Godfatha
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2006
- Messages
- 11,693
- Likes
- 13,945
Order of teams I want in next round (from most to least)
1. Madrid
2. Apoel
3. Benfica
4. Chelsea
5. Marseille
6. Bayern München
7. AC Milan
Question for anyone who might be in the know...
In CL league games where extra time is involved in the second leg, does the away goals rule still apply once extra time starts? I can't off the top of my head remember a game where it came up, but it was never really clarified during the game yesterday, so I wasn't sure if Chelsea would have been out because of away goals if Napoli had gotten a goal in extra time or if the game would have just gone to penalties if both teams had scored.
Question for anyone who might be in the know...
In CL league games where extra time is involved in the second leg, does the away goals rule still apply once extra time starts? I can't off the top of my head remember a game where it came up, but it was never really clarified during the game yesterday, so I wasn't sure if Chelsea would have been out because of away goals if Napoli had gotten a goal in extra time or if the game would have just gone to penalties if both teams had scored.
Gives that him team 30 extra minutes to use their home field advantage to get an extra goal.
Why should they get rid of extra time? If anything they should get rid of penalties. It's exciting for the fans but a bad way of deciding important games.
They should get rid of it because it's not fair. The away goals tiebreaker itself is stupid. Not allowing it to be applied evenly is worse.Extra time actually helps the away team more. If teams are tied 2-2 with each game finishing 1-1 in regulation and then each team scores a goal in extra time, then the away team would win because they now have one more away goal.
They should get rid of it because it's not fair. The away goals tiebreaker itself is stupid. Not allowing it to be applied evenly is worse.
Eh could be a worse draw. The Barcelona - AC Milan game should be fun.
You got a better idea? I'm sure FIFA have NEVER had any other ideas. It's better than just settling it with PK's and it keeps the visiting team from just sitting back and playing defense the whole match.
I look at it like this, is it doesn't bother the players, it doesn't bother me.
There are obvious issues with penalties, but at least the winner of a shootout is winning something. Not much is more idiotic than watching a team tie 0-0 and then 1-1 and have one be declared the 'winner.'You got a better idea? I'm sure FIFA have NEVER had any other ideas. It's better than just settling it with PK's and it keeps the visiting team from just sitting back and playing defense the whole match.
I look at it like this, is it doesn't bother the players, it doesn't bother me.
You think it's bad?
Real Madrid v Apeol
Bayern vs Marseille
Barcelona v AC Milan
Chelsea v Benfica
That sets up two amazing semifinal games. I'm just glad we didn't get some combination of Apeol, Marseille and Benfica playing each other and guaranteeing one of those three will make the next round. If I'm being picky, I would like to swap Milan and Chelsea, just so I can see Chelsea lose as soon as possible, but I'll take a (likely) semi round of RM vs. Bayern and Barca vs. Chelsea any year.