Teacher tells kids Santa isn’t real

#126
#126
InVOLuntary said:
Lol. Merry Christmas, Huff. I'm not crying, I'm literally laughing at your obsession. Your obsession amazes me. The fact that you spent time searching for a way to turn this around on Trump, speaks volumes. It's sad.
Click to expand...

I think I have a pretty healthy and balanced take on Trump. He's good when he does good (Syria, Afghanistan, Gorsuch, prison reform, deregulation). He's bad when he does bad (protectionism, regulation, unconstitutional gun grab, immigration, corporate welfare, and other forms of cronyism). Only butthurt little children have this idea that I'm blindly opposed to Trump.
 
#128
#128
n_huffhines said:
I think I have a pretty healthy and balanced take on Trump. He's good when he does good (Syria, Afghanistan, Gorsuch, prison reform, deregulation). He's bad when he does bad (protectionism, regulation, unconstitutional gun grab, immigration, corporate welfare, and other forms of cronyism). Only butthurt little children have this idea that I'm blindly opposed to Trump.
Click to expand...
Then why do you use any opportunity to bash him? I don't even like Trump. Hate a lot about him. But I also know what the alternative was. Critisize his policies, his tweeting, his persona, but seriously, digging up something about him exposing Santa to youths to try and bring him into this? Ok, whatever gets your chestnuts all warm and toasty. Frankly I think it's petty, but that's just me.
 
Last edited:
#130
#130
The Trump thing with the kid on the phone is not a big deal, of course. It just again goes to show what an out of touch, out of place, goofball he is. The real funny part is him trying to rationalize with a kid about how, at seven years old, the belief in Santa is "marginal." Just a weird way to talk to an 8 or 9 year old kid.

His George Bush grocery scanner episode. Though I doubt Trump will show the same ability to later laugh at himself as did Bush.
 
#131
#131
InVOLuntary said:
Then why do you use any opportunity to bash him? I don't even like Trump. Hate a lot about him. But I also know what the alternative was. Critisize his policies, his tweeting, his persona, but seriously, digging up something about him exposing Santa to youths to try and bring him into this? Ok, whatever gets your chestnuts all warm and toasty. Frankly I think it's petty, but that's just me.
Click to expand...

I didn't even bash him. I shared a link that quoted him. It's not a big deal, it's just supposed to funny. It's not supposed to cause you to meltdown, but Trump fanboys aren't the most stable people, apparently.
 
#132
#132
n_huffhines said:
I didn't even bash him. I shared a link that quoted him. It's not a big deal, it's just supposed to funny. It's not supposed to cause you to meltdown, but Trump fanboys aren't the most stable people, apparently.
Click to expand...
No meltdown here. Needed that laugh. Keep them coming. TDS is a real thing. Hope you find happiness. Apparently you think everyone is as miserable as you are.
 
#133
#133
InVOLuntary said:
No meltdown here. Needed that laugh. Keep them coming. TDS is a real thing. Hope you find happiness. Apparently you think everyone is as miserable as you are.
Click to expand...

Yes, I keep saying the same thing. You have it. I can't even post a link to a Trump quote without you crying about Trump bashing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MercyPercy
#135
#135
n_huffhines said:
I think I have a pretty healthy and balanced take on Trump. He's good when he does good (Syria, Afghanistan, Gorsuch, prison reform, deregulation). He's bad when he does bad (protectionism, regulation, unconstitutional gun grab, immigration, corporate welfare, and other forms of cronyism). Only butthurt little children have this idea that I'm blindly opposed to Trump.
Click to expand...

Woah there hombre .. what “ GUN GRAB” ?
 
#137
#137
lawgator1 said:
The Trump thing with the kid on the phone is not a big deal, of course. It just again goes to show what an out of touch, out of place, goofball he is. The real funny part is him trying to rationalize with a kid about how, at seven years old, the belief in Santa is "marginal." Just a weird way to talk to an 8 or 9 year old kid.

His George Bush grocery scanner episode. Though I doubt Trump will show the same ability to later laugh at himself as did Bush.
Click to expand...

Yeah, didn't stop the media from going bonkers over it.

As usual of course...
 
#138
#138
1972 Grad said:
That would be the bump stocks. They can kill on their own.
Click to expand...

I kept watching them push it further and further until now it’s “ a gun grab “ . NOPE , it’s a gimmick product you can put on your fire arm if you chose . But in no way is it a gun grab .
 
#139
#139
0nelilreb said:
I kept watching them push it further and further until now it’s “ a gun grab “ . NOPE , it’s a gimmick product you can put on your fire arm if you chose . But in no way is it a gun grab .
Click to expand...

It's still a betrayal of the right's principles.
 
#141
#141
n_huffhines said:
Semantics-arguing boot licker
Click to expand...

Tell you what since you are so big on facts ( ironic after that post of yours ) I’ll take the “ Gun “ you take the “ bump stock “ , we will both shoot at each other and let the facts fall where they will . Saying that a ban on bump stocks is a “gun grab” is disingenuous at best , a straight out lie at worst .
 
#145
#145
0nelilreb said:
But it’s not , in anyway , shape or form a ...“gun grab”. Bump stocks are not a firearm and not a protected right .
Click to expand...
They are a protected right. The constitution makes no mention of a bump stock, so when we read the pages of the parchment, we come to two relevant clauses that address bump stocks (aside from the 2nd):
AMMENDMENT X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

AMENDMENT IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MercyPercy, Pepe_Silvia and marcusluvsvols
#146
#146
midnight orange said:
They are a protected right. The constitution makes no mention of a bump stock, so when we read the pages of the parchment, we come to two relevant clauses that address bump stocks (aside from the 2nd):
AMMENDMENT X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

AMENDMENT IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Click to expand...

Then take it up in the courts . Simple .
 
#148
#148
n_huffhines said:
The 2nd amendment doesn't say "firearms". You are a republican boot licker, plain and simple.
Click to expand...

And you are an idiot if you think banning something that is an add on to a product is a “Gun Grab “ pure and simple . You claim to be about facts and you are defending a lie . Change your statement or stop whining .
 
#150
#150
0nelilreb said:
And you are an idiot if you think banning something that is an add on to a product is a “Gun Grab “ pure and simple . You claim to be about facts and you are defending a lie . Change your statement or stop whining .
Click to expand...

You're still making semantic arguments. If you're cool with it because it's not technically a "gun grab" and a bump stock is not technically a "firearm", then by your logic, they could just ban bullets.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top