There is no lesson to be learned in the first round of the AA's if you get your ass handed to you. More games is more games and winning games is better for a young team than losing.your not being realistic though, thats my point. you ask any coach in america which they'd prefer a 1st round ncaa loss, or a nit championship and they'll take the ncaa everytime.
you keep going on about getting the young team experience, that is what the off-season is for. PLUS, we will have about 3 weeks i believe it is in the summer in which our whole team and staff will go to europe and play against opposing european teams. this is a great learning experience, and you get tons of practicing and chemistry situations to build off when you get back.
heres the other experience factor you are missing. have you ever been to a nit game? they are usually pretty empty and just not very hyped or much of a draw. so if next year your goal is the ncaa tournament, wouldnt experience IN THE NCAA tournament and seeing all the medai and hype be more valuable? its not even a question. the experience young players get from 1 game in the ncaa tournament rivals that of the experience they get from the nit. the nit is like playing in a hs gym with a few hundred fans watching, playing in the ncaa is completely different. so if your goal is to be in the ncaa tourney next year, you would definitely want your players gaining the experience of atleast going there this year, over going to the hs gyms for nit games.
one other key aspect here is recruiting. the name NCAA TOURNAMENT speaks for itself and i can promise you is brought up on the recruiting trail. the NIT is just made fun of by anyone, and everyone in college basketball, its called the losers bracket for a reason. some coaches even decline invitations to the NIT, because they dont want their program being associated with the NIT, and recruits seeing that exposure. seeing tennessee on those march madness brackets, and all over espn when analysts are breaking down matchups is what you call exposure. the nationally televised games of the ncaa tournament are what you also call exposure. exposure goes a long ways as far as recruiting goes.
im not trying to call you dumb or stupid or a bad fan. im simply informing you that, our coach, and every coach in the nation would choose to go to the ncaa tournament and lose in the 1st round over going to the NIT and winning the championships. the exposure, experience and education you gain from the ncaa tournament is far and above better than that you'll receive in the nit.
Yes any coach is supposed to rather be in the dance than the NIT. I am not a coach. My job is not on the line so I can look at the whole thing a tad more clearly because of that. If we go to NIT (whih is the most likely outcome anyway) we get more experience even if we go to europe.. see it comes down to math my friend. 4 is more than 3 every day of the week. The more experience we get the better it is for us next year. I am and always will be a big picture type of guy.
This team is at least 2-3 years away from being any sort of threat in the dance I personally prefer the outcome that makes it 2 and not 3. Playing in the NIT winning it would show these kids those guys are not in their class and prepare them to beat the teams they are supposed to beat (which has always been the biggest problem with UT BB). A first round blowout only shows them they don't belong there.