Is this a question or statement? I read it like three times, in three different voices.
You have issues with seeing question marks at the end of sentences? I was wondering if anyone knew what the normal protocol is for a police department when something like this happens. I would assume that the very first thing a police department would do in a case like this, would be to investigate the scene where the alleged crime took place.
You have issues with seeing question marks at the end of sentences? I was wondering if anyone knew what the normal protocol is for a police department when something like this happens. I would assume that the very first thing a police department would do in a case like this, would be to investigate the scene where the alleged crime took place.
Was listening to 92.9 the game in Atlanta and they brought this up and were convinced that Butch Jones is going to get fired, and went on about how this could shake things up in the east. What asses.
In general, the sentence should have started with "Is it" instead of "It is".
While your "It is" does work. It is unknown that it works until you reach the end of the sentence and actually see the question mark. Using "Is it" from the beginning shows the reader that it in fact a question from the very beginning.
And that's just what they did. It takes more than a minute to get a search warrant written and signed.
But contact the head coach before they investigate? Just sounds a little odd to do. If someone files a charge against me, do they give my boss a call and let them know they are about to get a search warrant and investigate?
Very good article. Thanks!
"In the court of public opinion, you dont settle unless you did something wrong. If UT settles, many would assume the university actually did create a culture of rape even if the terms of the settlement included no admission of guilt."
"For starters, that is the nature of such lawsuits. The allegations of wrongdoing provide the first wave of coverage in the media. On top of that, there is a cozy relationship between the plaintiffs attorneys and some in the media, which has affected the nature of the reporting, some of which has been far, far over the top."
"Paying an out-of-court settlement will not make those perceptions go away. The only way to do it is to confront the charges in a courtroom, not in the court of public opinion."
The odd part to me is that law enforcement called Butch "hours before" they searched the apartment (according to the article). If you're a defense attorney, you're gonna be all over that.
Those guys are absolutely clueless, especially the afternoon guys. During the whole Butch-Jones-Jim-Harbaugh, they were yukking it up and going on and on about how great Harbaugh is. They suckle at the teet of UGA and fawn over their beat writers, and whenever they invite those writers on the air, the little time they devote to Tennessee is to degrade them and assure themselves that they can't possibly win the East this year.
They're excellent for discussion about the Hawks, though.
There's a thread on Volquest claiming posts from their message board are being used in lawsuit filings by the plaintiffs. Does anyone have access to the filings? I would like to see if any thing from Volnation was in there.
I think its probably to show that Knoxville was too biased.
However, I wonder how much of their overall case was based on message board fodder. How thin is their case?
If they used any of my posts, they have no case at all.
Thanks. Climer never seemed to write favorable articles regarding the Vols while he worked for the Tennessean; however, his tone in this article sounds like even he disagrees with the way the Tennessean has reported on the case - in particular, the comment regarding the "cozy relationship between the plaintiffs attorneys and some in the media."
That makes sense. Because all our fans are in Knoxville and none in Nashville. They have no case and are trying to make an illusion of fire with lots of smoke.