LouderVol
Extra and Terrestrial
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 55,421
- Likes
- 55,547
just curious what has/would removal fix or make better?
Racists are still going to racist, snow flakes are still going to melt. Germany has its stumbling stones, a constant reminder of their dark deeds, yet the jews aren't over there digging them up and being offended over them.
and at least as far a the solider themselves and what they stood for, I thought we were far enough advanced to separate the individual from the subject of the war. Vietnam as a great example. Joe Blow Reb wasn't fighting over slavery. There were less than 400,000 slave owning families out of a population of 8,289,782 (freemen only) in the slave holding states. that's less than 5% of the population as slave owners. http://www.civil-war.net/pages/1860_census.html I am willing to bet pennies vs dollars that that 5% did not make up a sizable percentage of the guys doing the fighting. probably about double the base population.
undoubtedly you have the racists that take pride in a General's statue, but I would say most other people care because of a family tie. They care because their great great whatever served under that guy and he was a famous general. I would say the split is probably similar to slave owners vs not.
so again what are you fixing vs what are you removing?
Racists are still going to racist, snow flakes are still going to melt. Germany has its stumbling stones, a constant reminder of their dark deeds, yet the jews aren't over there digging them up and being offended over them.
and at least as far a the solider themselves and what they stood for, I thought we were far enough advanced to separate the individual from the subject of the war. Vietnam as a great example. Joe Blow Reb wasn't fighting over slavery. There were less than 400,000 slave owning families out of a population of 8,289,782 (freemen only) in the slave holding states. that's less than 5% of the population as slave owners. http://www.civil-war.net/pages/1860_census.html I am willing to bet pennies vs dollars that that 5% did not make up a sizable percentage of the guys doing the fighting. probably about double the base population.
undoubtedly you have the racists that take pride in a General's statue, but I would say most other people care because of a family tie. They care because their great great whatever served under that guy and he was a famous general. I would say the split is probably similar to slave owners vs not.
so again what are you fixing vs what are you removing?