Tennessee's Anti-LGBTQ LT. Governor, Randy McNally, Loves Naked Pics of Gay Man

#28
#28
BowlBrother85 said:
I'm admittedly not a Constitutional scholar ...

... but a state government prohibiting a form of entertainment on public property, based on how the performers are dressed, could be interpreted as an infringement on their 1st Amendment rights, which protects freedom of expression.
Click to expand...

I think in some part, if this is challenged all the way up to SCOTUS, it would run counter to 1A. I can see where local public decency laws would also be given consideration and be respected. SCOTUS does strike down some parts of laws and uphold others.
 
#30
#30
joevol33 said:
It's definitely interesting that the left is so furious that Tennessee, and Florida, want to stop the men playing dress up from being around children. If you notice, none of their arguments are about the men being able to Express themselves, or dress up like they pretend to be, not one single one. It's only when they're restricted from being around children, that's when they start threads and make comments on any social media.
Click to expand...

It's because the supporters of this bill clearly don't give a f*** about the kids. It's a tastlessly veiled way of *****ing on the q**er community.

If it were about the kids, cursing would be illegal on public property. Thongs would be illegal on the beach. Street preachers would be banned on street corners. Any street performer singing about pg-13+ matter would be illegal.
 
#31
#31
joevol33 said:
I agree with you 100%, but I'll challenge you to show me a thread, or even a post by anyone on the left that had an issue before state government banned it from schools, or near schools.


Edit to say, while i agree that the government shouldn't tell people how they should dress. I'm in agreement about keeping mentally unstable people who play dress up away from children. You can't make fun of people and call them anti science over covid stuff, then argue that a man in a dress is a woman.
Click to expand...

See Joe, here's the thing. There would be an actual exchange of ideas, but then you go and broadly paint the whole drag community as mentally unstable and try and imply that drag queens are all trans.

It just makes you sound ignorant and willfully dumb as **** when it comes to this matter, and well, that kind of makes it impossible to debate with you about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines and MercyPercy
#34
#34
Regarding McNally, it would be nice if elected officials actually believed in what they stood for,but that's a lot to ask of them no matter what side of the aisle they're on. In an ideal world, it would be nice. That's politics in a nutshell. A lot of hypocrites and sellouts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lawrence Wright and Vol737
#35
#35
The part that the deranged leftists gloss over or leave out is that it is sexualized performances being exposed to children is what is being targeted. Adult cabaret. That is what the legislation is aimed at, not some dude that wants to play dress up. The leftists are just using it to promote their made up narrative that the right is bigoted. They are chronic liars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123, W.TN.Orange Blood, OrangeBoro and 3 others
#36
#36
DinkinFlicka said:
See Joe, here's the thing. There would be an actual exchange of ideas, but then you go and broadly paint the whole drag community as mentally unstable and try and imply that drag queens are all trans.

It just makes you sound ignorant and willfully dumb as **** when it comes to this matter, and well, that kind of makes it impossible to debate with you about it.
Click to expand...
You sure do seem awfully triggered by someone opposing dress up🤣. You can't debate, you'd look dumb trying to explain the science behind a man pretending to be a woman, period. You're exactly what I was talking about, triggered as crap because these perverts can't be around kids. Like it, lump it, I don't care. You're so freaking unstable it's hilarious, the instant you see a comment you don't like you can't debate, you call names like a middle school kid. Guys pretending to be women aren't women, period. You want to debat6that? Show me in the science how it's possible, or go hug a blanket with your personal feelings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DixieVol, BigOrangeTrain, jp1 and 6 others
#38
#38
Self-hatred is real. Sometimes that is mixed with envy of those living open lives. But it's mainly about loathing one's self.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pennheel
#39
#39
Thunder Good-Oil said:
The part that the deranged leftists gloss over or leave out is that it is sexualized performances being exposed to children is what is being targeted. Adult cabaret. That is what the legislation is aimed at, not some dude that wants to play dress up. The leftists are just using it to promote their made up narrative that the right is bigoted. They are chronic liars.
Click to expand...
Nobody employing an ounce of common sense believes that's what's being targeted. It's written that way so people can try to justify their bigoted, unconstitutional stance to their friends
 
#40
#40
I think if you can ban strip shows, you can ban drag shows.

This law is being unnecessarily complicated by the left to make a point. It won't be that complicated to enforce. Drag shows are pretty obvious.
 
#41
#41
utvolpj said:
Nobody employing an ounce of common sense believes that's what's being targeted. It's written that way so people can try to justify their bigoted, unconstitutional stance to their friends
Click to expand...

If it is written to go against the Constitution then the bill would be created by leftists.

The bigoted narrative is more lies crafted by the Democrats desperate to hang on to their LGBQ+ base. Dems are always accusing Republicans of being racist, misogynists, xenophobic, or Nazis to fool their low information voters. It’s a tired, deceitful strategy that they promote with the assistance of the MSM, globalists, Hollywood, and teachers unions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123, OrangeBoro and W.TN.Orange Blood
#42
#42
Don’t worry. You can still wear a dress if that gives you a thrill.
======================================
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 7, Chapter 51, Part 14, relative to adult-oriented performances.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE: SECTION 1. Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 7-51-1401, is amended by adding
the following language as a new subdivision:
"Adult cabaret performance" means a performance in a location other than an
adult cabaret that features topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration; SECTION 2. Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 7-51-1407, is amended by adding
the following language as a new subsection: (c)
(1) It is an offense for a person to engage in an adult cabaret performance:
(A) On public property; or
(B) In a location where the adult cabaret performance could be viewed by a person who is not an adult.
(2) Notwithstanding § 7-51-1406, this subsection (c) expressly:
(A) Preempts an ordinance, regulation, restriction, or license that was lawfully adopted or issued by a political subdivision prior to the effective date of this act that is in conflict with this subsection (c); and
SB0003 000187 -1-
HOUSE BILL 9 By Todd

(B) Prevents or preempts a political subdivision from enacting and enforcing in the future other ordinances, regulations, restrictions, or licenses that are in conflict with this subsection (c).
(3) A first offense for a violation of subdivision (c)(1) is a Class A
misdemeanor, and a second or subsequent such offense is a Class E felony. SECTION 3. This act takes effect July 1, 2023, the public welfare requiring it, and
applies to prohibited conduct occurring on or after that date.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gandalf
#43
#43
It wouldn’t be needed if there weren’t all ages sexualized performances being pushed and adult entertainment migrating into schools.
 
#44
#44
Thunder Good-Oil said:
If it is written to go against the Constitution then the bill would be created by leftists.

The bigoted narrative is more lies crafted by the Democrats desperate to hang on to their LGBQ+ base. Dems are always accusing Republicans of being racist, misogynists, xenophobic, or Nazis to fool their low information voters. It’s a tired, deceitful strategy that they promote with the assistance of the MSM, globalists, Hollywood, and teachers unions.
Click to expand...
That's nonsense. Do you honestly believe anything you typed?
 
#46
#46
 
#47
#47
gcbvol said:
Self-hatred is real. Sometimes that is mixed with envy of those living open lives. But it's mainly about loathing one's self.
Click to expand...

That's true. Being true to ones self in this case would cost him a lot of votes and that's just not something he's willing to do.
 
#48
#48
Thunder Good-Oil said:
1) It is an offense for a person to engage in an adult cabaret performance:
(A) On public property; or
Click to expand...
Once again, that is too broadly written ...

The Tennessee state government is trying to legislate how performers can dress while they are on public property. I don't think that will pass muster with the 1st Amendment. The law violates the performer's right to freedom of expression.
 
#49
#49
BowlBrother85 said:
Once again, that is too broadly written ...

The Tennessee state government is trying to legislate how performers can dress while they are on public property. I don't think that will pass muster with the 1st Amendment. The law violates the performer's right to freedom of expression.
Click to expand...

When you omit the primary definition that is included in the bill then it is broad.

"Adult cabaret performance" means a performance in a location other than an
adult cabaret that features topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration
============================================================================
You can’t perform a sexualized exhibition in front of children and use the 1st Amendment to justify it.

Luckily the Dems haven’t dismantled the Bill of Rights (yet), so that same 1A protects citizens from their actual rights being taken away by the government.
======================================
Before you promote the leftist’s lie, here’s the definition of a key word for you that is part of the legislation:

“having or encouraging an excessive interest in sexual matters.”
======================================
It seems pretty simple. Dress up as a member of the opposite sex in view of minors - not an issue. Drop your pants, bend over and expose yourself to that audience and risk losing your freedom.
 
#50
#50
Thunder Good-Oil said:
When you omit the primary definition that is included in the bill then it is broad.

"Adult cabaret performance" means a performance in a location other than an
adult cabaret that features topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration
============================================================================
You can’t perform a sexualized exhibition in front of children and use the 1st Amendment to justify it.

Luckily the Dems haven’t dismantled the Bill of Rights (yet), so that same 1A protects citizens from their actual rights being taken away by the government.
======================================
Before you promote the leftist’s lie, here’s the definition of a key word for you that is part of the legislation:

“having or encouraging an excessive interest in sexual matters.”
======================================
It seems pretty simple. Dress up as a member of the opposite sex in view of minors - not an issue. Drop your pants, bend over and expose yourself to that audience and risk losing your freedom.
Click to expand...
It's written too broadly ... and will be shot down in court.

... and cabaret does not typically feature nudity. A show of that type which does feature nudity, would be described as "burlesque."

If we are talking about a performance on public property, the onus is on parents/guardians to keep children away from where these shows are taking place. Those performers have as much right to be there as you do. As long as they are fully clothed, it should not matter to the government if they are cross-dressing or not. The government has no business regulating how people dress.
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top