I don't know. Do you think they are that much more talented than Bama at CB... so much so that they can cover UT without being "physical" and drawing PIs? A lot of that comes down to officiating I guess but there's little secret that UGA like everyone else is going to man up against one or more of UT's WRs on most plays.
You mention 18... it easily could have been 30 if they'd called some of the obvious holds on Bama's OL. There is a picture floating around here somewhere showing all 4 of UT's pass rushers being held by the jersey on the same play.
I won't claim to know if UGA's FG kicker is that much better than Bama's. Then again... maybe UT won't fumble for a scoop and score with an opportunity to put the game away? Maybe UT's DL will get home more often against Bennett who while deserving of respect... isn't B Young? Maybe UT doesn't make some of the mistakes they made vs Bama?
Both teams make mistakes in every game. UT and Bama were two very good teams operating at a very high level and forcing each other to make mistakes with the intense pressure they put on each other. They were also two teams that matched strength for strength pretty well.
I don't know if that's the case with UGA. The main reason is that UGA hasn't played a very difficult schedule. They haven't played a single team in the upper half of the SEC. That doesn't mean they aren't completely dominant and awesome... it just means the "proof" is lacking. We KNOW that UT can go toe to toe with two of the best teams in the SEC and come out on top. UGA hasn't proven that.
Then there's three other sneaky guys hanging around too. I wouldn't want to be a CB isolated on McCoy. Then you have Fant and Warren... just hanging out waiting for everyone else to be covered.
The second touchdown drive was 15 plays long, might have been the highest time of possession for any of our drives this year. Of course, what value is there to showing down the opposing offense if you still don’t prevent them from scoring? Additionally I felt like we played that series so methodically to prove a point and set up deep passing later in the game.Did you watch the Kentucky game? We scored TDs on 4 of 6 possessions. The first punt was a result of an offensive PI call putting us at 1st and 25. The only other punt was after the first INT and hooker was sacked on first down them short-armed a throw to Hyatt wide open for a first down. They absolutely did not slow us down by forcing the RBs to beat them. Where did you get that from? We scored more points in the first half than they have given up in a game all season.
Based on what? I think I'm beginning to smell troll. If you have proof of that stat, I wouldn't mind having a good source for things like QB pressures. However Carter is currently 21st for UGA in tackles. He's averaging one tackle per game. He has not recorded a TFL or sack. He recorded 8.5 TFLs in 21 with 3 sacks and 27 tackles in 15 games.of all those mentioned, 88 is the best.
Maybe one of the best OL's in CFB can block him? That might work.gotta find a way to keep him from blowing up in the backfield.
Again, wouldn't mind you sharing that source. I have looked for a site that records QB hurries/pressures instead of just sacks.I think I read where he only played 13 plays last week but had 9 pressures or something.
UGA has talent in the secondary. But their CB's are young. They trust Mingo (Soph) to lock down a receiver to free them up to cover the rest of the field. They have a Soph at the other CB and 4 Fr backing the two of them up.If its 1v1 and I need a 3 and 8 I’m going to McCoy. He earned that going across the middle against Alabama. Big catch in the biggest game to that point in the season. I really don’t think anyone is going to out muscle him on a 50/50 ball with Hook throwing. I may be wrong I just don’t see it
Only when you have good reasons that others have overlooked.Sometimes picking the upset has value.
The second touchdown drive was 15 plays long, might have been the highest time of possession for any of our drives this year. Of course, what value is there to showing down the opposing offense if you still don’t prevent them from scoring? Additionally I felt like we played that series so methodically to prove a point and set up deep passing later in the game.
Someone on youtube said that the way you stop or limit UT is to stop their run without adding guys to the box. Not wrong. If you can stop UT's run game primarily with 4 DLs and a LB then you can give help to cover the WRs.
But that is a big challenge. The OL is playing well. UT has two RBs who are running well.... and if you figure that out... Hooker can hurt you too.
I heard someone say yesterday the Saban said TN was easy to prepare for and Miss State was a harder offense to prepare for.
He didn’t say they could stop TN.
Speaking as a former wrestler your best take down move is the one your opponent knows is coming but they still can’t stop it.
What offense as good as UT's has UGA stopped with their "A game"?FYI - I'm picking ga to win this week as well. reasoning is that if the Vols play their A game and Ga plays their A game, Ga will win.
FYI - I'm picking ga to win this week as well. reasoning is that if the Vols play their A game and Ga plays their A game, Ga will win.
It means UGA is the defending National champion and has won a lot of big games the past few years. Right or wrong, we’re the ones that have to prove something.Ok. And why is this true exactly? Nobody can say if both teams play their A game then uga wins. That’s just foolish to say. What does that even mean? If our offense has an ‘A’ day then we score a bunch of points. If that happens…how can ugas defense have played their ‘A’ game? And the same holds true if their D has its best game, then that means our offense likely struggled…. Nonsense….
I think UT and Bama both played their "A game". They did everything they could to minimize mistakes and perform at a high level under extreme pressure from the opponent. People could argue Bama's penalties... but if they hadn't played so physical in the secondary would that have been their "A game"? Both teams made mistakes because the other was bringing it.Ok. And why is this true exactly? Nobody can say if both teams play their A game then uga wins. That’s just foolish to say. What does that even mean? If our offense has an ‘A’ day then we score a bunch of points. If that happens…how can ugas defense have played their ‘A’ game? And the same holds true if their D has its best game, then that means our offense likely struggled…. Nonsense….
One team is battle tested this year. The other isn't.…Which is a very valid argument. Just saying it’s not a “foolish” take. One team is battle tested over the course of years. One isn’t. And the game is in Athens. I love our chances, but it’s not an ideal scenario.
Someone on youtube said that the way you stop or limit UT is to stop their run without adding guys to the box. Not wrong. If you can stop UT's run game primarily with 4 DLs and a LB then you can give help to cover the WRs.
But that is a big challenge. The OL is playing well. UT has two RBs who are running well.... and if you figure that out... Hooker can hurt you too.
…Which is a very valid argument. Just saying it’s not a “foolish” take. One team is battle tested over the course of years. One isn’t. And the game is in Athens. I love our chances, but it’s not an ideal scenario.
I think UT and Bama both played their "A game". They did everything they could to minimize mistakes and perform at a high level under extreme pressure from the opponent. People could argue Bama's penalties... but if they hadn't played so physical in the secondary would that have been their "A game"? Both teams made mistakes because the other was bringing it.
…Which is a very valid argument. Just saying it’s not a “foolish” take. One team is battle tested over the course of years. One isn’t. And the game is in Athens. I love our chances, but it’s not an ideal scenario.