That's racist!

#79
#79
My turn... I am not Hillary Clinton, and I never claimed to be. Wow. This whole idea of stating things that are painfully obvious to everyone else already is really fun. You're racist.

Well you're the one who said I 'm probably used to having my best efforts fall short. Well non-perfect people have experienced their best efforts fall short multiple times. LOL talk about painfully obvious. Pot.kettle.black.
 
#80
#80
Well you're the one who said I 'm probably used to having my best efforts fall short. Well non-perfect people have experienced their best efforts fall short multiple times. LOL talk about painfully obvious. Pot.kettle.black.

You racists only see color. Why does the kettle have to be black? You should be more colorblind. You're racist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#81
#81
You racists only see color. Why does the kettle have to be black? You should be more colorblind. You're racist.

No one said kettles have to be black. I referenced a kettle as black. That doesn't mean all kettles are black. Those are two different things.
 
#83
#83
You made a negative connotation with black kettles. You're racist.

No I didn't. I made a negative connotation about the pot. And it's not because they are both black. It's because of the pot's action of calling the kettle black. Those are two different things.
 
#84
#84
No I didn't. I made a negative connotation about the pot. And it's not because they are both black. It's because of the pot's action of calling the kettle black. Those are two different things.

You didn't reference the pot calling the kettle anything. You said, "Pot. Kettle. Black." You never referenced an action. You made a negative connotation based solely on the color of the cookware. Cookware should not be judged by the color of its finish, but by the content of its character. You're racist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#86
#86
You didn't reference the pot calling the kettle anything. You said, "Pot. Kettle. Black." You never referenced an action. You made a negative connotation based solely on the color of the cookware. Cookware should not be judged by the color of its finish, but by the content of its character. You're racist.

If you didn't know i was referencing "Pot calling the kettle black" when I wrote "Pot.kettle.black"...well now you know.
 
#90
#90
I didn't find it ambiguous. I read it at face value the first time. You felt the need to clarify. You're racist.

Well I clarified because you didn't seem to recognized that when I wrote "pot.kettle.black", I was referencing "the pot calling the kettle black". So if you didn't know then, now you know.
 
#91
#91
Well I clarified because you didn't seem to recognized that when I wrote "pot.kettle.black", I was referencing "the pot calling the kettle black". So if you didn't know then, now you know.

There is nothing I know based on anything you have attempted to clarify. Anything I know now, I knew without any input from you. You're racist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#92
#92
There is nothing I know based on anything you have attempted to clarify. Anything I know now, I knew without any input from you. You're racist.

So perhaps you still don't know that when I wrote "pot.kettle.black", I was referencing "the pot calling the kettle black". Now that's funny too.
 
#94
#94
You have a very unique sense of humor. That's the funny part. Lol. You're racist.

LOL well you're the one who thinks I support "Robbing spics' because that's how you interpret my user name. With a thought process like that, yes I do feel it necessary to explain to you that "pot.kettle.black" means "the pot calling the kettle black".
 
#95
#95
LOL well you're the one who thinks I support "Robbing spics' because that's how you interpret my user name. With a thought process like that, yes I do feel it necessary to explain to you that "pot.kettle.black" means "the pot calling the kettle black".

You have no idea what I think about what you may or may not support. You have a very unique sense of humor. That's the funny part. Lol. You're racist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#96
#96
You have no idea what I think about what you may or may not support. You have a very unique sense of humor. That's the funny part. Lol. You're racist.

You said my user name is racist. The only way for it to be racist is if you think I support Robbing spics. Because if you don't think my user name indicates I support robbing spics, then it wouldn't be racist.
 
#97
#97
Part of it means business and consumers freely choosing their business affairs. That's what happened here. Some consumers complained about the GAP ad. In response the GAP voluntarily took the ad down. The Gap was free to leave the ad, or take it down. That was there choice.

Ok, but what does that have to do with the LGBT part of your statement?
 
#98
#98
Ok, but what does that have to do with the LGBT part of your statement?

Because I suspect some LGBT haters will ridicule Gap's choice, even though it was a choice borne out of free-market principles....the same free-market that they allegedly support.
 
Is the first lady racist?
Cfhz9AQUMAAFp5P.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people

VN Store



Back
Top