AirVol
Let’s go Brandon
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
- Messages
- 23,645
- Likes
- 35,057
The Houston Chronicle this morning: "...state officials will begin busing migrants to Washington D.C. Thursday morning, said Texas Division of Emergency Management Chief Nim Kidd, whose agency is overseeing the operation. Abbot was asked where the apprehended migrants will be dropped off said, 'The first location will be the steps of the United States Capitol.'"
Sometimes I wonder why immigration at the border needs to be a federal issue? Why not let the border states decide how they want to handle it?
And if we're going to do buses, let's just have a non-stop fleet that picks them up from Mexico and delivers them to Canada?
The borders with Mexico are really both national and state boundaries. States should already have the ability to act. In most cases (perhaps all) the border jumpers are passing directly onto state territory. There are some cases where the US holds land adjacent to the border that may be exempt from state jurisdiction.
Do the feds own a few feet of border clearance? As the feds do own so much access over the entire border, the states should build their own wall where Fed ownership ends.
Edit
The Roosevelt Reservation is the 60-foot (18 m)-wide strip of land owned by the United States Federal Government along the United States side of the United States–Mexico Border in three of the four border states.
I see state loopholes for this invasion
Texas has started building their own wall.The borders with Mexico are really both national and state boundaries. States should already have the ability to act. In most cases (perhaps all) the border jumpers are passing directly onto state territory. There are some cases where the US holds land adjacent to the border that may be exempt from state jurisdiction.
Mexico needs a massive hulking wall along its southern border. I’d kick in a few pesos for that.Texas has started building their own wall.
Governor Abbott Announces Border Wall Construction Strategy
Texas Border Wall Construction Status
The actual Libertarian Party platform is for open borders. Which is why I'm often pointing this out in here. You may know that but other people don't. A lot of people like to make the claim they are Libertarian because they don't want to identify as Republican or Democrat. When it comes to actually supporting LP Party candidates in elections they don't do it. Then you have self proclaimed Libertarians supporting vaccine mandates which go entirely against Libertarian principles.Open boarders is a ****ing stupid idea.
To say that libertarians are for it is ****ing stupid.
It’s as stupid as saying libertarians don’t have locks on their doors because they don’t believe on keeping people out of their houses.
Or do only certain boarders matter to libertarians?
I get the deal that hypocrisy is ok as long as it's your side. If they are truly criminals as many here like to say then they should be treated as such right? Or is ignoring the law for political points now ok for both sides?You know the deal. You don't have to play dumb. Tennessee (Bill Lee) should do the same thing when he catches Majorkas sending them to Tennessee.