Tennessee's Anti-LGBTQ LT. Governor, Randy McNally, Loves Naked Pics of Gay Man

[BowlBrother85]

You can’t understand that “adult cabaret” and “cabaret” are not the same thing. All you have to do is to click on the link that I gave you for the definition of CABARET.

Your insults are all you’ve got.

Yes, they are.

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

For the 3rd time ... the government can define what it means to be fully clothed (what body parts must be covered), and they can tell you to remain fully clothed in public. They just can't tell you the manner in which you should be full clothed.

Then the government can define what performances are sexualized and are only appropriate for adults and are not to be viewed by children.

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

Yes, they are.

And you called me an idiot.

 

[BowlBrother85]

And you called me an idiot.

Yes, I did.

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

Yes, I did.

I’m sure that you need help seeing the irony.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

It's definitely interesting that the left is so furious that Tennessee, and Florida, want to stop the men playing dress up from being around children. If you notice, none of their arguments are about the men being able to Express themselves, or dress up like they pretend to be, not one single one. It's only when they're restricted from being around children, that's when they start threads and make comments on any social media.

It’s interesting the right is supposedly for less governance and laws.

Also interesting that the right only wants to restrict drag and not other forms of entertainment that are equally sexual but straight in nature.

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

It’s interesting the right is supposedly for less governance and laws.

Also interesting that the right only wants to restrict drag and not other forms of entertainment that are equally sexual but straight in nature.

It’s not only drag. It doesn’t even use the language drag show:

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 7, Chapter 51, Part 14, relative to adult-oriented performances.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE: SECTION 1. Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 7-51-1401, is amended by adding
the following language as a new subdivision:
"Adult cabaret performance" means a performance in a location other than an
adult cabaret that features topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration

 

[ClearwaterVol]

When you omit the primary definition that is included in the bill then it is broad.

"Adult cabaret performance" means a performance in a location other than an
adult cabaret that features topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration
============================================================================
You can’t perform a sexualized exhibition in front of children and use the 1st Amendment to justify it.

Luckily the Dems haven’t dismantled the Bill of Rights (yet), so that same 1A protects citizens from their actual rights being taken away by the government.
======================================
Before you promote the leftist’s lie, here’s the definition of a key word for you that is part of the legislation:

“having or encouraging an excessive interest in sexual matters.”
======================================
It seems pretty simple. Dress up as a member of the opposite sex in view of minors - not an issue. Drop your pants, bend over and expose yourself to that audience and risk losing your freedom.

that law is anything but simple and does not clearly state what puts one in jeopardy of violating it.

 

[BowlBrother85]

It’s interesting the right is supposedly for less governance and laws.

Also interesting that the right only wants to restrict drag and not other forms of entertainment that are equally sexual but straight in nature.

The "we just want to protect children" narrative is subterfuge.

Republicans are legislating against a lifestyle which they find unseemly ... or at least pretend to find unseemly. I think there are several Randy McNally-types in their midst. McNally is not an outlier at all, when it comes to closeted, Republican homosexuals, who target gays and lesbians with regulation. He is ashamed of what he is ... so he compensates for it by attacking gays and lesbians who have the courage to be who they really are in public. It's both jealousy and cowardice.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Look at you all tough, you mighty keyboard warrior . You're triggered because I won't play pretend. A guy pretending to be a woman, and demanding I play make believe with them is absolutely a mental disorder, and they don't need around kids. Debate it, show me the science, or go sit down with your toddler tantrums because I don't play make believe. You gonna fight for people when they start pretending to be a banana? I hope so, or you're a hypocrite, because it's no different than a man pretending to be a woman. It'd be different if you could carry a conversation without acting like a little kid, but you can't stand a different opinion. I think yours is just as stupid as you view mine, but I'm not a spoiled little toddler crying in front of everyone because you don't agree with me. You're bunch can't handle a different opinion, and it's both sad, and hilarious at the meltdown you guys have, instead of being able to debate anything. I'd bet you anything you're the type to hide your face in protests, and hit women and sucker punch what man you'd dare to hit. Pathetic, I've seen children take a different opinion better than a few of you.

You still can't differentiate trans and drag.

You are a mental (and physical) midget. You are not tall enough to engage this rollercoaster.

 

[joevol33]

It’s interesting the right is supposedly for less governance and laws.

Also interesting that the right only wants to restrict drag and not other forms of entertainment that are equally sexual but straight in nature.

At no point have I said I agree with more governance. I said those men dressing as women don't need to be going to schools around kids. Apparently the schools don't have enough sense to understand that. They don't let me visit to share my faith, and if they did, I'd guarantee you, dink, bowlbrother, etc would pitch a fit over it. No reason at all for a man dressed as a woman to go to a school, and read books about that same thing to children. That's my take, I don't care what they do at Walmart, the theater, or any other public place. They can go play dress up all they want in other places, people are mad because this us blocking them from kids. It's kinda like the gay couple wanting the Christian Baker to do their cake, remember that? There's a million places in this country they could've went, but they targeted that bakery. Why? Attention and outrage, and to try and make the government allow them to force their beliefs on someone who didn't agree. Not one of you had a problem then. They didn't go to a bakery run by muslims, hindu, or anyone else, they picked the Christian Baker.

 

[joevol33]

You still can't differentiate trans and drag.

You are a mental (and physical) midget. You are not tall enough to engage this rollercoaster.

I know the difference, I also know that both are not needed around kids. I'll give you credit for sticking with midget on name calling on that response.

 

[ClearwaterVol]

At no point have I said I agree with more governance. I said those men dressing as women don't need to be going to schools around kids. Apparently the schools don't have enough sense to understand that. They don't let me visit to share my faith, and if they did, I'd guarantee you, dink, bowlbrother, etc would pitch a fit over it. No reason at all for a man dressed as a woman to go to a school, and read books about that same thing to children. That's my take, I don't care what they do at Walmart, the theater, or any other public place. They can go play dress up all they want in other places, people are mad because this us blocking them from kids. It's kinda like the gay couple wanting the Christian Baker to do their cake, remember that? There's a million places in this country they could've went, but they targeted that bakery. Why? Attention and outrage, and to try and make the government allow them to force their beliefs on someone who didn't agree. Not one of you had a problem then. They didn't go to a bakery run by muslims, hindu, or anyone else, they picked the Christian Baker.

I don’t view drag shows at schools as appropriate because it really provides nothing of educational value.

As for the bakery, when you open a business you are agreeing to abide by anti discrimination laws. The baker was asked to bake a cake. The only reason he wouldn’t make it was because the customers were gay and it was going to be eaten at their wedding.

That baker is once again in court. Colorado baker loses appeal over transgender birthday cake

 

[joevol33]

I don’t view drag shows at schools as appropriate because it really provides nothing of educational value.

As for the bakery, when you open a business you are agreeing to abide by anti discrimination laws. The baker was asked to bake a cake. The only reason he wouldn’t make it was because the customers were gay and it was going to be eaten at their wedding.

That baker is once again in court. Colorado baker loses appeal over transgender birthday cake

I'll agree you sign up to do business, and they should understand that. That said, I also stand by what I said, they choose this baker on purpose for outrage.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

I know the difference, I also know that both are not needed around kids. I'll give you credit for sticking with midget on name calling on that response.

No, you don't. You've demonstrated it several times by referencing transgenderism in a discussion about drag.

Just admit that you're way out of your element here, and that your world is so very small.

 

[WoodsmanVol]

Fine example of yet another Republiar hypocrite-ing. Not only do a number of them lust for dong, but some are wife beaters too. Even enjoy voyeurism. Familiy values people, encouraging equal rights forking?

- GOP State Legislator Quits After Having Sex With a Man
- Jerry Falwell Jr 'enjoyed watching' his wife have sex, alleged lover says

 

[WoodsmanVol]

f

 

[NashVol11]

I agree with you 100%, but I'll challenge you to show me a thread, or even a post by anyone on the left that had an issue before state government banned it from schools, or near schools.


Edit to say, while i agree that the government shouldn't tell people how they should dress. I'm in agreement about keeping mentally unstable people who play dress up away from children. You can't make fun of people and call them anti science over covid stuff, then argue that a man in a dress is a woman.

The drag issue wasn’t created by “the left” at all, it’s a moral panic thing that is mostly made up based on a couple of tweets. “State government” had zero issue either before that

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[Ttucke11]

Perfectly acceptable for children! And if you disagree you are a homophobe. I think I got this argument down pat.

 

[Weezy]

It's written too broadly ... and will be shot down in court.

... and cabaret does not typically feature nudity. A show of that type which does feature nudity, would be described as "burlesque."

If we are talking about a performance on public property, the onus is on parents/guardians to keep children away from where these shows are taking place. Those performers have as much right to be there as you do. As long as they are fully clothed, it should not matter to the government if they are cross-dressing or not. The government has no business regulating how people dress.

Why does it matter if they are fully clothed then? Why can we declare nudity an issue but not drag?

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Perfectly acceptable for children! And if you disagree you are a homophobe. I think I got this argument down pat.

Literally no one in here is saying they agree with bringing kids to these shows.

We're just saying the government shouldn't make more laws to stymie it.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Why does it matter if they are fully clothed then? Why can we declare nudity an issue but not drag?

Because there are already indecency laws regarding nudity in place. Nudity and drag are two completely different things.

 

[Ttucke11]

Literally no one in here is saying they agree with bringing kids to these shows.

We're just saying the government shouldn't make more laws to stymie it.

I'm just trying to get a rise. I actually agree, more government involvement is never a good solution.

 

[Weezy]

Because there are already indecency laws regarding nudity in place. Nudity and drag are two completely different things.

Drag show clubs and strip clubs are not that far apart. They've always been treated the same, adult nightlife. The law lumps the two together. It's not that complicated to me. Maybe it's not necessary. But I don't see how its a first amendment issue.