The disney insanity continues

@OrangeTsar you spent all that time looking for other examples of government attacking CFA, and all you came up with are 1 attempt by a single crusader that was unsuccessful, 2 recent attempts to block CFA that probably will be unsuccessful, and then to boot you included a denouncement...LOL. All on the very local scale, BTW. You got nothing. Nothing on the scale of a presidential hopeful and governor of one of the largest states in the union targeting and successfully punishing a company for their speech.
Wait…:bring back those goalposts!
You didn’t ask for “successful” attempts to block CFA now did you?
Clever attempt at slight of hand dude. But you are NOW asking for successful attempts by governments to do something blatantly unconstitutional. Nice try. Why not ask for examples of “successful legal bank robberies “?
Face it, you just spouted off your mouth about a subject about which you had zero knowledge. Whereas many of us have watched in disgust for years while virtue signaling Libs attempted to prove their woke credentials by bullying CFA. Pick your fights more carefully in the future if you wish to avoid burn marks
 
Wait…:bring back those goalposts!
You didn’t ask for “successful” attempts to block CFA now did you?
Clever attempt at slight of hand dude. But you are NOW asking for successful attempts by governments to do something blatantly unconstitutional. Nice try. Why not ask for examples of “successful legal bank robberies “?
Face it, you just spouted off your mouth about a subject about which you had zero knowledge. Whereas many of us have watched in disgust for years while virtue signaling Libs attempted to prove their woke credentials by bullying CFA. Pick your fights more carefully in the future if you wish to avoid burn marks

The context is "what actions did the government take against CFA." I didn't move the goal posts, LOL. One crusader unsuccessfully blocking CFA is not a "government action against CFA"

What actions did the government take against CFA?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
The context is "what actions did the government take against CFA." I didn't move the goal posts, LOL. One crusader unsuccessfully blocking CFA is not a "government action against CFA"
One? Arithmetic not your strong suit is it? Psaki’s job about to come open. You should apply you are just what they are looking for.
 
I gave you some credit.

Now can you answer CW's question?
If you can’t understand the difference between trying to prevent a business from even existing vs a legitimate decision to withdraw extra benefits granted a half a century ago with no promise of perpetuity, you are clearly missing the point. No one is trying to close Disney.
 
If you can’t understand the difference between trying to prevent a business from even existing vs a legitimate decision to withdraw extra benefits granted a half a century ago with no promise of perpetuity, you are clearly missing the point. No one is trying to close Disney.

The point is simple. Is the punishing of a company by the government because the company spoke out against the government wrong?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
If you can’t understand the difference between trying to prevent a business from even existing vs a legitimate decision to withdraw extra benefits granted a half a century ago with no promise of perpetuity, you are clearly missing the point. No one is trying to close Disney.
Translation “it’s ok when we do it because our opponents are truly evil”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
If you can’t understand the difference between trying to prevent a business from even existing vs a legitimate decision to withdraw extra benefits granted a half a century ago with no promise of perpetuity, you are clearly missing the point. No one is trying to close Disney.

What have I said that makes you think this is part of the conversation? Nobody (yourself included) has said there is or isn't a difference. JFC, dude, you are such a waste of time.

You won't answer the question.
 
Lol. Please, proceed.
Chick-fil-A president Dan Cathy admitted he was "guilty as charged" in having an anti-homosexual stance.

My question was "does Chick-fil-A openly and knowingly hire gay employees?"

The answer seemed to be yes.
So if they are hired, the next question becomes "do they have an equal chance at promotion?"
If your answer is yes, then the next question becomes "does that remain equally true to the highest levels of the organization?"
If you answer yes to that question - you're a moron.
 
Chick-fil-A president Dan Cathy admitted he was "guilty as charged" in having an anti-homosexual stance.

My question was "does Chick-fil-A openly and knowingly hire gay employees?"

The answer seemed to be yes.
So if they are hired, the next question becomes "do they have an equal chance at promotion?"
If your answer is yes, then the next question becomes "does that remain equally true to the highest levels of the organization?"
If you answer yes to that question - you're a moron.

Nonsense. I do not approve of homosexuality. My personal view does not affect my hiring or promotions, at all. I like seeing my business run as best as it possibly can.

Keep being a cog in your public school, moron.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
Nonsense. I do not approve of homosexuality. My personal view does not affect my hiring or promotions, at all. I like seeing my business run as best as it possibly can.

Keep being a cog in your public school, moron.
lol.............Your personal views 100% affect your hiring and promotions, you are just to blind and unaware to realize it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dergibvol
It just seems like yesterday when the alphabet people were only saying we shouldn’t care what 2 consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedroom. Now they’ve progressed into our children’s bedrooms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ttucke11

VN Store



Back
Top