rockytop9808
Ludicrous Display
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2009
- Messages
- 6,591
- Likes
- 8
Google likely can't afford to do it, due to advertising contracts and the like. Nobody expected them to shut down- the anti-SOPA message on their homepage is about all they really can do. They're still a business.
lulz.
Also, a nice bit, my senator Rony Wyden will engage in the most epic filibuster ever if this reaches the senate. He's planning on reading the names of each person in the country who has signed the petition against SOPA/PIPA on the senate floor.
No sh&t. Weakest attempt at a protest possible.
So what do you want them to do?
Violate their advertising contracts? Shut down all of their servers for mail, calendars, documents, phone services, etc. that schools and businesses use every day as part of their normal function?
They've ended up doing as much or more for awareness as Wikipedia, reddit, and Craigslist.
So what do you want them to do?
Violate their advertising contracts? Shut down all of their servers for mail, calendars, documents, phone services, etc. that schools and businesses use every day as part of their normal function?
They've ended up doing as much or more for awareness as Wikipedia, reddit, and Craigslist.
It's an awareness-raising action that has done more than its fair share. If you expected them to do any different, you're woefully ignorant.
It is woefully ignorant to believe the option taken is the only/best option available. trUT gave examples of things to do. I would imagine some of Google's brightest brainstorming in a room for 1 hour could do better than a black patch.
Why should they?
As I said, the two largest social networks out there are completely flooded with their link. They've done what they felt they needed to do. Neither you nor I are involved in their decision making.
Expecting things out of a business is dumb, especially when they actually went out of their way (no matter how small) to achieve this end.
I never said they should but they chose to take interest in it. I didn't tell them to but they decided to and I don't think their path to success has evolved around half assed mediocre attempts at anything.
So you're saying you intentionally avoided the link because you knew what was behind it?
I'm saying it was a lackluster attempt at joining the protest on their most visible page. Their banner is some new design/art/etc. almost everyday. I guarantee there were people that saw it, paid no attention to it and kept right on Googling.
And I also bet those people get on Facebook and see the plethora of links to Google's page anyway.
Their action has been cited more by my peers than the Wikipedia and Craigslist blackouts. It's been just as effective as the blackouts. Arguing that "they could have done more" is pointless, both because they didn't and because they had no obligation or need to.