies. I think the vitriol they get is unwarranted.

As for the roast. I think the biggest offense was the fact that it was not funny. Wolf missed the marked.

 

[Grand Vol]

She is complicit.

She claims to support the causes that are important to the people from whom she wants support and approval, but does nothing to effectively support those causes.

So...no different than any other politician?

However, feel free to point to where she hasn't done these things other than the Paris Treaty.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

She is complicit.

She claims to support the causes that are important to the people from whom she wants support and approval, but does nothing to effectively support those causes.

In all fairness, she has spoken out against her father more than anyone near him, but I can understand a daughter's desire not to actively work against her father. Quite frankly, she might make a better president than he.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

When you get through pondering that one, explain flowers. Expensive - very expensive weeds put in an over priced jug of some kind, and they will be dead in a week. You could actually have spent the money for something worthwhile, but those damn flowers ... Forty eight years of marriage this year, and I still don't get that one.

My wife would rather have a new socket set.

 

[Grand Vol]

In all fairness, she has spoken out against her father more than anyone near him, but I can understand a daughter's desire not to actively work against her father. Quite frankly, she might make a better president than he.

Liberals will loose their ****ing minds if we had 16 years of the Trump family in the White House.

ETA: Lose it more than they have already.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

A ****ing liberal lawyer told me what is offensive to me. Other than that, same old ****.

An overly sensitive moron called me a stud. I think he knows what he's talking about in this instance.

 

[Orange_Crush]

An overly sensitive moron called me a stud. I think he knows what he's talking about in this instance.

Like, an inflexible piece of wood?

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Gotcha. Poor oppressed white guy. So, when a black guy calls you cracker you get pissed off because the word represents several hundred years of oppression at the hands of the black race? GTFO out of here with that garbage.

Name one black person that has been oppressed that is currently alive living in these United States. Everyone has the same opportunities. You are FOS. But when boiled down, they are nothing but words and as tums said, I am better than that. But ****** has a special place in the lexicon that is offensive yet a badge of honor. It is the Dimwit party membership that keeps it alive.

 

[hog88]

Liberals will loose their ****ing minds if we had 16 years of the Trump family in the White House.

ETA: Lose it more than they have already.

It would almost be worth it. But I hope not.

 

[luthervol]

Donating time and money is doing nothing?

From the perspective of Trump's closest confidant; yea, that's pretty much nothing.

 

[luthervol]

In all fairness, she has spoken out against her father more than anyone near him, but I can understand a daughter's desire not to actively work against her father. Quite frankly, she might make a better president than he.

Of course she would make a better president, but that's an incredibly low bar.

 

[Grand Vol]

It would almost be worth it. But I hope not.

Imagine the implosion of the DNC if they can't lie and cheat to get the first woman elected and it ends up being Ivanka.

Doubtful, but it would be truly glorious.

 

[luthervol]

Imagine the implosion of the DNC if they can't lie and cheat to get the first woman elected and it ends up being Ivanka.

Doubtful, but it would be truly glorious.

She would probably be the third most liberal president in history. Not bad evolution for the republican party (faster than the normal leftward movement).