ClearwaterVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2008
- Messages
- 16,188
- Likes
- 17,783
If that were the case I'd have been at the airport with my family.
How many of the ~200 left was this the case for?
I also question the continual "ISIS-K is the mortal enemy of the Taliban" rhetoric like they are 2 completely different entities that never cooperate. Didn't the Taliban release a bunch of ISIS-K that were imprisoned at Bagram? Seems if you have a chance to disappear some of the worst of the worst of your mortal enemy you take advantage rather than turn them loose.
Lara Logan explained this. They go between multiple terrorist groups. They are all terrorists that fight each other but hate the infidels. Elitists tend to be more terrified so they think placating and playing nice will do the trick which put everyone at jeopardy when they are in charge. Conservatives tend to call them what they are.
Just seemed to me a way for the administration to make the Taliban look like they're borderline allies to us. More spinning the situation than accurately representing it.
In every speech or press conference they used those terms "sworn" enemy or "mortal" enemy.
how many is the right number?
I've heard multiple stories from reporters and from groups (non-gov) trying to get people out that are people in line at the airport that can't get through the gates.
you are making an argument that some responsibility lies with those left behind, Clearwater is calling them all morons.
I'm pointing out that the "morons" label is not reflective of reality
I was asking how many were staying behind voluntarily because their family couldn’t get cleared.
If there were individuals at the gate waiving American passports and were turned away or not let in, that is a problem. My first question would be what was done different by them than the others that made it through.
to your first question - I don't know the number but let's say 50 of the 200. Are those 50 morons as CWV claims. All I'm doing is dispelling the myth that you are a moron if you didn't get out when "you had the chance". Some didn't really have the chance so blaming them or belittling them is callous.
For the second question see the article I just posted from WSJ - looks like the early rush wasn't vetted and the bulk of people who got through (were let through?) were not the priority people including citizens.
if you recall then we had intermittent gate closings and advice to not come to the airport.
And his detractors seem to want the opposite - all blame and no credit.
The last American soldier has left Afghanistan. That is something universally agreed upon in this thread as good. It happened under his watch.
How it happened leaves a lot to be desired but he actually pulled the trigger and got it done. I’m not really sure how you even argue that.
Your quote is wrong.
On purpose.
And efforts continue with assistance of allies and even the Taliban to some extent.
Don't change the facts to weave a new, false narrative.
If you don’t believe he is in charge, then why are you blaming him for the bungled withdrawal? If you answer because he is President, then I don’t know how you don’t say he gets credit for making the decision to leave.
I’m not following why you can have it
both ways.
He gets blame because he is President, but for any credit, he wasn’t really the one in charge?