(Ohio Vol @ Jun 14 said:
gonygonygo,
The offense has been blamed because it's come up short more often than the defense has, particularly in games where it's supposed to really turn it on. If the defense allows 17 against Florda, 6 against Alabama, 16 against South Carolina, and 28 against Vanderbilt then those should all be victories instead of losses. Had that been the case, 2005 would have been a 9-2 season instead of 5-6. The defense last year allowed 205 points against, which is the lowest since 1999 (and trails that team and the 98 team by 11 and 16 points, respectively).
I'm not going to say that the defense is stellar; any offensive coordinator going into a game against a Chavis-led defense knows that draws, counters, and counter treys are absolute gold. Look at what Florida did in the first half of 2004 (running the misdirections) versus the second half (when they didn't), or the SEC title game in 2001 when it was nothing but draw-draw-draw.
As I mentioned here and elsewhere, how predictable the offensive playcalling is really doesn't matter; the trick is being able to run those few predictable plays better than the defense can prevent them from being run. I refer again to Nebraska of the 1990s, with a playbook that was primarily four plays 75% of the time.
Why are you showing stats about the 2005 defense when the comments I made about the defense were PRE-2005?! :banghead:
The defense was definitely the strength of last year's team... a VERY bad team. They were good, but slightly overrated. Alabama's offense was horrible once they lost Tyrone Prothro. South Carolina's offense wasn't that good. Spurrier was working with inferior talent. 28 point to Vanderbilt is nothing to brag about. Florida's offense struggled with a QB like Leak who isn't right guy for their system. We allowed Georgia to run up and down the field on us. We were lucky to keep it as close as we did. The score did not indicate the azz whooping they gave us! Notre Dame ran an offensive clinic on our higly touted defense. Don't get me wrong, the defense was good last year, but not as great as everyone wants to believe. The offense just happened to be so sorry that they looked that much better. Any decent offense could have put up around 30 pts. on that defense last year. Especially when our offense turns it over and leaves them backed up to defend a short field.
In the past (<2005), the defense has come up short many of times!!
Remember that game against Georgia (here at Neyland) when Travis Stephens took that screen pass and scored at the end?? We left 40+ seconds for Georgia to score (they needed a touchdown), and the game seemed all but over. Then what?? Georgia EASILY drives down and scores a winning touchdown-on the road-at Neyland Stadium-with seconds to spare.
Remember that game against Florida when they won the game on the last possession??? The one where the guy caught and dropped the ball in the endzone.
The 2000 Cotton Bowl, we were dominated on BOTH sides of the ball. We were dominated in both Peach Bowls, giving up 30+ points in each.
The Florida game we barely won in 2004 and the defense struggled to get stops down the stretch. It pretty much came down to who had the ball last.
We made Cedric Cobbs (Arkansas) look like Jerome Bettis, running all over our defense.
I remember many of games when I thought the team we just played had a future 1st rounder tailback, only to see him shut down the following week. That led me to the conclusion that since 2001, we've had pretty poor defenses.
Our offenses haven't been great, but they take more heat than they deserve.
I think the biggest problem with the team cannot really be a matter of the offense vs. defense blame game. It's an overall talent drop-off. I just don't think we have the best players in the nation anymore. You can say what you want about the coaching & development, but I just do not think those players are THAT good anymore.
Programs have their ups and downs, that is a fact of sports. Even the Yankees don't win the World Series every year!