bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 73,847
- Likes
- 49,743
This kid is a mutant. Not sure what’ll happen with him. His wingspan is very short for his height. He has a crap vertical, and shot terribly last year. He never adjusted to college speed or physicality. His dad and Juwan Howard are tight. I don’t see him making an Inspire team. I think he’ll underperform wherever he lands.Hopefully he was humbled a bit
This kid is a mutant. Not sure what’ll happen with him. His wingspan is very short for his height. He has a crap vertical, and shot terribly last year. He never adjusted to college speed or physicality. His dad and Juwan Howard are tight. I don’t see him making an Inspire team. I think he’ll underperform wherever he lands.
It’s weird his piss poor measurables went unnoticed till he got to Memphis. The T-rex arms were always there
You have a better eye for talent than I do, then.Due to my brother, I was able to attend the Jordan Brand Classic game in Chicago. Pretty much the same players as the McDonalds game but also with a few changes. Smaller intimate session though.
First of all, these high school kids are unbelievable talents. I saw things that I just do not remember happening when I was in high school.
Second, Duke is getting some good ones. Kyle Filipowski and Derek Lively are bigs that move like guards/small forwards.
Third, Nick Smith. Remember that name as he is coming to the SEC and he was BY FAR the best player there. I had heard buzz from my brother and other scouts that he was the most impressive player there during the drills and practices leading up the game, and he is the real deal.
Fourth, the biggest surprise to me was that you could tell the difference between a "5 Star" player and a "4 Star" player in this game. I guess with all the AAU games, creation of basketball academies that play national schedules, all star games such as this one, etc...that the scouts get a lot of opportunities to see these kids matched against each other and thus can group them into 5 vs 4 star rankings based on actual head to head opportunities, but I really did not expect noticeable separation. Players that stood out as really strong...when I would look them up...they were a "5 Star" whereas players I found got kind of lost tended to be the "4 Stars". Surprised me.
i mean JJJ was rated as a top 10 player for a while & was dominant. so he might’ve actually been better at that momentYou have a better eye for talent than I do, then.
I recall watching Springer play against JJJ at an AAU tourney in Charlotte a few years ago and came away thinking JJJ the better player.
Guess I better stick to my day job.
You have a better eye for talent than I do, then.
I recall watching Springer play against JJJ at an AAU tourney in Charlotte a few years ago and came away thinking JJJ the better player.
Guess I better stick to my day job.
Good points, age does make a difference.I don't know about the eye for talent, but these players were all in the same class. I would assume that if you watched JJJ and Springer play against each other in an AAU game a few years ago, then JJJ was one or two years older than Springer. Likely a 17 year old playing against a 15/16 year old? You know how much the average kid matures between 15 and 17. Maybe you were right at that time. Regardless, both were 5 Stars and I specifically mentioned telling the difference in this game between the 5 Stars and 4 Stars within the same graduating class. It still does not mean the other kids can mature in college, work harder, see improvement and leap frog.