Thunder Good-Oil
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 47,372
- Likes
- 49,320
I’m not a drive-by poster, but thanks for the lesson. Did you know that Barnes has had half of the 4 SECT finals appearances in the 41 tournaments since Devoe won 2 games versus Auburn and UK in a 10 team SEC to win with the double-by in 1979?
TN sports really doesn’t need you, Basilio, or the idiot Cooper brothers stirring up **** at every turn either.
I never said that it’s THE goal. That absolutely does indicate that TN is competing at a high level and that Barnes isn’t a complete failure in tournaments that you Nega-Vol, Barnes Bashers chronically whine about.
You’ve got to be one of the easiest-to-please guys ever. You’re a dream fan for RB.
This is another year where we should be reminded that tourney success is a crap shoot
scott drew little to no tourney success before this year while his teams has been consistently rated in the top 10 the last number of years.
By looking at tourney success Few would be considered a bad underachieving coach I guess
Cronin at UCLA was considered to be a choke artist in the tourney and in fact was 1 pt away from losing in the playin game from continuing to be considered an awful tourney coach.
Tom Izzo once considered the greatest tourney coach of our time losses again in the first game and had some seriously embarrassing losses as high seeds lately
cal and coach K haven’t been to the final4 in a long time
Pearl lucked out in round 1 his final 4 year.
South Carolina proved the final 4 run meant zero to their future success
the point is while March madness is great entertainment its far from the best measuring stick for the success of a coach.
You guys turned this into a thread about Barnes and that’s understandable but that wasn’t the intent of the thread.
I was speaking more about the coaches i named in the OP and it applies to everyone. Cronin is the best example of what I am saying. Literally one more pt in that play in game and everyone would still consider him a “bad” tourney coach but now he’s all of a sudden different??? I think not. he’s the same coach and way too much emphasis has been placed on a few games.
and no one wants to talk about Frank martin either. Since he went to the Final 4 does that make him some great coach??? I think not
I remember arguing this years ago defending Cal and I got laughed at
Well his fellow coaches think so tooBut he is not our coach. College fans are the notorious at being double standard. If my coach is winning, then he is innocent until proven guilty. If he is losing, then he is guilty and we need to fire him and avoid paying a buyout. If it is the coach of another SEC school, then he guilty and they should pay a maximum buyout. If it is a coach of Kentucky or Alabama, then not only is he guilty but he also is the biggest cheater of all cheaters.
As a result, Cal is the biggest cheater of all cheaters.
An extreme minority of coaches win the championships. Barnes actually has one that came shortly after starting off with smoldering dumpster embers. TN is now practically living in the top 25.
Barnes has won one outright conference championship and conference tournament in 30+ years of coaching. Top 25 does’t mean a thing in basketball.
Drew’s been to two Elite Eights, FF, and won a NC since the $5 million dollar man reached an EE.
Rick Barnes changed jobs in that time span and took over a mess left by Donnie Tyndall, a cheater. You also fail to mention that in that same to frame Drew has been popped for cheating. I’d take Barnes everyday over a shitstain like Scott DrewDrew’s been to two Elite Eights, FF, and won a NC since the $5 million dollar man reached an EE.