The Foreign Trade Thread

#1,027
#1,027
n_huffhines said:
It's good for businesses that have imported input costs, which is basically all businesses. Only one percent of American businesses export. 1%. Again, for the people in the back. 1%.
Click to expand...

But even if you don't export, cheaper imported goods can undercut your business.

Like everything, there are positives and negatives to a policy.

You got to try to find where there's maximum positives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and Burger
#1,028
#1,028
n_huffhines said:
Link?

If trade were that simple, Trump would understand it.
Click to expand...

Is modern monetary theory nutty or essential? . I am wrong about Krugman on MMT.

Trade is not really as complicated as people make it out to be. What makes it complicated is the fact that it dives into politics and trade is used as a bargaining chip.

You guys are absolutely correct on the short term positives in terms of cheaper goods. I would be a complete idiot to deny that. The problem is we do not have free trade at all. We have a trade policy with China where we pay to deal with them. This turns into other threats when they start stealing technology. China has completely outsmarted the US Government, and the US worker is paying for it.
We have to make at least an effort to keep the US worker working through deregulation, lower taxes, and free + fair trade policies.

Nobody is completely against free trade, but we cannot make ourselves uncompetitive in the long term if we keep getting manipulated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#1,029
#1,029
Velo Vol said:
But even if you don't export, cheaper imported goods can undercut your business.

Like everything, there are positives and negatives to a policy.

You got to try to find where there's maximum positives.
Click to expand...

The number of businesses that gain from free trade greatly outnumber the businesses that are hurt by it.
 
#1,030
#1,030
Burger said:
Is modern monetary theory nutty or essential? . I am wrong about Krugman on MMT.

Trade is not really as complicated as people make it out to be. What makes it complicated is the fact that it dives into politics and trade is used as a bargaining chip.

You guys are absolutely correct on the short term positives in terms of cheaper goods. I would be a complete idiot to deny that. The problem is we do not have free trade at all. We have a trade policy with China where we pay to deal with them. This turns into other threats when they start stealing technology. China has completely outsmarted the US Government, and the US worker is paying for it.
We have to make at least an effort to keep the US worker working through deregulation, lower taxes, and free + fair trade policies.

Nobody is completely against free trade, but we cannot make ourselves uncompetitive in the long term if we keep getting manipulated.
Click to expand...

That's one guy. You said "these are the same people". Just because one guy believes something stupid doesn't discredit all of them. The point of the cartoon is that all different kinds of economists agree on this. There was a recent poll done with like 115 trade economists and something like 90% said it's the best policy and 10% said not sure. People can discredit the field for it's poor forecasting and inability to come to an agreement on a lot of things, but you cannot lump in consensus economic wisdom with the areas that are murky. There is consensus for good reason.
 
#1,031
#1,031
n_huffhines said:
That's one guy. You said "these are the same people". Just because one guy believes something stupid doesn't discredit all of them. The point of the cartoon is that all different kinds of economists agree on this. There was a recent poll done with like 115 trade economists and something like 90% said it's the best policy and 10% said not sure. People can discredit the field for it's poor forecasting and inability to come to an agreement on a lot of things, but you cannot lump in consensus economic wisdom with the areas that are murky. There is consensus for good reason.
Click to expand...

I will admit being wrong on the bold. I am in the club of the war can't go on for too long ,or we start hurting ourselves. We could do the smart thing and put the Tariff money into infrastructure, but our government is too stupid.

My wonder is if we can stay focused long enough with it to win a war of attrition. China is a nation of long term planning.
 
#1,035
#1,035
Velo Vol said:
And the employees?
Click to expand...

They stay employed and enjoy cheaper goods with their wages.

Also, the employees that want to strike out on their own and start new businesses....free trade makes that easier, and then they will benefit, as well as their future employees.

And so on.
 
#1,036
#1,036
n_huffhines said:
They stay employed and enjoy cheaper goods with their wages.

Also, the employees that want to strike out on their own and start new businesses....free trade makes that easier, and then they will benefit, as well as their future employees.

And so on.
Click to expand...

If only there was such a thing as free trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#1,037
#1,037
hog88 said:
If only there was such a thing as free trade.
Click to expand...

There you go, siding with the protectionists again. What a surprise.

The problem with this deflection you and other protectionists keep regurgitating is that there doesn't need to be perfectly free trade in order for less protectionism to create net benefit. It's a spectrum, and the freer the trade, the better, regardless of reciprocation.
 
#1,038
#1,038
n_huffhines said:
There you go, siding with the protectionists again. What a surprise.

The problem with this deflection you and other protectionists keep regurgitating is that there doesn't need to be perfectly free trade in order for less protectionism to create net benefit. It's a spectrum, and the freer the trade, the better, regardless of reciprocation.
Click to expand...

I’m not siding with protectionist, I’m just pointing out the fallacy of your argument. Unless the standards are the same there is no free trade, someone is at a disadvantage. I’m for reducing regulations to equal the playing field.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and Obsessed
#1,039
#1,039
hog88 said:
I’m not siding with protectionist, I’m just pointing out the fallacy of your argument. Unless the standards are the same there is no free trade, someone is at a disadvantage. I’m for reducing regulations to equal the playing field.
Click to expand...

You're not making an argument about the logic of my position, you're making a semantic argument. These other regulations you and I oppose are a completely different conversation that have no bearing on whether or not we should reduce our protectionism.
 
#1,040
#1,040
n_huffhines said:
You're not making an argument about the logic of my position, you're making a semantic argument. These other regulations you and I oppose are a completely different conversation that have no bearing on whether or not we should reduce our protectionism.
Click to expand...

That would be like cutting off your nose just to spite your face without reducing regulations.
 
#1,041
#1,041
hog88 said:
That would be like cutting off your nose just to spite your face without reducing regulations.
Click to expand...

Your ass is on backwards, bro.

Reducing barriers to trade is good for our economy.

Reducing regulations is good for our economy.

Either one without the other is good for our economy.

Exacting tariff taxes on Americans in a misguided effort to level a playing field that other internal policies made uneven is cutting off your nose to spite your face. Two wrongs don't make a right.
 
#1,042
#1,042
n_huffhines said:
Your ass is on backwards, bro.

Reducing barriers to trade is good for our economy.

Reducing regulations is good for our economy.

Either one without the other is good for our economy.

Exacting tariff taxes on Americans in a misguided effort to level a playing field that other internal policies made uneven is cutting off your nose to spite your face. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Click to expand...

I look at like a prison bitch, they bend over and take it because they might get an extra pudding, don’t get beat up and all they have to do is bend over. Then one day the ****ers decide they don’t have to give you an extra pudding and start slapping you around because you’re to weak to stop being bent over.

You have to fight back and let them know you’re not getting screwed anymore even if you get hurt a little doing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and Obsessed
#1,043
#1,043
hog88 said:
I look at like a prison bitch, they bend over and take it because they might get an extra pudding, don’t get beat up and all they have to do is bend over. Then one day the ****ers decide they don’t have to give you an extra pudding and start slapping you around because you’re to weak to stop being bent over.

You have to fight back and let them know you’re not getting screwed anymore even if you get hurt a little doing it.
Click to expand...

What in the hell does this ^ have to do with our regulations creating an unlevel playing field? You completely shifted gears and now you're saying it's because of what our trading partners are doing to us, not what we're doing to ourselves.

You're all over the place and grasping at straws, but at least you're no longer pretending that you don't support protectionism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Gucci Sosa
#1,044
#1,044
n_huffhines said:
Your ass is on backwards, bro.

Reducing barriers to trade is good for our economy.

Reducing regulations is good for our economy.

Either one without the other is good for our economy.

Exacting tariff taxes on Americans in a misguided effort to level a playing field that other internal policies made uneven is cutting off your nose to spite your face. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Click to expand...

None of those things were Done. We do not have Free Trade with China, and we want Free Trade. I am more concerned with the IP Theft and the currency manipulation than Tariffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#1,045
#1,045
Burger said:
None of those things were Done. We do not have Free Trade with China, and we want Free Trade. I am more concerned with the IP Theft and the currency manipulation than Tariffs.
Click to expand...

For the last time, we will never have perfectly free trade with anyone, so holding any relationship to that impossible standard will always prevent us from reducing protectionism and doing the right thing for America.

It's fine if you want to make it about IP theft, but we're never going to get anywhere with that. The fact of the matter is Trump and his fanboys make blanket endorsements of protectionism, regardless of the question of IP theft. It's not just about China. We've been ****ing ourselves over with various relationships.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top