Proud Army Wife
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2018
- Messages
- 10,561
- Likes
- 30,719
By that logic, how did we blow out Kentucky and then beat them again in the tournament. You're coming in strong with moronic logic.
I don't think anyone has questioned Villanova deserving a 2 seed. Presumably, had the seeding followed the NET rankings, we'd have been paired against a 3 seed with a weaker resume than Villanova has.
So it's moronic to be dissatisfied with a potential matchup with a team that made us look foolish in our only matchup this year? A team that has arguably the best coach, who seems to get even more out of his team in March, in the country?
Would you be upset if we were seeded 3 in Kentucky's region and our only sample size was our first matchup?
It's not a question of can this team beat anyone, the tournament is a gauntlet and a path not featuring a Nova matchup would be a path of less resistance.
The committee didn’t even list us as the top 3 seed.2 things are clear— (1) while KY may deserve a 2 seed, they don’t deserve the top 2 seed. That puts them in the bracket with the weakest 1 seed. Their record goes to justify such an easy bracket. (2) Duke gets the 2 seed which puts them in Greenville. They don’t deserve a 2 and don’t deserve to play in their home territory.
With the seeding issue in mind, which 2 OR 3 seeds would you prefer to meet instead of Nova? I know we are better off with experience for all our freshmen, don't know which way they have trended.
Did you watch our last game against NOVA?