The Bama INT returned for a "TD" against SC....

#1

UT's#1Fan

Senior Executive Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2008
Messages
4,840
Likes
1,006
#1
...was not a touchdown. The defender dropped the ball just before he got into the end zone and it was kicked out of the end zone by a bammer.

I can't imagine how on earth that play wasn’t reviewed. But then I remembered, it happened at BDS...

What does this have to do with UT? It's going to be hard enough beating the bammers in crimson, let alone the guys in black and white stripes this Saturday.

Does anyone else remember that play?

EDIT: Added photo's for clarification.
 

Attachments

  • ScreenHunter_02 Oct. 19 09.45.gif
    ScreenHunter_02 Oct. 19 09.45.gif
    50.6 KB · Views: 43
  • ScreenHunter_01 Oct. 19 09.45.gif
    ScreenHunter_01 Oct. 19 09.45.gif
    41.1 KB · Views: 191
Last edited:
#2
#2
Yeah.. It was reviewed and the refs said the ball crossed the line before it was knocked out.. I agreed with them but I defintely agree they will get the favorable calls this weekend.. .
 
#3
#3
...was not a touchdown. The defender dropped the ball just before he got into the end zone and it was kicked out of the end zone by a bammer.

I can't imagine how on earth that play wasn’t reviewed. But then I remembered, it happened at BDS...

What does this have to do with UT? It's going to be hard enough beating the bammers in crimson, let alone the guys in black and white stripes this Saturday.

Does anyone else remember that play?

Were you watching the game?

During that play he did lose the ball, but he recovered it himself in the end zone by laying on it. It never went out of bounds. Whether or not he fumbled it before or after the goal line, I could not tell.
 
#4
#4
We all have fears of being home-cooked by the refs in the opponent's arena. We share those fears when we play in Knoxville. Such fears are irrational and paranoid.

Or so I would have said prior to the Ark-Fla game. After that game, as well as UGA-LSU, my hope now is the refs don't make any phantom calls or no-calls either way that influence the outcome.

Sad that recent performance by SEC officials has placed them in the position of being considered a possible 12th man for one team or the other. :cray:

P.S. UT#1Fan, were you watching the game? The play you said wasn't reviewed was in fact reviewed. Ruled a TD. And even if ruled a fumble prior to TD, it was clearly recovered in bounds in the endzone by the guy who fumbled.
 
#5
#5
We all have fears of being home-cooked by the refs in the opponent's arena. We share those fears when we play in Knoxville. Such fears are irrational and paranoid.

Or so I would have said prior to the Ark-Fla game. After that game, as well as UGA-LSU, my hope now is the refs don't make any phantom calls or no-calls either way that influence the outcome.

Sad that recent performance by SEC officials has placed them in the position of being considered a possible 12th man for one team or the other. :cray:

P.S. UT#1Fan, were you watching the game? The play you said wasn't reviewed was in fact reviewed. Ruled a TD. And even if ruled a fumble prior to TD, it was clearly recovered in bounds in the endzone by the guy who fumbled.

The call on the field was ruled a TD. The video evidence was not sufficient enough to over rule the call. It was very close either way, but you're right, it wouldn't have mattered because he recovered the fumble in the end zone anyway.......results, TD either way you look at it.
 
#6
#6
Hopefully, we'll get better officiating playing against Bama then Arky got against UF.
 
#7
#7
If you're referring to the Mark Barron INT returned for a TD at the beginning of the game he was 3 steps deep into the endzone before flipping the ball behind his back. Touchdown. Not even close. You can watch it here secdigitalnetwork.com If you have a better angle I'm up for seeing it. It's not even all that close.
 
#9
#9
If you're referring to the Mark Barron INT returned for a TD at the beginning of the game he was 3 steps deep into the endzone before flipping the ball behind his back. Touchdown. Not even close. You can watch it here secdigitalnetwork.com If you have a better angle I'm up for seeing it. It's not even all that close.

I would like to see the angle you saw, because he was right at the line before the ball was knocked loose. He didn't flip it I promise you that.
 
#10
#10
P.S. UT#1Fan, were you watching the game? The play you said wasn't reviewed was in fact reviewed. Ruled a TD. And even if ruled a fumble prior to TD, it was clearly recovered in bounds in the endzone by the guy who fumbled.

I'm guessing he saw the highlights and made his call
 
#11
#11
...was not a touchdown. The defender dropped the ball just before he got into the end zone and it was kicked out of the end zone by a bammer.

I can't imagine how on earth that play wasn’t reviewed. But then I remembered, it happened at BDS...

What does this have to do with UT? It's going to be hard enough beating the bammers in crimson, let alone the guys in black and white stripes this Saturday.

Does anyone else remember that play?

Grab a clue.
 
#12
#12
I will tell you what pisses me off. AJ Green foR Georgia was flagged for celebration after catching a touchdown pass against LSU, I still don't see what he did wrong. But Tebow can run for a first down and he can jump up and gator chomp, dance around, and fist pump for thirty minutes and he draws no flag. The rule stats you can not bring attention to yourself. Can someone explain to me how Tebow isn't bringing attention to himself? Just another example of how Florida and Alabama will get all the close calls. We might as well face it the SEC wants a team in the National Championship game and Florida and Alabama gives them the best shot. I am going to say it though THE LANE TRAIN is going to derail Alabama's path to the National Championship game on Sat. October 24 3:30 eastern standard time. GO VOLS
 
#13
#13
Were you watching the game?

During that play he did lose the ball, but he recovered it himself in the end zone by laying on it. It never went out of bounds. Whether or not he fumbled it before or after the goal line, I could not tell.

Did you read the title of this thread?
 
#14
#14
P.S. UT#1Fan, were you watching the game? The play you said wasn't reviewed was in fact reviewed. Ruled a TD. And even if ruled a fumble prior to TD, it was clearly recovered in bounds in the endzone by the guy who fumbled.

Did you read the title of this thread?
 
#15
#15
P.S. UT#1Fan, were you watching the game? The play you said wasn't reviewed was in fact reviewed. Ruled a TD. And even if ruled a fumble prior to TD, it was clearly recovered in bounds in the endzone by the guy who fumbled.

This is what I saw. It was a TD. Six one way or half a dozen the other. It's all the same.
 
#16
#16
If you're referring to the Mark Barron INT returned for a TD at the beginning of the game he was 3 steps deep into the endzone before flipping the ball behind his back. Touchdown. Not even close. You can watch it here secdigitalnetwork.com If you have a better angle I'm up for seeing it. It's not even all that close.

Yes it was close. There's no way he was 3 steps in. IMO, he's not in the end zone yet when he decides to drop the ball....

My point is.... it wasn't even reviewed or mentioned, it was home cookin for sure.
 
#17
#17
Yes it was close. There's no way he was 3 steps in. IMO, he's not in the end zone yet when he decides to drop the ball....

My point is.... it wasn't even reviewed or mentioned, it was home cookin for sure.

he still clearly recovered it in the endzone. Do you want it ruled a fumble for a TD? Great, it was a fumble recovered for a TD instead of an int returned for a TD. Really glad you cleared that up for everyone
 
#19
#19
I would like to see the angle you saw, because he was right at the line before the ball was knocked loose. He didn't flip it I promise you that.

Rev, dude. Are you sure you're referring to the Bama game? The thread is about Barron's INT return for a touchdown. A play where no ball was knocked out of anyone's hand. I think you're referring to another game since the only TD's in the Bama game was this one and the Ingram TD at the end of the game.

I believe you're referring to the Arkansas long bomb play that was knocked out of his hands and then recovered in the endzone.
 
#20
#20
I'm guessing he saw the highlights and made his call

Are you serious, I expect a bammer coming in this thread and not understanding what is being spoken about even though it is blatantly spelled out in the title, but you're letting you distaste for me cloud your judgment. I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT THE FLA/ARK GAME.

And if you had known that, your post should have read something like this......

"He's talking about the Barron INT returned for a TD against South Carolina...."
 
#21
#21
Another Epic Fail thread for this OP.

Either way it was a TD...
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#23
#23
Are you serious, I expect a bammer coming in this thread and not understanding what is being spoken about even though it is blatantly spelled out in the title, but you're letting you distaste for me cloud your judgment. I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT THE FLA/ARK GAME.

And if you had known that, your post should have read something like this......

"He's talking about the Barron INT returned for a TD against South Carolina...."

Have you read your title? You keep referring to it like it is a Rosetta stone to your argument, but...
 
#24
#24
I'm just embarrassed that a Bama fan asked a vol fan if he even watched the game and then continues to recount something that happened in the Arky game as if it happened in the Bama game.
 
#25
#25
I'm just embarrassed that a Bama fan asked a vol fan if he even watched the game and then continues to recount something that happened in the Arky game as if it happened in the Bama game.

After reading multiple posts from both... I would feel safe in asking you if you would like to trade.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 

VN Store



Back
Top