The Biden/Harris Administration Accomplishments Thread

[luthervol]

Which gets us the most bang for the buck?

That's a tuff one. Short term, race. Long term, socio-economic. We first need to separate the two so they're less synonymous..

 

[0nelilreb]

Goebbels would be proud of your often told lie.

Trying to argue with luther is fun but , arguing why he , as a hybrid Marxist/ socialist / capitalist would believe social equality trumps all things is pointless really and just leaves you feeling dirty and needing a shower .

 

[NorthDallas40]

I want to post a response to this but I'll likely get banned.

You and I have been going at it pretty hard. But there is no way in hell I’d let that blatant racism go unanswered if I were you Ras.

 

[McDad]

Trying to argue with luther is fun but , arguing why he , as a hybrid Marxist/ socialist / capitalist would believe social equality trumps all things is pointless really and just leaves you feeling dirty and needing a shower .

Imo, luther just illuminated the idiocy of those worried about social media misinformation.
In about 5 minutes, I was able to provide the real truth to his shared, partisan lies. Didn't even need a fact checker to get involved.

 

[luthervol]

Twitter would ban you. There were only a few times when D presidents were coupled with R controlled Senates. The nominations and appointments are listed. Check your "source" next time.

R Controlled Senate. Presidential Party Affiliation
1895 -1913 R, R, R.
1919 - 1933 D, R, R, R
1947 - 1949 D
1953 - 1955 R
1981 - 1987 R, R
1995 - 2001 D, D
2003 - 2007 R
2015 - 2021 R
Woodrow Wilson nominated 3 associate justices.
All confirmed. 14, 14, 16
Truman nominated 4. All confirmed 45, 46, 49, 49
Clinton nominated 2. Both confirmed 93 and 94

Clinton's were confirmed prior to republican control in '94.
Dems controlled the senate in all but 2 years of the Truman admin. The confirmations were when dems controlled.
Dems controlled the senate in all but 2 years of the Wilson admin. The confirmations all took place when dems controlled.

You may want to check your sources before calling someone out on theirs.

 

[luthervol]

Goebbels would be proud of your often told lie.

lol.....Recheck your sources. Then hang your head in shame.

Even though an apology is in order, I don't expect one.

 

[luthervol]

Imo, luther just illuminated the idiocy of those worried about social media misinformation.
In about 5 minutes, I was able to provide the real truth to his shared, partisan lies. Didn't even need a fact checker to get involved.

This just keeps getting funnier.
Maybe you should have spent 10 minutes.

 

[NorthDallas40]

lol.....Recheck your sources. Then hang your head in shame.

Even though an apology is in order, I don't expect one.

You’re right one is in order. You owe Ras, Breathe, and quite a few others an apology you racist hack.

 

[luthervol]

For McDad
U.S. Senate: Supreme Court Nominations (1789-Present)
Party divisions of United States Congresses - Wikipedia

 

[McDad]

Clinton's were confirmed prior to republican control in '94.
Dems controlled the senate in all but 2 years of the Truman admin. The confirmations were when dems controlled.
Dems controlled the senate in all but 2 years of the Wilson admin. The confirmations all took place when dems controlled.

You may want to check your sources before calling someone out on theirs.

It's all here, liar.
List of presidents of the United States - Wikipedia


Woodrow Wilson Supreme Court candidates - Wikipedia.
Harry S. Truman Supreme Court candidates - Wikipedia
Bill Clinton Supreme Court candidates - Wikipedia

 

[McDad]

For McDad
U.S. Senate: Supreme Court Nominations (1789-Present)
Party divisions of United States Congresses - Wikipedia

D president w/ R Senate is a narrow criteria.

Look into it.

 

[GroverCleveland]

Clinton's were confirmed prior to republican control in '94.
Dems controlled the senate in all but 2 years of the Truman admin. The confirmations were when dems controlled.
Dems controlled the senate in all but 2 years of the Wilson admin. The confirmations all took place when dems controlled.

You may want to check your sources before calling someone out on theirs.

This is the usual dishonesty.

Clinton had no nominees when the Rs controlled the Senate.
Same for Truman.
Same for Wilson.

 

[McDad]

Clinton's were confirmed prior to republican control in '94.
Dems controlled the senate in all but 2 years of the Truman admin. The confirmations were when dems controlled.
Dems controlled the senate in all but 2 years of the Wilson admin. The confirmations all took place when dems controlled.

You may want to check your sources before calling someone out on theirs.

You myopic misfit. Your criteria of D president with R controlled Senate is what I searched and provided data for. I listed all pertinent info. It makes your posted source ridiculously clickbaitey.

Now you want to argue stuff I havent claimed.

 

[McDad]

This is the usual dishonesty.

Clinton had no nominees when the Rs controlled the Senate.
Same for Truman.
Same for Wilson.

Precisely. Anyone reading after his "moral high ground " post can correlate the data I presented.

 

[volfanhill]

Collapsing trucker demand could foreshadow looming recession

 

[luthervol]

D president w/ R Senate is a narrow criteria.

Look into it.

lol....
Wilson - all 3 confirmed prior to 1917 - repubs didn't take control until 1919 (you lose)
Truman - None confirmed during the 2 years repubs had control of the senate (you lose)
Clinton - both confirmed prior to repub control (you lose yet again)

I don't know if this is more hysterical or sad.

 

[GroverCleveland]

Precisely. Anyone reading after his "moral high ground " post can correlate the data I presented.

May be the most dishonest poster on the site.

 

[McDad]

lol....
Wilson - all 3 confirmed prior to 1917 - repubs didn't take control until 1919 (you lose)
Truman - None confirmed during the 2 years repubs had control of the senate (you lose)
Clinton - both confirmed prior to repub control (you lose yet again)

I don't know if this is more hysterical or sad.

That's what the data says.
That's why I listed it all.
Your post didnt say D president and D senate.

You're are the absolute worst poster here. You remind how glad I am I've drastically reduced my interaction with you.

 

[luthervol]

Twitter would ban you. There were only a few times when D presidents were coupled with R controlled Senates. The nominations and appointments are listed. Check your "source" next time.

R Controlled Senate. Presidential Party Affiliation
1895 -1913 R, R, R.
1919 - 1933 D, R, R, R
1947 - 1949 D
1953 - 1955 R
1981 - 1987 R, R
1995 - 2001 D, D
2003 - 2007 R
2015 - 2021 R
Woodrow Wilson nominated 3 associate justices.
All confirmed. 14, 14, 16
Truman nominated 4. All confirmed 45, 46, 49, 49
Clinton nominated 2. Both confirmed 93 and 94

You myopic misfit. Your criteria of D president with R controlled Senate is what I searched and provided data for. I listed all pertinent info. It makes your posted source ridiculously clickbaitey.

Now you want to argue stuff I havent claimed.

I thought more highly of you.
Check my source? Seriously? Is that not implying that my source is wrong.
Again, hang your head in shame and do better next time.

 

[McDad]

May be the most dishonest poster on the site.

And he wants to clap back at me pissing about something I never said. Dude belongs on a farm with as many strawmen he builds.

 

[luthervol]

That's what the data says.
That's why I listed it all.
Your post didnt say D president and D senate.

You're are the absolute worst poster here. You remind how glad I am I've drastically reduced my interaction with you.

Please keep that up and try to do better.

 

[McDad]

I thought more highly of you.
Check my source? Seriously? Is that not implying that my source is wrong.
Again, hang your head in shame and do better next time.

I dont think of you at all.

 

[luthervol]

And he wants to clap back at me pissing about something I never said. Dude belongs on a farm with as many strawmen he builds.

What was implied by your "check your source" comment?

 

[McDad]

I thought more highly of you.
Check my source? Seriously? Is that not implying that my source is wrong.
Again, hang your head in shame and do better next time.

Did your source toss out D president R Senate since 1895?

 

[McDad]

What was implied by your "check your source" comment?

Stop typing and read.