bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 73,498
- Likes
- 47,921
That update does not, which is puzzling given our need and what he says he’s looking for…unless he’s just been a lock to play for him former coach and the rest was just for show
Please don’t talk yourself into that nonsense. It’s a failure if we don’t get any kind of PG in the portal.
Again, right now, it’s not looking good.
The staff has felt very good about Ledlum for awhile and taking the visit here seems like good news, and it’s a good update on Knecht as well…but when going into the portal season knowing PG was the biggest need it’s a big head scratching to see where we are there.Tech is putting together an NIL offer for Perry. I think we’re wise to wait until after that. If he visits, I think we have more to offer in every way. From what I understand we want to see their hand first. If he shuts it down when he gets the offer, nothing wasted. I’ve also heard Knecht was on the brink of committing elsewhere, but would read a visit as a get. Apparently we did a video tour of facilities and broke down film with him, and he loved all of it. As for Ledlum, we seem to have a lot of quiet confidence. I think he’ll decide Monday, and everyone seems to like our chances there.
I think you need to land 1 of Ledlum/Knecht to go with those 2, that would be a bit of an underwhelming haul. Fair or not people are going to look at Glover/Gainey as we went and took 2 easy pieces of low hanging fruit that required little to no effort.Thinking the same thing this morning. I’m not going to complain about Glover and Gaines if everything collapses elsewhere.
The fact that Perry is potentially on the table makes me want to agree, but I'm totally fine with ZZ owning the point. Ques would be a much better backup there than we had this year for sure. If Santi comes back, ZZ gets healthy, I'd be happy with a Santi/Zeigler/Glover/Mashack/Dillone/Edwards backcourt.Glover and Gainey doesn’t move the needle at all.
Both meh
The fact that Perry is potentially on the table makes me want to agree, but I'm totally fine with ZZ owning the point. Ques would be a much better backup there than we had this year for sure. If Santi comes back, ZZ gets healthy, I'd be happy with a Santi/Zeigler/Glover/Mashack/Dillone/Edwards backcourt.
PG A: 14.7 ppg, 2.5 rpg, 2.1 apg, 48% FG, 37.8% 3PT, 84.7% FT
PG B: 17.3 ppg, 3.4 rpg, 2.1 apg, 43.7% FG, 41.3% 3PT, 87.2% FT
PG C: 10.7 ppg, 2.7 rpg, 5.4 apg, 37.5% FG, 31.1% 3PT, 83.3% FT
PG D: 12.9 ppg, 3.6 rpg, 6.0 apg, 44.1% FG, 46.6% 3PT, 75.9% FT
Put the best 4/5 teams each have played and their stats against them. Glover doesn’t have any games against real competition
there’s a reason he is a 3* portal player and there’s a reason no one hardly has reached out to him
But then you'll argue that the "best" teams aren't that good...and then you'll explain that Player A's team still loss and it doesn't matter etc. etc. etc.
I didn't make a statement about any of the 4 I listed. You're making assumptions that I'm now advocating for Glover when all I've done is share 4 players and their stats.
The staff has felt very good about Ledlum for awhile and taking the visit here seems like good news, and it’s a good update on Knecht as well…but when going into the portal season knowing PG was the biggest need it’s a big head scratching to see where we are there.
The fact that Perry is potentially on the table makes me want to agree, but I'm totally fine with ZZ owning the point. Ques would be a much better backup there than we had this year for sure. If Santi comes back, ZZ gets healthy, I'd be happy with a Santi/Zeigler/Glover/Mashack/Dillone/Edwards backcourt.
It’ll be hard to find anyone who isn’t feeling WTF on no PG. I don’t think Perry is dead. I just think Clark wants to see if there is an opening. If we get Perry on campus, I think he’ll commit. I’m sweating losing Santi and Phillips if we can’t get another ball handler. I’m a huge believer in the kids we signed last year, but we don’t have five players who are game ready.
It's not a failure until we have a poor season.
We're coming off a Sweet Sixteen season where at one point we reached #1, this after our "failure" in the portal where we only landed Key.
It's not about the pieces on the board, it's about how you play the game with them. I want a PG and I'm not talking myself into any nonsense. Barnes & staff have shown over and over that if they have the right guys (attitude and work ethic wise) they can win as a team. The overall talent on this year's team even without Santi or JJJ returning will be the best it's been during the Barnes era. If you look at how many top 100 players we'll have on the roster.
So I get that you've very much been in panic mode over the portal...but that's not what matters. You can "win" the portal and lay a egg in the season.
Just remember we don't hang any banners based on transfer portal rankings.
Not landing a PG is a disaster, IMO. No way around it. I'd believe that even if ZZ hadn't been hurt.I'll feel less concerned if Santi returns, but if he's gone AND we miss on Perry I'm pretty worried...
I think with Santi returning, Mashack/Freddie/BJ all having a full off-season to learn and run the point while ZZ heals would have me feeling fine with missing on a true PG. But I REALLY want us to land a true PG either way.