Pepe_Silvia
#mikehawk
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2006
- Messages
- 22,481
- Likes
- 44,040
Sure countries can they change policies from one leader to another... Neville Chamberlain and Churchill POTUS is called the Commander in Chief for a reason. This was a no win situation...look at what happened today with the US base getting in between fighting...we can't fire on a NATO ally and they were coming no matter what we didNon-interventionism, when you are a superpower, is isolationism. You don't just get to decide one day that you're no longer a superpower and no longer have responsibilities or moral obligations.
Sure countries can they change policies from one leader to another... Neville Chamberlain and Churchill POTUS is called the Commander in Chief for a reason. This was a no win situation...look at what happened today with the US base getting in between fighting...we can't fire on a NATO ally and they were coming no matter what we did
So, if NATO members can't attack other members, why did our troops need to get out of the way? Seems to me that Trump didn't want Turkey to be in the "impossible situation" of not being able to attack our Kurdish allies operating with our troops. It's not as though Northern Syria is Turkish sovereign land.
Maybe I don't understand "4D chess", or maybe it's that I do understand that when someone is compromised, they do all the compromising.
It has all the appearance of Trump bowing to Turkey, because that's what it is.
Either, honestly, but was referring to the not being able to rely on NATO to come to the rescue. Makes perfect sense, though.
Some interesting scenarios I can imagine, although Turkey seems to have the angles covered.
Not really.
It's an interesting exercise discussing the Middle East, but when the guy in charge puts little to no thought into its future, at some point one wonders, "Why bother?"
It can’t be defended.
Who have you got us confused with on this issue kid? Perhaps you should do some sober reading before you drunk post.@Grand Vol @NorthDallas40 please help your brethren here. They need some spin. Do the Kurds not pay as much as the Saudi royalty for our mercenaries even though they didn’t blow up our skyscrapers? I thought the whole reason we took our 50 troops out of the Middle East last week was because it was time to leave the Middle East! What changed since then where we send 2000 troops to the prince? Is renting our troops out cool? Do the Kurds need a trump motel for protection? How do you explain that to the first family that loses their son or daughter for guarding oil? Inquiring minds want to know!